• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)作为重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡率的指标:一项队列研究。

APACHE scoring as an indicator of mortality rate in ICU patients: a cohort study.

作者信息

Mumtaz Hassan, Ejaz Muhammad K, Tayyab Muhammad, Vohra Laiba I, Sapkota Shova, Hasan Mohammad, Saqib Muhammad

机构信息

Health Services Academy, Islamabad.

Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, Punjab.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 24;85(3):416-421. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000264. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000000264
PMID:37008173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10060092/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Predictive scoring systems are tools that assess the magnitude of a patient's illness and forecast disease prognosis, usually in the form of mortality, in the ICU. We aimed to determine the mortality rate among patients admitted to ICU using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system correlating with lengths of stay in the ICU.

METHODOLOGY

A cohort study using team approach to care was conducted from July 2021 through July 2022 at KRL Hospital. Five hundred fifty-two patients aged 18-40 years, admitted for medical or surgical reasons (other than cardiac) who stayed in the ICU for more than 24 h were included. The APACHE II score was determined using 12 physiological variables at the end of the first 24 h of ICU admission. Data were analyzed using IBM Corp. released in 2015 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0, Armonk, New York).

RESULTS

The average age of study participants was 36.34±2.77, ranging from 18 to 40 years. Three hundred fifteen participants were males and 237 were females. Patients were categorized into four separate groups as per their respective APACHE II scores. Patients with an APACHE II score of 31-40 were assigned to group 1. Patients with an APACHE II score of 21-30 were assigned to group 2. Patients with an APACHE II score of 11-20 were assigned to group 3. Lastly, patients with an APACHE II score of 3-10 were assigned to group 4. All patients in group 1 and group 2 died and none survived. Groups 1 and 2 contained a sum of 228 patients. A total of 123 patients were assigned to group 3, out of which 88 patients (71.54%) survived and 35 patients (28.45%) died. From these observations, it is evident that a higher APACHE II score is correlated with increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

APACHE II scoring serves as an early warning indication of death and prompts clinicians to upgrade their treatment protocol. This makes it a useful tool for the clinical prediction of ICU mortality.

摘要

未标注

预测评分系统是评估患者疾病严重程度并预测疾病预后的工具,通常以重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的形式呈现。我们旨在使用急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)评分系统确定入住ICU患者的死亡率,并将其与在ICU的住院时长相关联。

方法

2021年7月至2022年7月在KRL医院开展了一项采用团队护理方法的队列研究。纳入552例年龄在18至40岁之间、因医疗或手术原因(非心脏原因)入住ICU且住院时间超过24小时的患者。在入住ICU的前24小时结束时,使用12项生理变量确定APACHE II评分。数据使用IBM公司2015年发布的软件(IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,版本23.0,纽约州阿蒙克)进行分析。

结果

研究参与者的平均年龄为36.34±2.77岁,年龄范围为18至40岁。315名参与者为男性,237名参与者为女性。根据各自的APACHE II评分,将患者分为四个不同的组。APACHE II评分为31 - 40的患者被分配到第1组。APACHE II评分为21 - 30的患者被分配到第2组。APACHE II评分为11 - 20的患者被分配到第3组。最后,APACHE II评分为3 - 10的患者被分配到第4组。第1组和第2组的所有患者均死亡,无一存活。第1组和第2组共有228例患者。共有123例患者被分配到第3组,其中88例患者(71.54%)存活,35例患者(28.45%)死亡。从这些观察结果可以明显看出,较高的APACHE II评分与死亡率增加相关。

