• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量评估可以在不完全信息下稳定间接互惠。

Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information.

机构信息

KAIST Graduate School of AI, 02455, Seoul, South Korea.

Booth School of Business, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 12;14(1):2086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x
PMID:37045828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097696/
Abstract

The field of indirect reciprocity investigates how social norms can foster cooperation when individuals continuously monitor and assess each other's social interactions. By adhering to certain social norms, cooperating individuals can improve their reputation and, in turn, receive benefits from others. Eight social norms, known as the "leading eight," have been shown to effectively promote the evolution of cooperation as long as information is public and reliable. These norms categorize group members as either 'good' or 'bad'. In this study, we examine a scenario where individuals instead assign nuanced reputation scores to each other, and only cooperate with those whose reputation exceeds a certain threshold. We find both analytically and through simulations that such quantitative assessments are error-correcting, thus facilitating cooperation in situations where information is private and unreliable. Moreover, our results identify four specific norms that are robust to such conditions, and may be relevant for helping to sustain cooperation in natural populations.

摘要

间接互惠领域研究了在个体不断监控和评估彼此社会互动的情况下,社会规范如何促进合作。通过遵守某些社会规范,合作的个体可以提高自己的声誉,并反过来从他人那里获得好处。八项社会规范,被称为“八大规范”,只要信息是公开和可靠的,就可以有效地促进合作的进化。这些规范将群体成员分为“好”或“坏”两类。在这项研究中,我们考察了一种个体彼此分配微妙的声誉分数的情况,并且只与那些声誉超过一定阈值的人合作。我们通过分析和模拟发现,这种定量评估是纠错的,因此在信息是私人和不可靠的情况下促进了合作。此外,我们的结果确定了四种在这种情况下稳健的特定规范,这可能有助于维持自然种群中的合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/bdff8918ebaa/41467_2023_37817_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/40e4f24c7e01/41467_2023_37817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/6c0123482381/41467_2023_37817_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/215803b6f559/41467_2023_37817_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/cea29e48dd67/41467_2023_37817_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/0afd15d0228d/41467_2023_37817_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/fd9e3f4cbcf5/41467_2023_37817_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/51a0ee9277c1/41467_2023_37817_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/cbf5da6f7aec/41467_2023_37817_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/bdff8918ebaa/41467_2023_37817_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/40e4f24c7e01/41467_2023_37817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/6c0123482381/41467_2023_37817_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/215803b6f559/41467_2023_37817_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/cea29e48dd67/41467_2023_37817_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/0afd15d0228d/41467_2023_37817_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/fd9e3f4cbcf5/41467_2023_37817_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/51a0ee9277c1/41467_2023_37817_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/cbf5da6f7aec/41467_2023_37817_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3d0/10097696/bdff8918ebaa/41467_2023_37817_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative assessment can stabilize indirect reciprocity under imperfect information.定量评估可以在不完全信息下稳定间接互惠。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 12;14(1):2086. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37817-x.
2
Indirect reciprocity with stochastic and dual reputation updates.带有随机和双重声誉更新的间接互惠。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Jul 20;19(7):e1011271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011271. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Indirect reciprocity under incomplete observation.不完全观察下的间接互惠。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Jul;7(7):e1002113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002113. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
4
Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation.社会规范复杂性和过去声誉在合作进化中的作用。
Nature. 2018 Mar 7;555(7695):242-245. doi: 10.1038/nature25763.
5
The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.排名前八位的:能够通过间接互惠维持合作的社会规范。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Apr 21;239(4):435-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
6
The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.间接互惠下人类合作的复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200291. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0291. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Evolutionary stability of cooperation in indirect reciprocity under noisy and private assessment.在存在噪声和私人评估的情况下,间接互惠合作的进化稳定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2300544120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300544120. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Evolution of norms for judging social behavior.评判社会行为规范的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2219480120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219480120. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
The evolution of indirect reciprocity under action and assessment generosity.行为和评估慷慨度下间接互惠的演变。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96932-1.
10
Social Norms of Cooperation in Small-Scale Societies.小规模社会中的合作社会规范。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 25;12(1):e1004709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004709. eCollection 2016 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Picking strategies in games of cooperation.合作博弈中的选择策略。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2319925121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319925121. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Indirect reciprocity in the public goods game with collective reputations.具有集体声誉的公共物品博弈中的间接互惠。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Apr;22(225):20240827. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0827. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Indirect reciprocity under opinion synchronization.意见同步下的间接互惠。

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of indirect reciprocity under action and assessment generosity.行为和评估慷慨度下间接互惠的演变。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96932-1.
2
Local stability of cooperation in a continuous model of indirect reciprocity.间接互惠连续模型中的合作局部稳定性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 9;11(1):14225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93598-7.
3
Adherence to public institutions that foster cooperation.坚持促进合作的公共机构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2418364121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418364121. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
'Look twice and forgive once' when judging social behaviour.评判社会行为时,“多看两眼,原谅一次”。
Nature. 2024 Oct 23. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-03389-z.
5
The evolution of private reputations in information-abundant landscapes.信息丰富环境中私人声誉的演变。
Nature. 2024 Oct;634(8035):883-889. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07977-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Computational evolution of social norms in well-mixed and group-structured populations.混合群体和群体结构人群中社会规范的计算进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2406885121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406885121. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
7
A mechanistic model of gossip, reputations, and cooperation.谣言、声誉和合作的机械模型。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 14;121(20):e2400689121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400689121. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
Imitation dynamics on networks with incomplete information.具有不完全信息的网络上的模仿动态
Nat Commun. 2023 Nov 17;14(1):7453. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43048-x.
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 11;12(1):3567. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23783-9.
4
A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity.直接互惠和间接互惠的统一框架。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1292-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01114-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Indirect reciprocity with simple records.有简单记录的间接互惠。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 26;117(21):11344-11349. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921984117. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
Partners and rivals in direct reciprocity.直接互惠的伙伴和对手。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):469-477. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0320-9. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
7
Evolution of empathetic moral evaluation.同理心道德评价的演变。
Elife. 2019 Apr 9;8:e44269. doi: 10.7554/eLife.44269.
8
Indirect reciprocity with private, noisy, and incomplete information.具有私人信息、嘈杂信息和不完全信息的间接互惠。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):12241-12246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810565115. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
9
Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation.基于声誉的合作中选择性忽视的实验证据。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 4;8(1):14813. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33147-x.
10
Social norm complexity and past reputations in the evolution of cooperation.社会规范复杂性和过去声誉在合作进化中的作用。
Nature. 2018 Mar 7;555(7695):242-245. doi: 10.1038/nature25763.