• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对在全科医疗中实施和使用人工智能的数据共享的看法——一项定性研究。

Patient perspectives on data sharing regarding implementing and using artificial intelligence in general practice - a qualitative study.

机构信息

Center for general practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09324-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09324-8
PMID:37016412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10071604/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to more elderly and patients with complex illnesses, there is an increasing pressure on the healthcare system. General practice especially feels this pressure as being the first point of contact for the patients. Developments in digitalization have undergone fast progress and data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential for use in general practice. To develop AI as a support tool for general practitioners (GPs), access to patients' health data is needed, but patients have concerns regarding data sharing. Furthermore, studies show that trust is important regarding the patient-GP relationship, data sharing, and AI. The aim of this paper is to uncover patient perspectives on trust regarding the patient-GP relationship, data sharing and AI in general practice.

METHOD

This study investigated 10 patients' perspectives through qualitative interviews and written vignettes were chosen to elicit the patients (interviewees) perspectives on topics that they were not familiar with prior to the interviews. The study specifically investigated perspectives on 1) The patient-GP relationship, 2) data sharing regarding developing AI for general practice, and 3) implementation and use of AI in general practice using thematic analysis. The study took place in the North Denmark Region and the interviewees included had to be registered in general practice and be above 18 years in age. We included four men between 25 to 74 years in age and six women between 27 to 46 years in age.

RESULTS

The interviewees expressed a high level of trust towards their GP and were willing to share their health data with their GP. The interviewees believed that AI could be a great help to GPs if used as a support tool in general practice. However, it was important for the interviewees that the GP would still be the primary decision maker.

CONCLUSION

Patients may be willing to share health data to help implement and use AI in general practice. If AI is implemented in a way that preserves the patient-GP relationship and used as a support tool for the GP, our results indicate that patients may be positive towards the use of AI in general practice.

摘要

背景

由于老年人和患有复杂疾病的患者增多,医疗保健系统的压力越来越大。全科医学尤其感受到了这种压力,因为它是患者的第一接触点。数字化发展迅速,数据驱动的人工智能(AI)在全科医学中显示出巨大的应用潜力。要将 AI 开发为全科医生(GP)的支持工具,需要访问患者的健康数据,但患者对数据共享存在担忧。此外,研究表明,信任对于医患关系、数据共享和 AI 非常重要。本文旨在揭示患者对信任的看法,包括医患关系、数据共享和 AI 在全科医学中的应用。

方法

本研究通过定性访谈调查了 10 名患者的观点,并选择书面情景介绍来引出患者(受访者)对他们在访谈前不熟悉的主题的观点。本研究特别调查了以下三个主题的观点:1)医患关系;2)开发用于全科医学的 AI 数据共享;3)在全科医学中实施和使用 AI,采用主题分析。该研究在丹麦北部地区进行,受访者必须在全科医学中注册,年龄在 18 岁以上。我们包括了 4 名年龄在 25 至 74 岁之间的男性和 6 名年龄在 27 至 46 岁之间的女性。

结果

受访者对他们的 GP 表示高度信任,并愿意与他们的 GP 分享他们的健康数据。受访者认为,如果将 AI 用作全科医学的支持工具,它可以成为 GP 的一大帮助。然而,对受访者来说,GP 仍然是主要的决策者是很重要的。

结论

患者可能愿意分享健康数据,以帮助在全科医学中实施和使用 AI。如果 AI 以一种保护医患关系的方式实施,并用作 GP 的支持工具,我们的研究结果表明,患者可能对在全科医学中使用 AI持积极态度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bd/10071604/23b8955fd309/12913_2023_9324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bd/10071604/23b8955fd309/12913_2023_9324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72bd/10071604/23b8955fd309/12913_2023_9324_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient perspectives on data sharing regarding implementing and using artificial intelligence in general practice - a qualitative study.患者对在全科医疗中实施和使用人工智能的数据共享的看法——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09324-8.
2
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
3
Requirements for implementing online information material for patients with low back pain in general practice: an interview study.在全科医疗中为腰痛患者实施在线信息材料的要求:一项访谈研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Mar;37(1):60-68. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1569413. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
4
General Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Systems: Interview Study.全科医生对人工智能系统的态度:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e28916. doi: 10.2196/28916.
5
Burdened parents sharing their concerns for their children with the doctor. .父母忧心忡忡,向医生诉说对孩子的担忧。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Sep;37(3):327-334. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1639907. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Where the joy comes from: a qualitative exploration of deep GP-patient relationships.快乐从何而来:深入探讨全科医生与患者的关系。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02224-0.
7
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
8
Exploring Physician Perspectives on Using Real-world Care Data for the Development of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies in Health Care: Qualitative Study.探索医生对利用真实世界医疗数据开发医疗保健领域人工智能技术的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 18;6(5):e35367. doi: 10.2196/35367.
9
The existential dimension in general practice: identifying understandings and experiences of general practitioners in Denmark.全科医疗中的存在维度:识别丹麦全科医生的理解与经验
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):385-393. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249064. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
10
General practitioner trainees' career perspectives after COVID-19: a qualitative study in China.新冠疫情后全科住院医师培训学员的职业展望:中国的一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01364-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in medicine: Current applications in cardiology, oncology, and radiology.医学中的人工智能:当前在心脏病学、肿瘤学和放射学中的应用。
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):106854. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106854.
2
AI and Primary Care: Scoping Review.人工智能与初级保健:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 15;27:e65950. doi: 10.2196/65950.
3
Dr AI will see you now: could artificial intelligence replace general practitioners?现在人工智能医生来为您看病了:人工智能能取代全科医生吗?

