van Luijtelaar E L, Coenen A M
Physiol Behav. 1986;36(4):603-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(86)90341-0.
Three different techniques were used to study the effects of 72 hr deprivation of paradoxical sleep on percentages total sleep, light slow wave sleep, deep slow wave sleep and paradoxical sleep during deprivation and recovery periods in rats. The paradoxical sleep deprivation methods used were the classical platform, the pendulum and the multiple platform techniques. The different groups were continuously recorded over a base-line day, three deprivation days and four recovery days. All three groups showed clear suppression of paradoxical sleep throughout the deprivation period, although small differences between the pendulum and the multiple platform technique emerged. The distribution of sleep across the day and the amount of deep slow wave sleep were affected differently. Besides an exception immediately after deprivation, no important differences were detected on the recovery days. The recovery is characterized by an immediate rebound of paradoxical sleep, completed within two days, as well as rapid re-normalization of sleep percentages. A small rebound of deep slow wave sleep was recorded at the end of the dark period during the first three recovery days. Various sleep and non-sleep related variables of the PS deprivation techniques are discussed. It is improbable that the platform-pendulum controversy is due to differences in the amount of PS deprivation or the other sleep parameters measured here. Rather it looks as though non-specific platform effects override the effects of PS deprivation.
采用三种不同技术，研究大鼠在剥夺期和恢复期72小时反常睡眠剥夺对总睡眠时间、浅慢波睡眠、深慢波睡眠及反常睡眠百分比的影响。所采用的反常睡眠剥夺方法为经典平台法、摆动法和多平台技术。不同组在基线日、三天剥夺期和四天恢复期进行连续记录。在整个剥夺期，所有三组的反常睡眠均受到明显抑制，不过摆动法和多平台技术之间出现了细微差异。全天睡眠分布和深慢波睡眠量受到的影响有所不同。除剥夺后立即出现的一个例外情况外，在恢复期未检测到重要差异。恢复的特征是反常睡眠立即反弹，在两天内完成，以及睡眠百分比迅速恢复正常。在头三个恢复期的黑暗期结束时，记录到深慢波睡眠有小幅反弹。讨论了反常睡眠剥夺技术的各种睡眠和非睡眠相关变量。平台 - 摆动争议不太可能是由于反常睡眠剥夺量或此处测量的其他睡眠参数的差异所致。相反，似乎非特异性平台效应超过了反常睡眠剥夺的效应。
