• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多研究评估基于神经影像学的心境障碍药物分类预测。

Multi-study evaluation of neuroimaging-based prediction of medication class in mood disorders.

机构信息

Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA; School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Tri-Institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS) [Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University], Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023 Aug;333:111655. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111655. Epub 2023 May 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111655
PMID:37201216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330565/
Abstract

Clinicians often face a dilemma in diagnosing bipolar disorder patients with complex symptoms who spend more time in a depressive state than a manic state. The current gold standard for such diagnosis, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), is not objectively grounded in pathophysiology. In such complex cases, relying solely on the DSM may result in misdiagnosis as major depressive disorder (MDD). A biologically-based classification algorithm that can accurately predict treatment response may help patients suffering from mood disorders. Here we used an algorithm to do so using neuroimaging data. We used the neuromark framework to learn a kernel function for support vector machine (SVM) on multiple feature subspaces. The neuromark framework achieves up to 95.45% accuracy, 0.90 sensitivity, and 0.92 specificity in predicting antidepressant (AD) vs. mood stabilizer (MS) response in patients. We incorporated two additional datasets to evaluate the generalizability of our approach. The trained algorithm achieved up to 89% accuracy, 0.88 sensitivity, and 0.89 specificity in predicting the DSM-based diagnosis on these datasets. We also translated the model to distinguish responders to treatment from nonresponders with up to 70% accuracy. This approach reveals multiple salient biomarkers of medication-class of response within mood disorders.

摘要

临床医生在诊断复杂症状的双相情感障碍患者时常常面临两难境地,这些患者处于抑郁状态的时间比处于躁狂状态的时间长。目前,这种诊断的黄金标准,即《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM),在病理生理学上并没有客观依据。在这种复杂的情况下,仅仅依靠 DSM 可能会导致误诊为重度抑郁症(MDD)。一种基于生物学的分类算法,可以准确预测治疗反应,可能有助于患有情绪障碍的患者。在这里,我们使用神经影像学数据来使用算法做到这一点。我们使用神经标记框架在多个特征子空间上学习支持向量机(SVM)的核函数。神经标记框架在预测抗抑郁药(AD)与情绪稳定剂(MS)对患者的反应方面达到了高达 95.45%的准确率、0.90 的敏感性和 0.92 的特异性。我们还纳入了两个额外的数据集来评估我们方法的泛化能力。在这些数据集中,训练有素的算法在预测基于 DSM 的诊断方面达到了高达 89%的准确率、0.88 的敏感性和 0.89 的特异性。我们还将模型转换为能够以高达 70%的准确率区分治疗反应者和无反应者。这种方法揭示了情绪障碍中药物反应类别的多个显著生物标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/d401e55f069d/nihms-1901360-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/fd228757cb72/nihms-1901360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/14f47f79118b/nihms-1901360-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/d401e55f069d/nihms-1901360-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/fd228757cb72/nihms-1901360-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/14f47f79118b/nihms-1901360-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f10/10330565/d401e55f069d/nihms-1901360-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-study evaluation of neuroimaging-based prediction of medication class in mood disorders.多研究评估基于神经影像学的心境障碍药物分类预测。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2023 Aug;333:111655. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111655. Epub 2023 May 9.
2
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
3
[Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders].[双相情感障碍中的抗精神病药物]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95456-5.
4
Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication-class of response in complex patients.心境障碍诊断中的复杂性:功能磁共振成像连接网络预测复杂患者的药物反应类别。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Nov;138(5):472-482. doi: 10.1111/acps.12945. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
Identification of Predictors of Mood Disorder Misdiagnosis and Subsequent Help-Seeking Behavior in Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Gradient-Boosted Tree Machine Learning Approach.基于梯度提升决策树机器学习方法识别抑郁症状个体心境障碍误诊的预测因子及随后的求助行为。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:e50738. doi: 10.2196/50738.
6
Treatment recommendations for DSM-5-defined mixed features.针对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版定义的混合特征的治疗建议。
CNS Spectr. 2017 Apr;22(2):147-154. doi: 10.1017/S1092852916000432. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
The prevalence and illness characteristics of DSM-5-defined "mixed feature specifier" in adults with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: Results from the International Mood Disorders Collaborative Project.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版定义的“混合特征说明符”在重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍成人患者中的患病率及疾病特征:国际心境障碍协作项目的结果
J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
8
Self-medication of mood disorders with alcohol and drugs in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.《酒精及相关状况全国流行病学调查》中情绪障碍的酒精和药物自我药疗
J Affect Disord. 2009 Jun;115(3):367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
9
Ensemble Learning for Early-Response Prediction of Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder.基于集成学习的重度抑郁症抗抑郁治疗早期反应预测。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jul;52(1):161-171. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27029. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Effectiveness evaluation of mood disorder treatment algorithms in Brazilian public healthcare patients.巴西公共医疗患者情绪障碍治疗算法的有效性评估。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan-Mar;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2016-2147. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Temperament Traits in Bipolar Disorder: Neuroimaging Study.气质特质在双相情感障碍中的作用:神经影像学研究
Depress Anxiety. 2025 May 10;2025:5974860. doi: 10.1155/da/5974860. eCollection 2025.
2
Neuroimage Analysis Methods and Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Reliable Biomarkers and Accurate Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Achievements Made by Chinese Scholars Around the Past Decade.用于精神分裂症可靠生物标志物和准确诊断的神经影像分析方法与人工智能技术:中国学者在过去十年取得的成就
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 14;51(2):325-342. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae110.
3
Searching Reproducible Brain Features using NeuroMark: Templates for Different Age Populations and Imaging Modalities.

