Alqarni Dhaifallah, Nakajima Masatoshi, Tagami Junji, Alzahrani Mohammed S, Sá-Pinto Ana Clara, Alghamdi Ali, Hosaka Keiichi, Alzahrani Fouad, Alsadon Omar A, Alharbi Raed A, Almalki Shaia S, Alzahrani Abdullah Ali H
Restorative and Prosthodontic Department, Almikhawah Dental Center, Al-Baha, SAU.
Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry/Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, JPN.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 25;15(4):e38090. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38090. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Biofilm deposit on the composite restoration is a common phenomenon and bacterial growth follows the deposition. The study aims to evaluate () early biofilm formation on the surfaces of various dental composite resins by using the real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) technique.
Thirty-two discs, where eight discs were in each group of Filtek Supreme Ultra (FSU; 3M, St. Paul, MN), Clearfil AP-X (APX; Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan), Beautifil II (BE2; Shofu, Inc., Kyoto, Japan), and Estelite Sigma Quick (ESQ; Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan), were fabricated and subjected to biofilm formation in an oral biofilm reactor for 12 hours. Contact angles (CA) were measured on the freshly fabricated specimen. The attached biofilms underwent fluorescent microscopy (FM). from biofilms were analyzed using a qPCR technique. Surface roughness (Sa) measurements were taken before and after biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), including energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) analysis, was also performed for detecting relative elements on biofilms.
The study showed that FSU demonstrated the lowest CA while APX presented the highest values. FM revealed that condensed biofilm clusters were most on FSU. The qPCR results indicated the highest DNA copies in the biofilm were on FSU while BE2 was the lowest (p < 0.05). Sa test signified that APX was significantly the lowest among all materials while FSU was the highest (p < 0.05). SEM displayed areas with apparently glucan-free more on BE2 compared to APX and ESQ, while FSU had the least. Small white particles detected predominantly on the biofilms of BE2 appeared to be Si, Al, and F extruded from the resin.
Differences in early biofilm formation onto various composite resins are dependent on the differences in material compositions and their surface properties. BE2 showed the lowest quantity of biofilm accumulation compared to other resin composites (APX, ESQ, and FSU). This could be attributed to BE2 proprieties as a giomer and fluoride content.
复合树脂修复体上的生物膜沉积是一种常见现象,细菌生长伴随着沉积过程。本研究旨在通过实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)技术评估不同牙科复合树脂表面的早期生物膜形成情况。
制作32个圆盘,每组8个,分别为Filtek Supreme Ultra(FSU;3M公司,圣保罗,明尼苏达州)、Clearfil AP-X(APX;可乐丽诺瑞特牙科公司,东京,日本)、Beautifil II(BE2;松风株式会社,京都,日本)和Estelite Sigma Quick(ESQ;德山牙科,东京,日本)。将其置于口腔生物膜反应器中进行12小时的生物膜形成。在新制作的样本上测量接触角(CA)。对附着的生物膜进行荧光显微镜(FM)观察。使用qPCR技术分析生物膜中的 。在生物膜形成前后测量表面粗糙度(Sa)。还进行了扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查,包括能量色散X射线光谱仪(EDS)分析,以检测生物膜上的相关元素。
研究表明,FSU的接触角最低,而APX的接触角最高。FM显示,FSU上的浓缩生物膜簇最多。qPCR结果表明,生物膜中DNA拷贝数最高的是FSU,而BE2最低(p < 0.05)。Sa测试表明,APX在所有材料中表面粗糙度显著最低,而FSU最高(p < 0.05)。SEM显示,与APX和ESQ相比,BE2上明显无葡聚糖的区域更多,而FSU上最少。在BE2生物膜上检测到的主要白色小颗粒似乎是从树脂中挤出的硅、铝和氟。
不同复合树脂上早期生物膜形成的差异取决于材料成分及其表面性质的差异。与其他树脂复合材料(APX、ESQ和FSU)相比,BE2的生物膜积累量最低。这可能归因于BE2作为聚硅氧烷omer的特性和氟含量。