University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Green Science Policy Institute, Berkeley, California 94709, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 May 23;57(20):7645-7665. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c08244. Epub 2023 May 8.
Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), a large class of chemicals that includes high production volume substances, have been used for decades as antimicrobials, preservatives, and antistatic agents and for other functions in cleaning, disinfecting, personal care products, and durable consumer goods. QAC use has accelerated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the banning of 19 antimicrobials from several personal care products by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2016. Studies conducted before and after the onset of the pandemic indicate increased human exposure to QACs. Environmental releases of these chemicals have also increased. Emerging information on adverse environmental and human health impacts of QACs is motivating a reconsideration of the risks and benefits across the life cycle of their production, use, and disposal. This work presents a critical review of the literature and scientific perspective developed by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team of authors from academia, governmental, and nonprofit organizations. The review evaluates currently available information on the ecological and human health profile of QACs and identifies multiple areas of potential concern. Adverse ecological effects include acute and chronic toxicity to susceptible aquatic organisms, with concentrations of some QACs approaching levels of concern. Suspected or known adverse health outcomes include dermal and respiratory effects, developmental and reproductive toxicity, disruption of metabolic function such as lipid homeostasis, and impairment of mitochondrial function. QACs' role in antimicrobial resistance has also been demonstrated. In the US regulatory system, how a QAC is managed depends on how it is used, for example in pesticides or personal care products. This can result in the same QACs receiving different degrees of scrutiny depending on the use and the agency regulating it. Further, the US Environmental Protection Agency's current method of grouping QACs based on structure, first proposed in 1988, is insufficient to address the wide range of QAC chemistries, potential toxicities, and exposure scenarios. Consequently, exposures to common mixtures of QACs and from multiple sources remain largely unassessed. Some restrictions on the use of QACs have been implemented in the US and elsewhere, primarily focused on personal care products. Assessing the risks posed by QACs is hampered by their vast structural diversity and a lack of quantitative data on exposure and toxicity for the majority of these compounds. This review identifies important data gaps and provides research and policy recommendations for preserving the utility of QAC chemistries while also seeking to limit adverse environmental and human health effects.
季铵化合物(QACs)是一大类化学物质,其中包括高产量物质,几十年来一直被用作抗菌剂、防腐剂和抗静电剂,以及清洁、消毒、个人护理产品和耐用消费品中的其他功能。随着 COVID-19 大流行的爆发以及美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在 2016 年禁止 19 种抗菌剂用于几种个人护理产品,QAC 的使用有所增加。大流行之前和之后进行的研究表明,人类接触 QAC 的情况有所增加。这些化学物质的环境释放也有所增加。关于 QAC 对环境和人类健康的不良影响的新信息正在促使人们重新考虑其生产、使用和处置整个生命周期的风险和益处。本工作对来自学术界、政府和非营利组织的多学科、多机构作者团队的文献和科学观点进行了批判性审查。该审查评估了目前关于 QAC 生态和人类健康状况的可用信息,并确定了多个潜在关注领域。不良的生态影响包括对敏感水生生物的急性和慢性毒性,一些 QAC 的浓度接近令人关注的水平。可疑或已知的不良健康后果包括皮肤和呼吸道影响、发育和生殖毒性、代谢功能(如脂质稳态)的破坏以及线粒体功能的损害。QAC 在抗微生物耐药性中的作用也得到了证明。在美国监管系统中,QAC 的管理方式取决于其用途,例如在农药或个人护理产品中。这可能导致相同的 QAC 根据用途和监管机构的不同而受到不同程度的审查。此外,美国环境保护局(EPA)目前基于结构对 QAC 进行分组的方法(于 1988 年首次提出)不足以解决广泛的 QAC 化学、潜在毒性和暴露情况。因此,对常见 QAC 混合物的暴露以及来自多个来源的暴露在很大程度上仍未得到评估。美国和其他地方已经对 QAC 的使用实施了一些限制,主要集中在个人护理产品上。由于 QAC 具有广泛的结构多样性,以及大多数这些化合物的暴露和毒性的定量数据缺乏,因此评估 QAC 带来的风险受到阻碍。本审查确定了重要的数据差距,并为保留 QAC 化学物质的实用性提供了研究和政策建议,同时寻求限制对环境和人类健康的不良影响。