Jastreboff Pawel J, Jastreboff Margaret M
Department Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jastreboff Hearing Disorders Foundation (JHDF), Inc., Ellicott City, MD, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Mar 23;17:895574. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.895574. eCollection 2023.
Clinical observations of hundreds of patients who exhibited decreased tolerance to sound showed that many of them could not be diagnosed as having hyperacusis when negative reactions to a sound depend only on its physical characteristics. In the majority of these patients, the physical characteristics of bothersome sounds were secondary, and patients were able to tolerate other sounds with levels higher than sounds bothersome for them. The dominant feature determining the presence and strength of negative reactions are specific to a given patient's patterns and meaning of bothersome sounds. Moreover, negative reactions frequently depend on the situation in which the offensive sound is presented or by whom it is produced. Importantly, physiological and emotional reactions to bothersome sounds are very similar (even identical) for both hyperacusis and misophonia, so reactions cannot be used to diagnose and differentiate them. To label this non-reported phenomenon, we coined the term misophonia in 2001. Incorporating clinical observations into the framework of knowledge of brain functions allowed us to propose a neurophysiological model for misophonia. The observation that the physical characterization of misophonic trigger was secondary and frequently irrelevant suggested that the auditory pathways are working in identical manner in people with as in without misophonia. Descriptions of negative reactions indicated that the limbic and sympathetic parts of the autonomic nervous systems are involved but without manifestations of general malfunction of these systems. Patients with misophonia could not control internal emotional reactions (even when fully realizing that these reactions are disproportionate to benign sounds evoking them) suggesting that subconscious, conditioned reflexes linking the auditory system with other systems in the brain are the core mechanisms of misophonia. Consequently, the strength of functional connections between various systems in the brain plays a dominant role in misophonia, and the functional properties of the individual systems may be perfectly within the norms. Based on the postulated model, we proposed a treatment for misophonia, focused on the extinction of conditioned reflexes linking the auditory system with other systems in the brain. Treatment consists of specific counseling and sound therapy. It has been used for over 20 years with a published success rate of 83%.
对数百名声音耐受性下降患者的临床观察表明,当对声音的负面反应仅取决于其物理特征时,其中许多患者无法被诊断为患有恐音症。在这些患者中,大多数情况下,烦人的声音的物理特征是次要的,患者能够耐受比令他们烦恼的声音强度更高的其他声音。决定负面反应的存在和强度的主要特征特定于特定患者对烦人的声音的模式和意义。此外,负面反应通常取决于冒犯性声音出现的情境或由谁发出。重要的是,对烦人的声音的生理和情绪反应在恐音症和恐音症(厌恶之声症)中非常相似(甚至相同),因此这些反应不能用于诊断和区分它们。为了标记这种未被报道的现象,我们在2001年创造了“恐音症”这个术语。将临床观察纳入脑功能知识框架使我们能够提出一种恐音症的神经生理模型。对恐音触发因素的物理特征是次要的且常常无关紧要的观察表明,听觉通路在有恐音症和没有恐音症的人身上的工作方式相同。对负面反应的描述表明,自主神经系统的边缘和交感部分参与其中,但这些系统没有普遍功能障碍的表现。恐音症患者无法控制内心的情绪反应(即使完全意识到这些反应与引发它们的良性声音不成比例),这表明将听觉系统与大脑中的其他系统联系起来的潜意识条件反射是恐音症的核心机制。因此,大脑中各个系统之间功能连接的强度在恐音症中起主导作用,而各个系统的功能特性可能完全在正常范围内。基于所假设的模型,我们提出了一种针对恐音症的治疗方法,重点是消除将听觉系统与大脑中的其他系统联系起来的条件反射。治疗包括特定的咨询和声音疗法。它已经使用了20多年,公布的成功率为83%。