• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人对预先医疗照护计划的意见以及影响其观点的因素:系统评价。

Opinions of Older Individuals on Advance Care Planning and Factors Affecting Their Views: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Akdeniz, Antalya 07070, Turkey.

Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Turgut Ozal, Malatya 44210, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 10;20(10):5780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105780.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20105780
PMID:37239509
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218071/
Abstract

The objective of this systematic review is to present older individuals' views on the advance care planning (ACP) process and the factors affecting those opinions. The review contains search terms predetermined in the databases of CINAHL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Academic Search Ultimate, Web of Science, Master FILE, and TR Dizin over the last 10 years (1 January 2012-31 December 2021) in English and Turkish. The studies were included in the research using inclusion (sample age ≥ 50, focusing on individuals' opinions on ACP) and exclusion (articles whose samples consisted of individuals with a specific disease, non-research articles) criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was used to collate findings. The most striking results are the positive perspectives increasing in parallel with the individuals' level of knowledge and experience about ACP. Variables affecting their views are advanced age, marital status, socioeconomic status, perception of remaining life expectancy, self-perceived health, number and stage of chronic diseases, religion, and cultural characteristics. This study offers guidance on the application and dissemination of ACP, empowering the use of this practice given the perspectives of older adults on ACP and the factors that affect them that the data show.

摘要

本次系统评价的目的是呈现老年人对预先医疗照护计划(ACP)过程的看法,以及影响这些观点的因素。该研究在过去 10 年(2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)中,使用英文和土耳其文,在 CINAHL、MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Academic Search Ultimate、Web of Science、MasterFILE 和 TR Dizin 数据库中预先确定了检索词。研究使用纳入(样本年龄≥50 岁,重点关注个人对 ACP 的看法)和排除标准(样本由特定疾病患者组成、非研究性文章的文章)纳入研究。使用混合方法评估工具进行质量评估。使用叙述性综合方法整理研究结果。最引人注目的结果是,随着个人对 ACP 的了解和经验的增加,对 ACP 的积极看法也在增加。影响他们观点的变量包括年龄较大、婚姻状况、社会经济地位、对剩余预期寿命的感知、自我感知的健康状况、慢性疾病的数量和阶段、宗教和文化特征。本研究为 ACP 的应用和传播提供了指导,根据老年人对 ACP 的看法以及数据显示影响这些看法的因素,赋予了使用这种实践的权力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa70/10218071/680102a6c78e/ijerph-20-05780-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa70/10218071/680102a6c78e/ijerph-20-05780-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa70/10218071/680102a6c78e/ijerph-20-05780-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Opinions of Older Individuals on Advance Care Planning and Factors Affecting Their Views: A Systematic Review.老年人对预先医疗照护计划的意见以及影响其观点的因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 10;20(10):5780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105780.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions on Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review.预先护理计划干预对养老院居民的影响:一项系统评价
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
4
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
How does ethnicity affect presence of advance care planning in care records for individuals with advanced disease? A mixed-methods systematic review.种族如何影响晚期疾病患者护理记录中预先护理计划的存在?一项混合方法系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Apr 17;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01168-7.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
8
A Systematic Review of Non-Seriously Ill Community-Dwelling Asians' Views on Advance Care Planning.非病重的社区居住亚洲人对预先医疗指示看法的系统回顾。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023 Dec;24(12):1831-1842. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.008. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
9
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
10
Experiences of gynecological cancer patients receiving care from specialist nurses: a qualitative systematic review.妇科癌症患者接受专科护士护理的体验:一项定性系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Aug;15(8):2087-2112. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003126.

引用本文的文献

1
Decomposition and comparative analysis of urban-rural disparity in attitude towards advance care planning among Chinese adults: A nationwide study.中国成年人对预立医疗照护计划态度的城乡差异分解与比较分析:一项全国性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 13;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21298-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.促进健康的社区资产维度。一项系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115758.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
3
Preference and Influencing Factors of Advance Care Planning for Chinese Elderly Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Mixed-Methods Approach.
慢性病老年患者的优先选择和影响因素的预先护理计划:混合方法研究。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021 Apr 1;23(2):178-186. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000734.
4
Association between direct interpersonal involvement with a dying family member and discussions regarding advance care planning among Japanese older adults.直接与临终家庭成员接触与日本老年人开展预先护理计划讨论之间的关联。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Feb;21(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14114. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
5
Awareness and Attitudes Toward Advance Care Planning Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in China: A Mixed-Methods Study.中国社区居住的老年人群对预先医疗照护计划的认知和态度:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Sep;37(9):743-749. doi: 10.1177/1049909120905255. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Looking Back at Withdrawal of Life-Support Law and Policy to See What Lies Ahead for Medical Aid-in-Dying.回顾生命支持撤出法律和政策,以展望医疗辅助自杀的未来。
Yale J Biol Med. 2019 Dec 20;92(4):781-791. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Preventing unwanted situations and gaining trust: a qualitative study of older people and families' experiences with advance care planning in the daily practice of primary care.预防不良情况并赢得信任:一项关于老年人及家庭在初级保健日常实践中进行预先护理规划经历的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 5;37(4):519-524. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz089.
8
Advance Directive Preferences Among Terminally Ill Older Patients and Its Facilitators and Barriers in China: A Scoping Review.中国终末期老年患者的预先指示偏好及其促进因素和障碍:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Nov;20(11):1356-1361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
9
The experience of advance care planning discussion among older residents in a long-term care institution: A qualitative study.长期护理机构中老年人参与预先医疗护理计划讨论的体验:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Oct;28(19-20):3451-3458. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14936. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
How Should End-of-Life Advance Care Planning Discussions Be Implemented According to Patients and Informal Carers? A Qualitative Review of Reviews.根据患者和非正式照护者的意见,应当如何实施临终关怀预先计划讨论?系统评价的定性综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):311-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 Apr 18.