Suppr超能文献

比较 ASTM E1174-21 医护人员洗手方法中描述的使用袋子和手套回收黏质沙雷氏菌的效果。

Comparative Recovery of Serratia marcescens Using Bags versus Gloves as Described in ASTM E1174-21 Health Care Personnel Handwash Method.

机构信息

Henkel Corporation, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0128823. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01288-23. Epub 2023 May 18.

Abstract

The ASTM E1174-21 Health Care Personnel Handwash method is prescribed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to demonstrate the efficacy of antiseptic handwashing products. The standardized method allows for marker bacteria to be collected from the hands by using either a bag or a glove. Two recent studies utilizing the different collection methods testing the same product showed substantial differences in results. We sponsored two independent studies to compare the bag and glove collection methods following contamination with Serratia marcescens. Overall, there was no difference between collection methods for bacteria recovered (0.603). The distribution of recovery for the bag method was slightly less variable than for the glove method. Statistical differences were observed within each lab based on the collection day. The day-to-day variability is critical to consider for future multiple-day studies. Additionally, hand size appears to impact recovery, especially for the glove method, with both small and medium hand sizes resulting in higher recovery than large and extralarge hand sizes (0.015), whereas hand size did not impact recovery with the bag method (0.315). While it appears that both the bag and glove methods can be used, our findings suggest that gloves may not be the best option for subjects with large to extra-large hands. Additional work looking at bacterial recovery following product treatment is warranted to understand the impact of large hands in the bag versus glove recovery method. Antiseptic hand wash products are evaluated using the standard ASTM E1174-21 to demonstrate their antibacterial efficacy. Often products are tested at multiple labs, and the need to understand variables that may play a role in the outcome of the study is important. This work allows us to evaluate the impact that the two collection methods, bags and gloves, have on bacteria recovery. If differences are observed, standardization to one method may be critical to ensure similar test results when planning studies at multiple labs.

摘要

ASTM E1174-21 医疗保健人员洗手方法由美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 规定,用于证明抗菌洗手产品的功效。该标准化方法允许使用袋子或手套从手上收集标记细菌。最近的两项研究使用不同的收集方法测试相同的产品,结果显示出实质性的差异。我们赞助了两项独立的研究,比较了在污染了粘质沙雷氏菌后使用袋子和手套收集方法。总体而言,两种收集方法对细菌回收率没有差异(0.603)。袋子法的回收率分布比手套法稍小。基于收集日,在每个实验室中观察到统计差异。未来进行多天研究时,必须考虑每日变化的可变性。此外,手的大小似乎会影响回收率,尤其是对于手套方法,小手和中手的回收率高于大手和特大手(0.015),而手的大小对手套法的回收率没有影响(0.315)。虽然似乎可以使用袋子和手套两种方法,但我们的研究结果表明,对于大手到特大手的受试者,手套可能不是最佳选择。需要进一步研究产品处理后细菌回收率,以了解大手在袋子与手套回收方法中的影响。抗菌洗手产品使用标准 ASTM E1174-21 进行评估,以证明其抗菌功效。通常在多个实验室测试产品,了解可能对研究结果产生影响的变量非常重要。这项工作使我们能够评估袋子和手套这两种收集方法对细菌回收率的影响。如果观察到差异,标准化为一种方法可能对于确保在多个实验室进行研究时获得相似的测试结果至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a611/10269534/28bc480c7f53/spectrum.01288-23-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验