Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Universidad de Chile, Avenida La Paz 1003, Recoleta, Santiago, Chile.
Doctorado en Psicoterapia, Facultad de Medicina y Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Chile y Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Prev Sci. 2024 Feb;25(2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01539-9. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
A primary community prevention approach in Iceland was associated with strong reductions of substance use in adolescents. Two years into the implementation of this prevention model in Chile, the aim of this study was to assess changes in the prevalence of adolescent alcohol and cannabis use and to discuss the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the substance use outcomes. In 2018, six municipalities in Greater Santiago, Chile, implemented the Icelandic prevention model, including structured assessments of prevalence and risk factors of substance use in tenth grade high school students every 2 years. The survey allows municipalities and schools to work on prevention with prevalence data from their own community. The survey was modified from an on-site paper format in 2018 to an on-line digital format in a shortened version in 2020. Comparisons between the cross-sectional surveys in the years 2018 and 2020 were performed with multilevel logistic regressions. Totally, 7538 participants were surveyed in 2018 and 5528 in 2020, nested in 125 schools from the six municipalities. Lifetime alcohol use decreased from 79.8% in 2018 to 70.0% in 2020 (X = 139.3, p < 0.01), past-month alcohol use decreased from 45.5 to 33.4% (X = 171.2, p < 0.01), and lifetime cannabis use decrease from 27.9 to 18.8% (X = 127.4, p < 0.01). Several risk factors improved between 2018 and 2020: staying out of home after 10 p.m. (X = 105.6, p < 0.01), alcohol use in friends (X = 31.8, p < 0.01), drunkenness in friends (X = 251.4, p < 0.01), and cannabis use in friends (X = 217.7, p < 0.01). However, other factors deteriorated in 2020: perceived parenting (X = 63.8, p < 0.01), depression and anxiety symptoms (X = 23.5, p < 0.01), and low parental rejection of alcohol use (X = 24.9, p < 0.01). The interaction between alcohol use in friends and year was significant for lifetime alcohol use (β = 0.29, p < 0.01) and past-month alcohol use (β = 0.24, p < 0.01), and the interaction between depression and anxiety symptoms and year was significant for lifetime alcohol use (β = 0.34, p < 0.01), past-month alcohol use (β = 0.33, p < 0.01), and lifetime cannabis use (β = 0.26, p = 0.016). The decrease of substance use prevalence in adolescents was attributable at least in part to a reduction of alcohol use in friends. This could be related to social distancing policies, curfews, and homeschooling during the pandemic in Chile that implied less physical interactions between adolescents. The increase of depression and anxiety symptoms may also be related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The factors rather attributable to the prevention intervention did not show substantial changes (i.e., sports activities, parenting, and extracurricular activities).
冰岛的初级社区预防方法与青少年物质使用的大幅减少有关。智利在实施这种预防模式两年后,本研究旨在评估青少年酒精和大麻使用的流行率变化,并讨论 COVID-19 大流行对物质使用结果的影响。2018 年,智利圣地亚哥大都市区的六个城市实施了冰岛预防模式,包括每两年对十年级高中生进行一次物质使用的流行率和风险因素的结构化评估。该调查允许市和学校根据自己社区的流行率数据进行预防工作。该调查从 2018 年的现场纸质格式修改为 2020 年的在线数字格式,并缩短了版本。使用多层逻辑回归对 2018 年和 2020 年的横断面调查进行了比较。共有 125 所学校的 7538 名参与者参加了 2018 年的调查,5528 名参与者参加了 2020 年的调查。终生饮酒率从 2018 年的 79.8%降至 2020 年的 70.0%(X=139.3,p<0.01),过去一个月的饮酒率从 45.5%降至 33.4%(X=171.2,p<0.01),终生大麻使用率从 27.9%降至 18.8%(X=127.4,p<0.01)。2018 年至 2020 年期间,几个风险因素有所改善:晚上 10 点以后不在家(X=105.6,p<0.01)、朋友中的酒精使用(X=31.8,p<0.01)、朋友中的醉酒(X=251.4,p<0.01)和朋友中的大麻使用(X=217.7,p<0.01)。然而,2020 年其他因素恶化:感知到的父母教养(X=63.8,p<0.01)、抑郁和焦虑症状(X=23.5,p<0.01)以及父母对酒精使用的低拒绝(X=24.9,p<0.01)。朋友中饮酒与年份之间的交互作用对终生饮酒(β=0.29,p<0.01)和过去一个月的饮酒(β=0.24,p<0.01)以及抑郁和焦虑症状与年份之间的交互作用对终生饮酒(β=0.34,p<0.01)、过去一个月的饮酒(β=0.33,p<0.01)和终生大麻使用(β=0.26,p=0.016)有显著影响。青少年物质使用流行率的下降至少部分归因于朋友中饮酒量的减少。这可能与智利大流行期间的社交距离政策、宵禁和在家上学有关,这意味着青少年之间的身体互动减少。抑郁和焦虑症状的增加也可能与 COVID-19 大流行有关。而那些更可能归因于预防干预的因素并没有发生实质性变化(即体育活动、父母教养和课外活动)。