Pedersen Tim T, Andersen Mikael Skou, Victoria Marta, Andresen Gorm B
Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
ICLIMATE Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
iScience. 2023 Apr 18;26(5):106677. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106677. eCollection 2023 May 19.
Climate change mitigation is a global challenge that, however, needs to be resolved by national-level authorities, resembling a "tragedy of the commons". This paradox is reflected at the European scale, as climate commitments are made by the EU collectively, but implementation is the responsibility of individual Member States. Here, we investigate a suite of near-optimal effort-sharing scenarios where the European electricity sector is decarbonized between 55% and 75% relative to 1990, in line with 2030 ambitions. To this end, we use a brownfield electricity system optimization model in combination with the Modeling All Alternatives methodology. Results show that only very particular effort-sharing schemes are able to reach the theoretical minimum system cost. In most cases, an additional cost of at least 5% is incurred. Results reveal large inequalities in the efforts required to decarbonize national electricity sectors.
减缓气候变化是一项全球性挑战,然而,这需要由国家层面的当局来解决,这类似于一种“公地悲剧”。这种矛盾在欧洲层面得到体现,因为气候承诺是由欧盟集体做出的,但实施则是各个成员国的责任。在此,我们研究了一系列接近最优的努力分担情景,即欧洲电力部门相对于1990年实现55%至75%的脱碳,这符合2030年的目标。为此,我们将一个棕地电力系统优化模型与“建模所有替代方案”方法结合使用。结果表明,只有非常特殊的努力分担方案才能达到理论上的最低系统成本。在大多数情况下,会产生至少5%的额外成本。结果揭示了各国电力部门脱碳所需努力方面存在的巨大不平等。