Burls Natalie, Sagoo Navjit
Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies George Mason University VA Fairfax USA.
Department of Meteorology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.
J Adv Model Earth Syst. 2022 Dec;14(12):e2022MS003389. doi: 10.1029/2022MS003389. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
Climate models are becoming increasingly sophisticated as climate scientists continually work to improve the realism with which the processes influencing Earth's climate are represented. One example is the treatment of cloud microphysics: as complexity is added to cloud microphysical schemes, Earth's energy budget can respond to changes in climate forcings, such as carbon dioxide or aerosols, in new ways. This increase in degrees of freedom has illuminated larger spread in climate sensitivity across the latest generation of climate models participating Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6, with more high climate sensitivity models (Zelinka et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085782). Whilst the historical record gives us just over a century of data to apply toward climate sensitivity constraints (e.g., Nijsse et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-737-2020), the ocean is still taking up much of the heat trapped by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and the climate system is far from equilibrium which limits our understanding how climate sensitivity might change in response to long-term forced climate change. Here we discuss the valuable tests that paleoclimate reconstructions can provide the latest generation of climate models, as demonstrated by the recent study of Zhu et al., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002776. Their study provides an example of the benefits for climate model development when climate models are confronted with simulating climates very different from today. Ideally the climate model development stage under future iterations of CMIP will involve such tests as an effort to constrain global climate sensitivity and the regional patterns of climate, such as polar amplification and subtropical aridification.
随着气候科学家不断努力提高对影响地球气候过程的表征真实性,气候模型正变得越来越复杂。一个例子是云微物理学的处理:随着云微物理方案增加复杂性,地球的能量平衡可能以新的方式对气候强迫(如二氧化碳或气溶胶)的变化做出响应。自由度的增加揭示了参与第六阶段耦合模式比较计划的最新一代气候模型在气候敏感性方面的更大差异,出现了更多高气候敏感性模型(泽林卡等人,2020年,https://doi.org/10.1029/2019gl085782)。虽然历史记录仅为我们提供了一个多世纪的数据用于气候敏感性约束(例如,尼伊斯等人,2020年,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-737-2020),但海洋仍在吸收大量由人为温室气体排放捕获的热量,气候系统远未达到平衡,这限制了我们对气候敏感性如何响应长期强迫气候变化而变化的理解。在此,我们讨论古气候重建可以为最新一代气候模型提供的有价值测试,正如朱等人2022年的最新研究所证明的那样(https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ms002776)。他们的研究提供了一个例子,说明当气候模型面临模拟与当今截然不同的气候时,对气候模型发展的益处。理想情况下,CMIP未来迭代中的气候模型开发阶段将涉及此类测试,作为约束全球气候敏感性和气候区域模式(如极地放大和亚热带干旱化)的一种努力。