Lupidi Marco, Mangoni Lorenzo, Centini Chiara, Pompucci Gregorio, Lanzafame Luca, Danieli Luca, Fruttini Daniela, Peiretti Enrico, Chhablani Jay, Mariotti Cesare
Eye Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Fondazione per la Macula Onlus, Di.N.O.G.Mi., University Eye Clinic, 16132 Genova, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 1;12(7):2637. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072637.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative differences between 20 and 85 kHz A-scan rate optical coherence tomography (OCT) images acquired by spectral domain OCT. The study included 60 healthy subjects analyzed with horizontal linear scans with a variable A-scan rate (SHIFT technology, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). The retinal thickness measurement of each retinal layer was performed in three different positions (subfoveal, nasal, and temporal). The qualitative assessment was performed by two independent observers who rated every image with a score ranging from 1 ("sufficient") to 3 ("excellent") on the basis of three parameters: visualization of the vitreo-retinal interface, characterization of the retinal layers, and visualization of the sclero-choroidal interface. No statistically significant differences in terms of retinal layer thickness between the two A-scan rate scans were observed ( > 0.05). The coefficient of variation of the retinal thickness values was lower in the 20 kHz group (25.8% versus 30.1% with the 85 kHz). The 20 kHz images showed a higher quality index for both observers. An inner plexiform layer (IPL) multilaminarity was detected in 78.3% of patients from the 20 kHz group and in 40% of patients from the 85 kHz group ( < 0.05).
本研究的目的是评估通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)获取的20kHz和85kHz A扫描速率光学相干断层扫描图像之间的定性和定量差异。该研究纳入了60名健康受试者,采用可变A扫描速率的水平线性扫描进行分析(SHIFT技术,德国海德堡海德堡工程公司)。在三个不同位置(黄斑中心凹下、鼻侧和颞侧)对每个视网膜层进行视网膜厚度测量。定性评估由两名独立观察者进行,他们根据三个参数对每张图像进行评分,评分范围为1(“足够”)至3(“优秀”):玻璃体视网膜界面的可视化、视网膜层的特征以及巩膜脉络膜界面的可视化。在两次A扫描速率扫描之间,未观察到视网膜层厚度方面的统计学显著差异(>0.05)。20kHz组视网膜厚度值的变异系数较低(25.8%,而85kHz组为30.1%)。对于两位观察者而言,20kHz图像均显示出更高的质量指数。在20kHz组78.3%的患者中检测到内网状层(IPL)多层结构,而在85kHz组40%的患者中检测到(<0.05)。