• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对被派往院外心脏骤停现场的志愿者急救人员的HeartRunner问卷内容效度:一项定性研究。

Content validation of the HeartRunner questionnaire to volunteer responders dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Brautsch Louise Ayoe Sparvath, Zinckernagel Line, Kragh Astrid Marie Rolin, Hansen Carolina Malta, Kristensen Astrid Lykke Storgaard, Andersen Susan

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, Copenhagen, Denmark.

The Danish Committee for Health Education, Classensgade 71, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2023 Mar 24;14:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100378. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100378
PMID:37007187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10050778/
Abstract

AIM

To increase survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in Denmark, volunteer responders are activated through a smartphone application (HeartRunner app) to quickly locate an automated external defibrillator (AED) and assist with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). All dispatched volunteer responders who have been activated by the app receive a follow-up questionnaire to evaluate their participation in the programme. The content of the questionnaire has never been thoroughly evaluated. We therefore aimed to validate the content of the questionnaire.

METHODS

Content validity was evaluated qualitatively. It was based on individual interviews with three experts, along with three focus group interviews and five individual interviews using cognitive interview technique, with a total of 19 volunteer responders. The interviews were also used to inform refinements of the questionnaire to reach improvements in content validity.

RESULTS

The initial questionnaire consisted of 23 items. After the content validation process, the questionnaire consisted of 32 items; with the addition of 9 new items. Specifically, some original items were merged into one item or divided into separate items. Moreover, we revised the order of items, some sentences were rephrased or reworded, an introduction and headlines to different sections were added, and skip logic were incorporated to hide non-relevant items.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the importance of validating questionnaires to ensure accuracy of survey instruments. Validation led to modifications of the questionnaire, and we propose a new version of the HeartRunner questionnaire. Our findings support the content validity of the final HeartRunner questionnaire. The questionnaire may allow the collection of quality data to evaluate and improve volunteer responder programmes.

摘要

目的

为提高丹麦院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的生存率,通过一款智能手机应用程序(HeartRunner应用)激活志愿者急救人员,以便快速找到自动体外除颤器(AED)并协助进行心肺复苏(CPR)。所有通过该应用程序被激活并派遣的志愿者急救人员都会收到一份后续调查问卷,以评估他们对该项目的参与情况。该调查问卷的内容从未经过全面评估。因此,我们旨在验证该调查问卷的内容。

方法

采用定性方法评估内容效度。基于对三位专家的个人访谈、三次焦点小组访谈以及运用认知访谈技术对19名志愿者急救人员进行的五次个人访谈。这些访谈还用于为改进调查问卷提供信息,以提高内容效度。

结果

最初的调查问卷包含23个项目。经过内容验证过程后,调查问卷包含32个项目,新增了9个项目。具体而言,一些原始项目被合并为一个项目或拆分为单独的项目。此外,我们修改了项目顺序,重新表述或改写了一些句子,添加了不同部分的引言和标题,并纳入了跳答逻辑以隐藏不相关的项目。

结论

我们的研究结果支持验证调查问卷以确保调查工具准确性的重要性。验证导致了调查问卷的修改,我们提出了HeartRunner调查问卷的新版本。我们的研究结果支持最终HeartRunner调查问卷的内容效度。该调查问卷可能有助于收集高质量数据,以评估和改进志愿者急救人员项目。

相似文献

1
Content validation of the HeartRunner questionnaire to volunteer responders dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: A qualitative study.针对被派往院外心脏骤停现场的志愿者急救人员的HeartRunner问卷内容效度:一项定性研究。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Mar 24;14:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100378. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.智能手机激活公民响应者,以促进院外心脏骤停时的除颤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073.
3
Risk of Physical Injury for Dispatched Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.派遣公民对院外心脏骤停者进行急救的身体伤害风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e021626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021626. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Collaboration between emergency physicians and citizen responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.急诊医师与公民响应者在院外心脏骤停复苏中的合作。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 3;29(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00927-w.
5
Use of automated external defibrillators in cardiac arrest: an evidence-based analysis.心脏骤停时自动体外除颤器的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(19):1-29. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
6
Volunteer responder provision of support to relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a qualitative study.志愿者为院外心脏骤停患者家属提供支持:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 21;13(3):e071220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071220.
7
Immediate psychological impact on citizen responders dispatched through a mobile application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.通过移动应用程序派遣至院外心脏骤停现场的民众急救人员的即时心理影响。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Aug 13;7:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100155. eCollection 2021 Sep.
8
A smartphone application for dispatch of lay responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.一款用于派遣非专业急救人员对院外心脏骤停进行急救的智能手机应用。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Identifying and overcoming barriers to automated external defibrillator use by GoodSAM volunteer first responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架和行为改变轮,对 GoodSAM 志愿者急救人员在院外心脏骤停中使用自动体外除颤器所面临的障碍进行识别和克服:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 10;10(3):e034908. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034908.
10
Follow-up on volunteer responders dispatched for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: Addressing the psychological and physical impact.对因院外心脏骤停而被派遣的志愿急救人员的随访:应对心理和身体影响。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 1;14:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100402. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of screening tools for mild cognitive impairment in older adults based on COSMIN guidelines: a systematic review.基于COSMIN指南的老年人轻度认知障碍筛查工具的心理测量学特性:一项系统综述
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06030-4.
2
Defining the terminology of first responders alerted for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by medical dispatch centres: An international consensus study on nomenclature.界定医疗调度中心为院外心脏骤停发出警报的急救人员术语:一项关于命名的国际共识研究
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 20;22:100912. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100912. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Follow-up on volunteer responders dispatched for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: Addressing the psychological and physical impact.对因院外心脏骤停而被派遣的志愿急救人员的随访:应对心理和身体影响。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 1;14:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100402. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.智能手机激活公民响应者,以促进院外心脏骤停时的除颤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073.
2
Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders- a systematic review.评估心理困扰评估工具:如何测量公民应急响应者的心理应激反应——一项系统综述
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6.
3
A smartphone application for dispatch of lay responders to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.一款用于派遣非专业急救人员对院外心脏骤停进行急救的智能手机应用。
Resuscitation. 2018 May;126:160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
The use of trained volunteers in the response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - the GoodSAM experience.在院外心脏骤停反应中使用经过培训的志愿者 - GoodSAM 经验。
Resuscitation. 2017 Dec;121:123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
5
Modifiable Factors Associated With Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study.与泛亚洲复苏结果研究中院外心脏骤停后生存相关的可改变因素。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):608-617.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.07.484. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第5部分:成人基础生命支持和心肺复苏质量:2015美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南更新
Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S414-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000259.
7
Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis.系统文本浓缩:一种定性分析策略。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030.
8
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
9
Likert scales: how to (ab)use them.李克特量表:如何(滥)用它们。
Med Educ. 2004 Dec;38(12):1217-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
10
Focus groups.焦点小组
Int J Qual Health Care. 1996 Oct;8(5):499-504. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499.