Dudek F E, Snow R W, Taylor C P
Adv Neurol. 1986;44:593-617.
Four general mechanisms can hypothetically contribute to or mediate localized synchronization of neuronal activity: (a) recurrent excitatory chemical synapses, (b) electrotonic coupling via gap junctions, (c) electrical field effects (ephaptic interactions), and (d) changes in the concentration of extracellular ions (e.g., K+). It has generally been believed that synchronization of epileptiform bursts derives primarily, if not exclusively, from recurrent excitatory chemical synapses. Dual intracellular recordings from the CA3 area of the hippocampus have been used to demonstrate the existence of recurrent synaptic excitation, and computer simulations have provided a theoretical framework for the idea that relatively sparse interactions through recurrent excitatory chemical synapses can generate synchronized bursting after inhibitory pathways are blocked with convulsant agents. Additional experimental studies have supported the hypothesis that a model for seizure discharge, the penicillin-induced paroxysmal depolarization shift (PDS), is associated with a large increase in excitatory synaptic conductance. However, recent studies have suggested that electrical interactions are also likely to play an important role in spike synchronization during epileptic discharges. Several research groups have used in vitro preparations to show that afterdischarges and spontaneous bursts of population spikes (which represent synchronized action potentials) can occur after chemical synaptic transmission has been blocked in solutions containing low [Ca2+]. Although this result was first observed in the CA1 area, it has recently been confirmed in other regions of the hippocampus. These experiments indicate that mechanisms other than chemical synaptic transmission are capable of synchronizing action potentials in the hippocampus. In this chapter, two forms of electrical interaction that could mediate synchronization will be considered: (a) electrotonic coupling through gap junctions and (b) electrical field effects through extracellular space. Changes in the concentration of extracellular ions are another mechanism not involving chemical synapses. However, it seems unlikely that ionic changes act on the rapid time scale of electrical interactions, and their contribution is discussed elsewhere in this volume. We review evidence for the existence of electrotonic coupling and electrical field effects in the hippocampus and neocortex, and discuss their possible involvement in the synchronization of epileptiform events.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
理论上,有四种一般机制可导致或介导神经元活动的局部同步:(a) 反复性兴奋性化学突触;(b) 通过缝隙连接的电紧张耦合;(c) 电场效应(电突触相互作用);以及 (d) 细胞外离子浓度的变化(例如K+)。一般认为,癫痫样爆发的同步主要(如果不是唯一)源于反复性兴奋性化学突触。来自海马体CA3区的双细胞内记录已被用于证明反复性突触兴奋的存在,并且计算机模拟为这样一种观点提供了理论框架,即通过反复性兴奋性化学突触进行的相对稀疏的相互作用在抑制性通路被惊厥剂阻断后可产生同步爆发。额外的实验研究支持了如下假设,即癫痫放电模型——青霉素诱导的阵发性去极化偏移(PDS)——与兴奋性突触电导的大幅增加有关。然而,最近的研究表明,电相互作用在癫痫放电期间的尖峰同步中也可能发挥重要作用。几个研究小组使用体外制备物表明,在含有低[Ca2+]的溶液中化学突触传递被阻断后,可出现后放电和群体尖峰的自发爆发(代表同步动作电位)。尽管这一结果最初是在CA1区观察到的,但最近已在海马体的其他区域得到证实。这些实验表明,除化学突触传递外的其他机制能够使海马体中的动作电位同步。在本章中,将考虑两种可介导同步的电相互作用形式:(a) 通过缝隙连接的电紧张耦合;以及 (b) 通过细胞外空间的电场效应。细胞外离子浓度的变化是另一种不涉及化学突触的机制。然而,离子变化似乎不太可能在电相互作用的快速时间尺度上起作用,并且其作用在本卷的其他地方进行了讨论。我们回顾了海马体和新皮质中电紧张耦合和电场效应存在的证据,并讨论了它们可能参与癫痫样事件同步的情况。(摘要截选至400字)