• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Preliminary impact of the adoption of the Icelandic Prevention Model in Tarragona City, 2015-2019: A repeated cross-sectional study.2015-2019 年在塔拉戈纳市采用冰岛预防模式的初步影响:一项重复的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;11:1117857. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117857. eCollection 2023.
2
Trends in substance use and primary prevention variables among adolescents in Lithuania, 2006-19.2006-2019 年立陶宛青少年物质使用和初级预防变量趋势
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):7-12. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa097.
3
Testing risk and protective factor assumptions in the Icelandic model of adolescent substance use prevention.测试冰岛青少年物质使用预防模式中的风险和保护因素假设。
Health Educ Res. 2021 Jul 12;36(3):309-318. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaa052.
4
Depressive symptoms, mental wellbeing, and substance use among adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iceland: a longitudinal, population-based study.冰岛青少年在新冠疫情之前及期间的抑郁症状、心理健康和物质使用情况:一项基于人群的纵向研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;8(8):663-672. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00156-5. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Community-Based Prevention of Substance Use in Adolescents: Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Santiago, Chile.基于社区的青少年物质使用预防:智利圣地亚哥在 COVID-19 大流行之前和期间的结果。
Prev Sci. 2024 Feb;25(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01539-9. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Adolescent substance use, parental monitoring, and leisure-time activities: 12-year outcomes of primary prevention in Iceland.青少年物质使用、父母监督和闲暇活动:冰岛初级预防的 12 年结果。
Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 15.
7
Trends in prevalence of substance use among Icelandic adolescents, 1995-2006.1995 - 2006年冰岛青少年物质使用流行趋势
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 May 28;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-12.
8
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health and substance use up to March, 2022, in Iceland: a repeated, cross-sectional, population-based study.2022 年 3 月前 COVID-19 大流行对冰岛青少年心理健康和物质使用的影响:一项重复的、横断面的、基于人群的研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 May;7(5):347-357. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00022-6. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
9
Population trends in smoking, alcohol use and primary prevention variables among adolescents in Iceland, 1997-2014.1997 - 2014年冰岛青少年吸烟、饮酒及一级预防变量的人口趋势
Addiction. 2016 Apr;111(4):645-52. doi: 10.1111/add.13248. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
10
Substance use prevention for adolescents: the Icelandic Model.青少年物质使用预防:冰岛模式。
Health Promot Int. 2009 Mar;24(1):16-25. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dan038. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of adolescent stimulant drug use: Do the home life environment and extracurricular activities influence this? Findings from the Irish Planet Youth Survey.预防青少年使用兴奋剂药物:家庭生活环境和课外活动对此有影响吗?来自爱尔兰“星球青年”调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0330489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330489. eCollection 2025.
2
The Impact of Place-Based Approaches Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature.基于场所的方法对青少年心理健康和物质使用的影响:文献系统综述
Public Health Rev. 2025 Feb 14;45:1607955. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1607955. eCollection 2024.
3
Processes of development related with the implementation of the Icelandic prevention model in a rural Canadian community.与在加拿大农村社区实施冰岛预防模式相关的发展过程。
Discov Public Health. 2025;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12982-025-00443-7. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
4
Role of relative-reinforcement value of alcohol-free activities during recovery from alcohol use disorder in an adult clinical sample.酒精使用障碍康复过程中无酒精活动的相对强化价值在成人临床样本中的作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Aug;32(4):410-417. doi: 10.1037/pha0000713. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
5
Mental health and well-being for the prevention of substance use disorders.预防物质使用障碍的心理健康与幸福。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;66(Suppl 2):S272-S282. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_716_23. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Community mobilisation approaches to preventing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review.社区动员方法预防青少年多种风险行为:一个现实主义的综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 26;13(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02450-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Initiation of and Escalation to High-Intensity Drinking in Young Adults.年轻人开始并升级为高强度饮酒。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Mar 1;177(3):286-293. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.5642.
2
Trends and consumption patterns in the use of e-cigarettes among adolescents and young adults in Germany (the DEBRA study).德国青少年和年轻成年人电子烟使用的趋势和消费模式(DEBRA 研究)。
Addict Behav. 2022 Oct;133:107375. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107375. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Preventing tobacco use from the start: Short- and medium-term impacts on the youth.从源头预防烟草使用:对青少年的短期和中期影响。
Health Policy. 2022 Aug;126(8):831-836. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
The burden of mental disorders, substance use disorders and self-harm among young people in Europe, 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990 - 2019年欧洲年轻人的精神障碍、物质使用障碍和自我伤害负担:全球疾病负担研究2019的结果
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Apr 1;16:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100341. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Fairness of the Distribution of Public Medical and Health Resources.公共医疗卫生资源分配公平性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 10;9:768728. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.768728. eCollection 2021.
6
Testing risk and protective factor assumptions in the Icelandic model of adolescent substance use prevention.测试冰岛青少年物质使用预防模式中的风险和保护因素假设。
Health Educ Res. 2021 Jul 12;36(3):309-318. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaa052.
7
Trends in substance use and primary prevention variables among adolescents in Lithuania, 2006-19.2006-2019 年立陶宛青少年物质使用和初级预防变量趋势
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):7-12. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa097.
8
Adolescent Substance Use and the Brain: Behavioral, Cognitive and Neuroimaging Correlates.青少年物质使用与大脑:行为、认知及神经影像学关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 4;14:298. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00298. eCollection 2020.
9
Patterns of Mean Age at Drug Use Initiation Among Adolescents and Emerging Adults, 2004-2017.青少年和刚成年期人群的药物使用起始平均年龄模式,2004-2017 年。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jul 1;174(7):725-727. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6235.
10
Prevention Is Possible: A Brief History of the Origin and Dissemination of the Icelandic Prevention Model.预防是可能的:冰岛预防模式的起源与传播简史。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1):58-61. doi: 10.1177/1524839919886314.