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical decisions using AI must consider patient values.临床决策使用人工智能必须考虑患者的价值观。
Nat Med. 2022 Feb;28(2):229-232. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01624-y.
2
Public patient views of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A nominal group technique study.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的患者看法:一项名义小组技术研究。
Digit Health. 2021 Dec 15;7:20552076211063682. doi: 10.1177/20552076211063682. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
A Vision of Future Healthcare: Potential Opportunities and Risks of Systems Medicine from a Citizen and Patient Perspective-Results of a Qualitative Study.
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-04006-2.
4
Perceptions of, Barriers to, and Facilitators of the Use of AI in Primary Care: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.基层医疗中人工智能应用的认知、障碍与促进因素:定性研究的系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 25;27:e71186. doi: 10.2196/71186.
5
Indecision on the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare-A qualitative study of patient perspectives on trust, responsibility and self-determination using AI-CDSS.医疗保健领域人工智能应用的决策困境——一项关于患者对使用人工智能临床决策支持系统的信任、责任和自主决定权观点的定性研究
Digit Health. 2025 May 30;11:20552076251339522. doi: 10.1177/20552076251339522. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Situating governance and regulatory concerns for generative artificial intelligence and large language models in medical education.将生成式人工智能和大语言模型在医学教育中的治理与监管问题置于适当位置。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 27;8(1):315. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01721-z.
7
Attitudes Toward AI Usage in Patient Health Care: Evidence From a Population Survey Vignette Experiment.对人工智能在患者医疗保健中应用的态度:来自一项人口调查情景实验的证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e70179. doi: 10.2196/70179.
8
Exploring Patient Participation in AI-Supported Health Care: Qualitative Study.探索患者在人工智能支持的医疗保健中的参与度:定性研究。
JMIR AI. 2025 May 5;4:e50781. doi: 10.2196/50781.
9
A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities.审视人工智能与医疗保健差距
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Mar 6;8:1545869. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1545869. eCollection 2025.
10
The Perceptions of Potential Prerequisites for Artificial Intelligence in Danish General Practice: Vignette-Based Interview Study Among General Practitioners.丹麦全科医疗中对人工智能潜在先决条件的认知:全科医生基于 vignette 的访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Mar 12;13:e63895. doi: 10.2196/63895.
未来医疗愿景:从公民和患者角度看系统医学的潜在机遇和风险——定性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 19;18(18):9879. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189879.
4
Why does continuity of care with family doctors matter? Review and qualitative synthesis of patient and physician perspectives.家庭医生连续性照护为何重要?患者和医生观点的回顾与定性综合。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Sep;67(9):679-688. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6709679.
5
Opening a "Can of Worms" to Explore the Public's Hopes and Fears About Health Care Data Sharing: Qualitative Study.打开“潘多拉之盒”,探索公众对医疗保健数据共享的希望和担忧:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 22;23(2):e22744. doi: 10.2196/22744.
6
Medication adherence in the older adults with chronic multimorbidity: a systematic review of qualitative studies on patient's experience.慢性多种疾病老年患者的药物依从性:关于患者体验的定性研究的系统评价
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Jun;11(3):369-381. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00313-2. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.研究参与者对定性数据共享的看法。
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Mar;42(2):13-27. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500044.
8
Patient Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Study.患者对人工智能用于皮肤癌筛查的看法:一项定性研究。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 May 1;156(5):501-512. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.5014.
9
The Ethics of Medical AI and the Physician-Patient Relationship.医疗 AI 的伦理与医患关系
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Jan;29(1):115-121. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000847.
10
Patients' and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence.患者和公众对健康数据用于研究的看法和态度:实证证据的叙述性综述。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):3-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105651. Epub 2019 Nov 12.