结论

APACHE II评分可作为死亡的早期预警指标,并促使临床医生升级治疗方案。这使其成为ICU死亡率临床预测的有用工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/4901cb79be90/ms9-85-416-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/1f0bc5a14f1f/ms9-85-416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/7e276a3e1152/ms9-85-416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/d075955bdf20/ms9-85-416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/4901cb79be90/ms9-85-416-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/1f0bc5a14f1f/ms9-85-416-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/7e276a3e1152/ms9-85-416-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/d075955bdf20/ms9-85-416-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d752/10060092/4901cb79be90/ms9-85-416-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
APACHE scoring as an indicator of mortality rate in ICU patients: a cohort study.急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)作为重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡率的指标:一项队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 24;85(3):416-421. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000264. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
3
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.
4
Intensive Care Admissions in Pregnancy: Analysis of a Level of Support Scoring System.妊娠期重症监护病房入院情况:支持水平评分系统分析
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jan;20(1):106-113. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1808-9.
5
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
6
[Clinical characteristics of critically ill pregnant women with different admission methods to intensive care unit: data analysis from 2006 to 2019 in the university hospital].[重症监护病房不同收治方式的危重症孕妇临床特征:某大学医院2006年至2019年数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Oct;33(10):1249-1254. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210106-00013.
7
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score for the assessment of mortality prediction in the intensive care unit: a single-centre study from Iran.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 对重症监护病房死亡率预测的评估:来自伊朗的单中心研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2019 Nov;24(6):375-380. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12401. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
[Risk factors for death in elderly patients admitted to intensive care unit after elective abdominal surgery: a consecutive 5-year retrospective study].择期腹部手术后入住重症监护病房老年患者的死亡危险因素:一项连续5年的回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Dec;33(12):1453-1458. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210804-00118.
9
[A new warning scoring system establishment for prediction of sepsis in patients with trauma in intensive care unit].[一种用于预测重症监护病房创伤患者脓毒症的新预警评分系统的建立]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):422-427. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.010.
10
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting 28-day mortality for patients with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke following endovascular treatment in neurology intensive care units.预测神经内科重症监护病房内行血管内治疗的急性前循环大血管闭塞性卒中患者的28天死亡率。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1630773. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1630773. eCollection 2025.
2
The effects of Dexmedetomidine on Recovery from Acute KIdney INjury (DRAIN): a single-center retrospective review using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, fourth edition (MIMIC-IV).右美托咪定对急性肾损伤恢复的影响(DRAIN):一项使用重症监护医学信息集市第四版(MIMIC-IV)的单中心回顾性研究
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 Aug 20;16:20420986251367509. doi: 10.1177/20420986251367509. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive accuracy of the APACHE IV scores on mortality and prolonged stay in the intensive care unit of Dr Sardjito Hospital.APACHE IV 评分对 Sardjito 医院重症监护病房死亡率和住院时间延长的预测准确性。
Med J Malaysia. 2022 Jul;77(Suppl 1):53-58.
2
Mortality Predictive Value of APACHE II and SOFA Scores in COVID-19 Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.COVID-19 患者 ICU 中 APACHE II 和 SOFA 评分的死亡率预测价值。
Can Respir J. 2022 Mar 28;2022:5129314. doi: 10.1155/2022/5129314. eCollection 2022.
3
Dynamic APACHE II Score to Predict the Outcome of Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Multiplex Targeted Proteomic Analysis of Cytokine Ratios for ICU Mortality in Severe COVID-19.用于重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者重症监护病房死亡率的细胞因子比值多重靶向蛋白质组学分析
Proteomes. 2025 Aug 2;13(3):35. doi: 10.3390/proteomes13030035.
4
Clinical aspects and short-term prognosis in a cohort of patients with infective endocarditis, São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗感染性心内膜炎患者队列的临床特征及短期预后
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2025 Jul 28;59:e20250060. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2025-0060en. eCollection 2025.
5
Prognostic nutritional index as a potential predictor of prognosis in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.预后营养指数作为脓毒症患者预后的潜在预测指标:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 1;12:1600943. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1600943. eCollection 2025.
6
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Intensive Care Medicine: Critical Recalibrations from Rule-Based Systems to Frontier Models.重症监护医学中的机器学习与人工智能:从基于规则的系统到前沿模型的关键重新校准
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4026. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124026.
7
Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Pneumonia Patients Aged 80 and Above in Intensive Care.中性粒细胞与白蛋白比值作为80岁及以上重症肺炎患者的预后标志物
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3033. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093033.
8
Diaphragmatic ultrasound and its relationship to breathing effort and load: a prospective observational study.膈肌超声及其与呼吸功和负荷的关系:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2025 May 13;29(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05436-1.
9
Evaluation of the physiological variables and scoring systems at intensive care discharge as predictors of clinical deterioration and readmission: a single-centre retrospective study.评估重症监护病房出院时的生理变量和评分系统作为临床恶化和再入院预测指标的研究:一项单中心回顾性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 7;15(5):e099352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099352.
10
Predictors of sepsis, intensive care unit admission, and death in patients hospitalized for complicated skin and soft tissue infections: Retrospective study at a large tertiary-care center.因复杂皮肤及软组织感染住院患者发生脓毒症、入住重症监护病房及死亡的预测因素:在一家大型三级医疗中心进行的回顾性研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2025 Apr 26;13:20503121251336069. doi: 10.1177/20503121251336069. eCollection 2025.
动态急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II预测重症监护病房患者的预后
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;8:744907. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.744907. eCollection 2021.
4
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Comparison of the Performance of APACHE II, SOFA, and mNUTRIC Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients: A 2-year Cross-sectional Study.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和改良营养风险及预后评估(mNUTRIC)评分系统在危重症患者中的性能比较:一项为期2年的横断面研究
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(11):1057-1061. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23549.
6
Evaluating ICU Clinical Severity Scoring Systems and Machine Learning Applications: APACHE IV/IVa Case Study.评估重症监护病房临床严重程度评分系统及机器学习应用:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV/IVa案例研究
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4073-4076. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513324.
7
Causes of death in intensive care patients with a low APACHE II score.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)得分低的重症监护患者的死亡原因。
Neth J Med. 2012 Dec;70(10):455-9.
8
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81.
9
Accuracy and reliability of APACHE II scoring in two intensive care units Problems and pitfalls in the use of APACHE II and suggestions for improvement.两个重症监护病房中急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分的准确性和可靠性:APACHE II使用中的问题与陷阱及改进建议
Anaesthesia. 2001 Jan;56(1):47-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01763.x.