Bonner Kimberly E, Chyderiotis Sandra, Sicsic Jonathan, Mueller Judith E, Ulrich Angela K, Toomey Traci, Horvath Keith J, Neaton James D, Basta Nicole E
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Mar 14;22:101384. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101384. eCollection 2023 Jun.
Seasonal influenza vaccination rates remain low, and contribute to preventable influenza cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the US. While numerous interventions have been implemented to increase vaccine uptake, there is a need to determine which interventions contribute most to vaccine willingness, particularly among age groups with vaccination rates that have plateaued at suboptimal levels. This study aimed to quantify the relative effect of multiple interventions on vaccine willingness to receive influenza vaccine in three age groups using a series of hypothetical situations with different behavioral interventions. We assessed the relative impact of four categories of interventions: source of vaccine messages, type of vaccination messages, vaccination incentives, and ease of vaccine access using a discrete choice experiment. Within each category, we investigated the role of four different attributes to measure their relative contribution to willingness to be vaccinated by removing one option from each of the intervention categories. Among the 1,763 Minnesota residents who volunteered for our study, participants expressed vaccine willingness in over 80% of the scenarios presented. Easy access to drop-in vaccination sites had the greatest impact on vaccine willingness in all age groups. Among the younger age group, small financial incentives also contributed to high vaccine willingness. Our results suggest that public health programs and vaccination campaigns may improve their chances of successfully increasing vaccine willingness if they offer interventions preferred by adults, including facilitating convenient access to vaccination and offering small monetary incentives, particularly for young adults.
季节性流感疫苗接种率仍然很低,在美国导致了可预防的流感病例、住院和死亡。虽然已经实施了许多干预措施来提高疫苗接种率,但仍有必要确定哪些干预措施对疫苗接种意愿的影响最大,特别是在接种率处于次优水平且停滞不前的年龄组中。本研究旨在通过一系列具有不同行为干预措施的假设情景,量化多种干预措施对三个年龄组接受流感疫苗接种意愿的相对影响。我们使用离散选择实验评估了四类干预措施的相对影响:疫苗信息来源、接种信息类型、接种激励措施以及疫苗获取的便利性。在每个类别中,我们通过从每个干预类别中去除一个选项来研究四个不同属性的作用,以衡量它们对接种意愿的相对贡献。在自愿参与我们研究的1763名明尼苏达州居民中,参与者在超过80%的呈现情景中表达了接种意愿。便捷的临时接种点对接种意愿在所有年龄组中影响最大。在较年轻的年龄组中,小额经济激励措施也有助于提高接种意愿。我们的结果表明,如果公共卫生项目和疫苗接种活动提供成年人偏好的干预措施,包括促进便捷的疫苗接种途径和提供小额金钱激励,特别是对年轻人,那么它们成功提高疫苗接种意愿的可能性可能会增加。