Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006237.
BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy (VH) and the global decline of vaccine coverage are a major global health threat, and novel approaches for increasing vaccine confidence and uptake are urgently needed. 'Nudging', defined as altering the environmental context in which a decision is made or a certain behaviour is enacted, has shown promising results in several health promotion strategies. We present a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding the value and impact of nudges to address VH. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to determine if nudging can mitigate VH and improve vaccine uptake. Our search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non-MeSH terms to identify articles related to nudging and vaccination in nine research databases. 15 177 titles were extracted and assessed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The final list of included articles was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. FINDINGS: Identified interventions are presented according to a framework for behaviour change, MINDSPACE. Articles (n=48) from 10 primarily high-income countries were included in the review. Nudging-based interventions identified include using reminders and recall, changing the way information is framed and delivered to an intended audience, changing the messenger delivering information, invoking social norms and emotional affect (eg, through storytelling, dramatic narratives and graphical presentations), and offering incentives or changing defaults. The most promising evidence exists for nudges that offer incentives to parents and healthcare workers, that make information more salient or that use trusted messengers to deliver information. The effectiveness of nudging interventions and the direction of the effect varies substantially by context. Evidence for some approaches is mixed, highlighting a need for further research, including how successful interventions can be adapted across settings. CONCLUSION: Nudging-based interventions show potential to increase vaccine confidence and uptake, but further evidence is needed for the development of clear recommendations. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic increases the urgency of undertaking nudging-focused research. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020185817.
背景:疫苗犹豫(VH)和疫苗接种覆盖率的全球下降是一个主要的全球健康威胁,迫切需要新的方法来提高疫苗信心和接种率。“推动”被定义为改变决策或实施特定行为的环境背景,在多项健康促进策略中已显示出良好的效果。我们综合了有关推动疫苗接种以解决 VH 的价值和影响的证据。
方法:我们进行了系统综述,以确定推动是否可以减轻 VH 并提高疫苗接种率。我们的搜索策略使用了医学主题词(MeSH)和非 MeSH 术语来确定九个研究数据库中与推动和疫苗接种相关的文章。提取并评估了 15177 个标题,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目的指南。使用混合方法评估工具和推荐评估、制定和评估框架评估纳入文章的最终列表。
结果:根据行为改变的 MINDSPACE 框架介绍了确定的干预措施。综述包括来自 10 个主要高收入国家的 48 篇文章。确定的基于推动的干预措施包括使用提醒和召回、改变向目标受众提供信息的方式和框架、改变提供信息的信息传递者、调用社会规范和情感影响(例如,通过讲故事、戏剧性叙述和图形演示)以及提供激励措施或更改默认设置。为父母和卫生保健工作者提供激励措施、使信息更突出或使用值得信赖的信息传递者提供信息的推动干预措施的证据最有希望。推动干预措施的效果和效果的方向因背景而异而有很大差异。一些方法的证据好坏参半,这突出表明需要进一步研究,包括如何在不同环境中适应成功的干预措施。
结论:基于推动的干预措施显示出增加疫苗信心和接种率的潜力,但需要进一步的证据来制定明确的建议。正在进行的 COVID-19 大流行增加了进行以推动为重点的研究的紧迫性。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020185817。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021-9
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021-6-2
Vaccine. 2015-8-14
Early Hum Dev. 2020-11
Eur J Public Health. 2017-10-1
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025-9
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025-3-19
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021-6-10
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021-5-18
Nat Med. 2021-4
Pediatr Int. 2021-11
BMC Public Health. 2021-1-9
Prev Med Rep. 2020-9-22