Casimiro-Iriarte Sophia-Alejandra, Chiok-Ocaña Lourdes-Rosa
DDS., Master Student in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Sciences of Life and Health, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
DDS. MSc. PhD., Professor Division of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Sciences of Life and Health, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Mar 1;15(3):e187-e194. doi: 10.4317/jced.60022. eCollection 2023 Mar.
The aim of this study was to compare the fluoride release from fluoride varnishes exposed to commonly consumed beverages.
One hundred and twenty acrylic blocks were divided randomly into ten experimental groups (n= 12 per group). For the experiment, 24 blocks were prepared for each fluoride varnish (Duraphat®, Duofluorid XII®, Clinpro™, MI Varnish™ and Profluorid®). The blocks were placed into artificial saliva for 30 minutes and in carbonated beverage or fruit juice for up to 24 hours. Artificial saliva and beverages were evaluated to determine the fluoride release using an ion-selective electrode. Data were analyzed using ANOVA F, Friedman and Kruskal Wallis test for bivariate analysis; and three-way ANOVA (fluoride varnish, beverages, exposure time).
When the fluoride varnishes were compared according to each exposure time, a statistically significant difference was found between all the fluoride varnishes for each evaluation time on carbonated beverage and fruit juice. MI Varnish™ presented the highest fluoride release in carbonated beverage (94.44±5.47ppm) and fruit juice (126.16±8.89ppm) at 8 hours. Duraphat® presented the lowest fluoride release at baseline (0.44±0.08ppm) for carbonated beverage group. A three-way comparison between fluoride release, exposure time and fluoride varnish were statistically significant (<0.001). When evaluating the effect of the three independent variables together on fluoride release, it was found that the variables fluoride varnish (<0.001) and exposure time (<0.001) contributed to the release of fluoride.
The type of fluoride varnish and the time after the application contribute to the fluoride release model. Fluorides, topical, sodium fluoride, beverages.
本研究的目的是比较暴露于常见消费饮料中的氟化物清漆的氟释放情况。
120个丙烯酸块随机分为10个实验组(每组n = 12)。实验中,每种氟化物清漆(Duraphat®、Duofluorid XII®、Clinpro™、MI Varnish™和Profluorid®)制备24个块。将这些块置于人工唾液中30分钟,然后置于碳酸饮料或果汁中长达24小时。使用离子选择性电极评估人工唾液和饮料以确定氟释放情况。数据采用方差分析F、Friedman检验和Kruskal Wallis检验进行双变量分析;以及三因素方差分析(氟化物清漆、饮料、暴露时间)。
根据每个暴露时间比较氟化物清漆时,在碳酸饮料和果汁的每个评估时间,所有氟化物清漆之间均存在统计学显著差异。MI Varnish™在8小时时在碳酸饮料(94.44±5.47ppm)和果汁(126.16±8.89ppm)中呈现出最高的氟释放量。对于碳酸饮料组,Duraphat®在基线时(0.44±0.08ppm)呈现出最低的氟释放量。氟释放、暴露时间和氟化物清漆之间的三因素比较具有统计学显著性(<0.001)。当一起评估三个自变量对氟释放的影响时,发现变量氟化物清漆(<0.001)和暴露时间(<0.001)对氟的释放有影响。
氟化物清漆的类型和应用后的时间对氟释放模型有影响。氟化物,局部用,氟化钠,饮料。