本文引用的文献

1
A Decentralized ComBat Algorithm and Applications to Functional Network Connectivity.一种去中心化的ComBat算法及其在功能网络连接性中的应用。
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 15;13:826734. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.826734. eCollection 2022.
2
Default-mode and fronto-parietal network connectivity during rest distinguishes asymptomatic patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.静息状态下默认模式和额顶叶网络连接可区分双相障碍和重性抑郁障碍的无症状患者。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 23;11(1):547. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01660-9.
3
Whole-Brain Functional Network Connectivity Abnormalities in Affective and Non-Affective Early Phase Psychosis.
使用NeuroMark搜索可重现的脑特征:针对不同年龄人群和成像模态的模板
Neuroimage. 2024 Apr 15;292:120617. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120617. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Identifiability in Functional Connectivity May Unintentionally Inflate Prediction Results.功能连接中的可识别性可能会无意中夸大预测结果。
ArXiv. 2023 Aug 2:arXiv:2308.01451v1.
情感性和非情感性早期精神病中的全脑功能网络连接异常
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 18;15:682110. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.682110. eCollection 2021.
4
Dynamic functional network reconfiguration underlying the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder.精神分裂症和自闭症谱系障碍病理生理学基础下的动态功能网络重连。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jan;42(1):80-94. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25205. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
NeuroMark: An automated and adaptive ICA based pipeline to identify reproducible fMRI markers of brain disorders.NeuroMark:一种基于自动和自适应 ICA 的流水线,用于识别可重复的 fMRI 脑疾病标志物。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102375. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Dynamic state with covarying brain activity-connectivity: On the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.动态状态与大脑活动连接变化:精神分裂症的病理生理学。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117385. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117385. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Resting state functional network switching rate is differently altered in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.双相障碍和重度抑郁症患者的静息态功能网络切换率存在差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 15;41(12):3295-3304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25017. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: 'Adaptive' networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression.组独立成分分析在精神分裂症生物标志物识别中的应用:通过空间约束独立成分分析的“适应性”网络比时空回归更能显示出对组间差异的敏感性。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101747. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
9
Altered resting-state cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity of striatum in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.双相障碍和重度抑郁症患者纹状体静息态脑血流和功能连接的改变。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 2;90:177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
10
Complexity in mood disorder diagnosis: fMRI connectivity networks predicted medication-class of response in complex patients.心境障碍诊断中的复杂性:功能磁共振成像连接网络预测复杂患者的药物反应类别。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Nov;138(5):472-482. doi: 10.1111/acps.12945. Epub 2018 Aug 6.