• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑气候变化缓解行为并探索公共卫生共同效益:德尔菲研究。

Prioritising Climate Change Mitigation Behaviours and Exploring Public Health Co-Benefits: A Delphi Study.

机构信息

Behavioural Science and Insights Unit (BSIU), UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Porton Down, Wiltshire, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK.

Climate Change and Health Unit, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Chilton, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065094.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20065094
PMID:36982003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10049208/
Abstract

Climate change requires urgent action; however, it can be challenging to identify individual-level behaviours that should be prioritised for maximum impact. The study aimed to prioritise climate change mitigation behaviours according to their impacts on climate change and public health, and to identify associated barriers and facilitators-exploring the impact of observed behaviour shifts associated with COVID-19 in the UK. A three-round Delphi study and expert workshop were conducted: An expert panel rated mitigation behaviours impacted by COVID-19 in relation to their importance regarding health impacts and climate change mitigation using a five-point Likert scale. Consensus on the importance of target behaviours was determined by interquartile ranges. In total, seven target behaviours were prioritised: installing double/triple glazing; installing cavity wall insulation; installing solid wall insulation; moving away from meat/emission heavy diets; reducing the number of cars per household; walking shorter journeys; and reducing day/weekend leisure car journeys. Barriers related to the costs associated with performing behaviours and a lack of complementary policy-regulated subsidies. The target behaviours are consistent with recommendations from previous research. To ensure public uptake, interventions should address behavioural facilitators and barriers, dovetail climate change mitigation with health co-benefits and account for the long-term impacts of COVID-19 on these behaviours.

摘要

气候变化需要紧急行动,但确定应该优先考虑的个人行为以实现最大影响可能具有挑战性。本研究旨在根据气候变化和公共卫生的影响对减缓气候变化的行为进行优先排序,并确定相关的障碍和促进因素——探索与英国 COVID-19 相关的观察到的行为转变的影响。进行了三轮 Delphi 研究和专家研讨会:一个专家小组使用五点李克特量表,根据 COVID-19 对健康影响和气候变化缓解的重要性,对受 COVID-19 影响的减缓行为进行评估。目标行为的重要性的共识是通过四分位间距确定的。共有七种目标行为被优先考虑:安装双层/三层玻璃窗;安装空心墙绝缘材料;安装实心墙绝缘材料;减少肉类/排放量大的饮食;减少每户汽车数量;步行短途旅行;减少日常/周末休闲驾车旅行。行为相关的障碍与行为相关的成本以及缺乏互补的政策监管补贴有关。目标行为与先前研究的建议一致。为确保公众参与,干预措施应解决行为促进因素和障碍,将气候变化缓解与健康共同效益联系起来,并考虑 COVID-19 对这些行为的长期影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a23/10049208/89e95a3e16d6/ijerph-20-05094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a23/10049208/89e95a3e16d6/ijerph-20-05094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a23/10049208/89e95a3e16d6/ijerph-20-05094-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritising Climate Change Mitigation Behaviours and Exploring Public Health Co-Benefits: A Delphi Study.优先考虑气候变化缓解行为并探索公共卫生共同效益:德尔菲研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;20(6):5094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065094.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.空气污染的健康协同效益和《巴黎协定》的缓解成本:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
Positive Externalities of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation for Human Health: A Review and Conceptual Framework for Public Health Research.气候变化减缓与适应对人类健康的正外部性:公共卫生研究的综述与概念框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 3;18(5):2481. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052481.
5
Labour productivity and economic impacts of carbon mitigation: a modelling study and benefit-cost analysis.碳减排的劳动生产率与经济影响:一项建模研究及效益成本分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Dec;6(12):e941-e948. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00245-5.
6
New Zealand's Climate Change Commission report: the critical need to address the missing health co-benefits of reducing emissions.新西兰气候变化委员会报告:减少排放带来的缺失健康协同效益亟待解决。
N Z Med J. 2021 Sep 17;134(1542):109-118.
7
Household preferences for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in four European high-income countries: Does health information matter? A mixed-methods study protocol.四个欧洲高收入国家家庭减少温室气体排放的偏好:健康信息重要吗?一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4604-1.
8
Assessing the barriers and facilitators of climate action planning in local governments: a two-round survey of expert opinion.评估地方政府气候行动计划制定的障碍和促进因素:专家意见的两轮调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16853-8.
9
Priorities for research to support local authority action on health and climate change: a study in England.支持地方当局在健康和气候变化方面采取行动的研究重点:英格兰的一项研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):1965. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16717-1.
10
Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies.减缓气候变化情景的辅助健康效益作为政策采纳的驱动因素:空气质量、交通和饮食共同效益建模研究综述
Environ Res Lett. 2017 Nov;12(11). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f7b. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
City tourism pre- and post-covid-19 pandemic - Messages to take home for climate change adaptation and mitigation?新冠疫情前后的城市旅游业——应对气候变化适应与缓解可借鉴的经验?
J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2020 Sep;31:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100329. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
2
Why tackling climate change mitigation and human health together is the best way forward.
BMJ. 2021 Nov 5;375:n2707. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2707.
3
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
4
Behaviour change to address climate change.为应对气候变化而进行的行为改变。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for accelerating sustainable development.新冠疫情对加速可持续发展的启示
Environ Res. 2021 Feb;193:110482. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110482. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Health impacts and environmental footprints of diets that meet the Eatwell Guide recommendations: analyses of multiple UK studies.符合《健康饮食指南》建议的饮食对健康的影响及环境足迹:多项英国研究分析
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e037554. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037554.
7
Erratum: Publisher Correction: Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19.勘误:出版商更正:2019冠状病毒病对当前及未来全球气候的影响
Nat Clim Chang. 2020;10(10):971. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-0904-z. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
8
Building a Social Mandate for Climate Action: Lessons from COVID-19.为气候行动建立社会授权:来自新冠疫情的教训
Environ Resour Econ (Dordr). 2020;76(4):1107-1115. doi: 10.1007/s10640-020-00446-9. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Alternative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions to promote action on climate change yields different conclusions.对促进气候变化行动的行为干预措施进行的替代荟萃分析得出了不同的结论。
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 5;11(1):3915. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17613-7.
10
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural interventions to promote household action on climate change.随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以测试促进家庭采取行动应对气候变化的行为干预措施。
Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 4;10(1):4545. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12457-2.