2015-2019 年在塔拉戈纳市采用冰岛预防模式的初步影响:一项重复的横断面研究。

Preliminary impact of the adoption of the Icelandic Prevention Model in Tarragona City, 2015-2019: A repeated cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Planet Youth Ltd., Reykjavik, Iceland.

Department of Community and Environmental Health, School of Allied Health Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;11:1117857. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117857. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1117857
PMID:37006583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10061134/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a great need for effective primary prevention intervention strategies to reduce and delay onset of adolescent substance use. The Icelandic Prevention Model (IPM) showed great success in Iceland over the past twenty plus years, however, evidence for the transferability of model is still somewhat limited. Using data collected in Tarragona during regional efforts to begin adoption of the IPM in Catalonia, this study tested the transferability and stability of the core risk and protective factor assumptions of the IPM overtime and examined trends of lifetime smoking, e-cigarette-use, alcohol-use, intoxication, and cannabis-use within the same time period.

METHODS

This study includes responses from 15- to 16-years-olds from two region-wide samples taken in 2015 and 2019 in Tarragona ( = 2,867). Survey questions assessed frequency of lifetime: smoking, e-cigarette-use, alcohol-use, intoxication, and cannabis-use, and the core model assumptions. Demographic data were also collected. Logistic regression models of main effects with and without time interaction were used to test assumptions and their stability across time. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare prevalence of substance use and mean scores of primary prevention variables respectively.

RESULTS

Lifetime: smoking (-7%, < 0.001) and cannabis-use (-4%, < 0.001) decreased, and e-cigarette-use increased (+33%, < 0.001) in Tarragona. Lifetime intoxication (-7%, < 0.001) decreased in a single zone exclusively. Most core model assumptions held in their hypothesised direction across time. The strongest positive association was observed between time spent with parents during weekends and reduced odds of lifetime smoking (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.57-0.67) and the strongest negative association was observed between being outside after midnight and increased odds of lifetime intoxication (OR: 1.41, 95%CI: 1.32-1.51). Mean scores of primary prevention variables also changed disproportionately in Tarragona.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the core IPM assumptions are similar in Tarragona as in Iceland and other contexts previously examined. They also indicate that prevalence of lifetime smoking, intoxication, and cannabis-use decreased disproportionately in Tarragona between 2015 and 2019 during the first phase of regional adoption of the model. Thus, targeting model assumptions represents a viable primary prevention strategy for communities that hope to reduce smoking, alcohol-use, intoxication, and cannabis-use among adolescents.

摘要

背景

非常需要有效的初级预防干预策略来减少和延迟青少年物质使用的发生。冰岛预防模式(IPM)在过去二十多年中在冰岛取得了巨大成功,然而,模型可转移性的证据仍然有些有限。本研究利用在塔拉戈纳收集的数据,在加泰罗尼亚地区努力采用 IPM 的过程中,检验了该模型的核心风险和保护因素假设在不同时期的可转移性和稳定性,并在同一时期内研究了终生吸烟、电子烟使用、饮酒、醉酒和大麻使用的趋势。

方法

本研究包括来自 2015 年和 2019 年在塔拉戈纳进行的两次全地区样本中 15 至 16 岁青少年的回答(n=2867)。调查问题评估了终生:吸烟、电子烟使用、饮酒、醉酒和大麻使用的频率,以及核心模型假设。还收集了人口统计学数据。使用带有和不带有时间交互的主要效应逻辑回归模型来测试假设及其在不同时间的稳定性。使用卡方检验和 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U 检验分别比较物质使用的流行率和初级预防变量的平均得分。

结果

在塔拉戈纳,终生:吸烟(-7%,<0.001)和大麻使用(-4%,<0.001)减少,电子烟使用增加(+33%,<0.001)。在一个单独的区域,仅终生醉酒(-7%,<0.001)减少。大多数核心模型假设在其假设的方向上保持一致。观察到周末与父母共度的时间与减少终生吸烟的几率之间存在最强的正相关(OR:0.62,95%CI:0.57-0.67),而观察到午夜后外出与增加终生醉酒几率之间存在最强的负相关(OR:1.41,95%CI:1.32-1.51)。初级预防变量的平均得分也在塔拉戈纳不成比例地发生了变化。

结论

本研究证实,塔拉戈纳的 IPM 核心假设与冰岛和以前检查过的其他背景下的假设相似。它们还表明,在 2015 年至 2019 年期间,在模型的区域采用的第一阶段,塔拉戈纳的终生吸烟、醉酒和大麻使用的流行率不成比例地减少。因此,针对模型假设代表了希望减少青少年吸烟、饮酒、醉酒和大麻使用的社区的可行初级预防策略。