Meehl Gerald A, Senior Catherine A, Eyring Veronika, Flato Gregory, Lamarque Jean-Francois, Stouffer Ronald J, Taylor Karl E, Schlund Manuel
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 24;6(26):eaba1981. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1981. eCollection 2020 Jun.
For the current generation of earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), the range of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, a hypothetical value of global warming at equilibrium for a doubling of CO) is 1.8°C to 5.6°C, the largest of any generation of models dating to the 1990s. Meanwhile, the range of transient climate response (TCR, the surface temperature warming around the time of CO doubling in a 1% per year CO increase simulation) for the CMIP6 models of 1.7°C (1.3°C to 3.0°C) is only slightly larger than for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Here we review and synthesize the latest developments in ECS and TCR values in CMIP, compile possible reasons for the current values as supplied by the modeling groups, and highlight future directions. Cloud feedbacks and cloud-aerosol interactions are the most likely contributors to the high values and increased range of ECS in CMIP6.
对于参与第六阶段耦合模式比较计划(CMIP6)的当代地球系统模型而言,平衡气候敏感度(ECS,即二氧化碳浓度翻倍达到平衡时全球变暖的假设值)范围为1.8°C至5.6°C,这是自20世纪90年代以来所有模型代次中范围最大的。与此同时,CMIP6模型的瞬态气候响应(TCR,即在每年1%的二氧化碳增加模拟中二氧化碳浓度翻倍时的地表温度变暖)范围为1.7°C(1.3°C至3.0°C),仅略大于CMIP3和CMIP5模型。在此,我们回顾并综合了CMIP中ECS和TCR值的最新进展,汇总了建模团队给出的当前数值的可能原因,并突出了未来的发展方向。云反馈和云 - 气溶胶相互作用最有可能是导致CMIP6中ECS值偏高和范围扩大的原因。