• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性在低负荷血流限制抗阻训练中肌肉大小和力量的反应模式及变化时间进程。

Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

机构信息

Division of Kinesiology, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Central Florida, 12494 University Boulevard, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.

Florida Space Institute, Partnership I, University of Central Florida, Research Parkway, Orlando, FL, 32826, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1473-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04627-2. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00421-021-04627-2
PMID:33638690
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the individual and composite patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size, strength, and edema throughout a 4 week low-load blood flow restriction (LLBFR) resistance training intervention.

METHODS

Twenty recreationally active women (mean ± SD; 23 ± 3 years) participated in this investigation and were randomly assigned to 4 weeks (3/week) of LLBFR (n = 10) or control (n = 10) group. Resistance training consisted of 75 reciprocal isokinetic forearm flexion-extension muscle actions performed at 30% of peak torque. Strength and ultrasound-based assessments were determined at each training session.

RESULTS

There were quadratic increases for composite muscle thickness (R = 0.998), concentric peak torque (R = 0.962), and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque (R = 0.980) data for the LLBFR group. For muscle thickness, seven of ten subjects exceeded the minimal difference (MD) of 0.16 cm during the very early phase (laboratory visits 1-7) of the intervention compared to three of ten subjects that exceeded MD for either concentric peak torque (3.7 Nm) or MVIC (2.2 Nm) during this same time period. There was a linear increase for composite echo intensity (r = 0.563) as a result of LLBFR resistance training, but eight of ten subjects never exceeded the MD of 14.2 Au.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that the increases in muscle thickness for the LLBFR group were not associated with edema and changes in echo intensity should be examined on a subject-by-subject basis. Furthermore, LLBFR forearm flexion-extension resistance training elicited real increases in muscle size during the very early phase of training that occurred prior to real increases in muscle strength.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨个体和综合反应模式以及肌肉大小、力量和水肿在四周低负荷血流限制(LLBFR)抗阻训练干预过程中的时程变化。

方法

20 名有规律运动的女性(平均±标准差;23±3 岁)参与了本研究,并被随机分为 4 周(每周 3 次)的 LLBFR(n=10)或对照组(n=10)。抗阻训练包括 75 次 30%峰值扭矩的反向等速前臂屈伸运动。每次训练均进行力量和超声评估。

结果

LLBFR 组的复合肌肉厚度(R=0.998)、向心峰力矩(R=0.962)和最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)力矩(R=0.980)数据呈二次增加。对于肌肉厚度,在干预的早期阶段(实验室访问 1-7),有 7/10 的受试者超过了 0.16cm 的最小差值(MD),而在同一时期,有 3/10 的受试者的向心峰力矩(3.7Nm)或 MVIC(2.2Nm)超过 MD。LLBFR 抗阻训练导致复合回声强度呈线性增加(r=0.563),但有 8/10 的受试者从未超过 14.2Au 的 MD。

结论

这些发现表明,LLBFR 组肌肉厚度的增加与水肿无关,应根据个体情况检查回声强度的变化。此外,LLBFR 前臂屈伸抗阻训练在训练的早期阶段(即在肌肉力量真正增加之前)引起了肌肉大小的真实增加。

相似文献

1
Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.女性在低负荷血流限制抗阻训练中肌肉大小和力量的反应模式及变化时间进程。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 May;121(5):1473-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04627-2. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
2
Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.低负荷血流限制训练比非血流限制抗阻训练引起更大的向心力量,但等长力量和肌肉大小相似。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Feb;120(2):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04287-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
3
Greater neuromuscular fatigue following low-load blood flow restriction than non-blood flow restriction resistance exercise among recreationally active men.在业余活跃男性中,低负荷血流限制比非血流限制抗阻运动后神经肌肉疲劳更大。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul 1;128(1):73-85. doi: 10.1152/jn.00028.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
Early phase adaptations in muscle strength and hypertrophy as a result of low-intensity blood flow restriction resistance training.低强度血流限制抗阻训练导致的肌肉力量和肥大的早期适应。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):1831-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3918-8. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction.低负荷血流限制与非血流限制之间,肌肉厚度、水肿和血流的急性变化并无差异。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2021 Sep;41(5):452-460. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12720. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
6
Acute effects of low load blood flow restricted and non restricted exercise on muscle excitation, neuromuscular efficiency, and average torque.低负荷血流限制和非限制运动对肌肉兴奋、神经肌肉效率和平均扭矩的急性影响。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2023 Jun 1;23(2):165-174.
7
Eccentric and concentric blood flow restriction resistance training on indices of delayed onset muscle soreness in untrained women.离心和向心血流限制抗阻训练对未经训练女性延迟性肌肉酸痛指标的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Oct;119(10):2363-2373. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04220-8. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
8
Effects of Strength and Conditioning on Maximal Isometric Strength, Motor Unit Behavior, and Concentric Isokinetic Peak Torque in Middle-School Boys'.力量与体能训练对初中男生最大等长肌力、运动单位行为及等速向心峰值扭矩的影响
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 May 1;36(5):1318-1326. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003643. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
9
Eccentric, but not concentric blood flow restriction resistance training increases muscle strength in the untrained limb.偏心而非同心血流限制阻力训练可增加未训练肢体的肌肉力量。
Phys Ther Sport. 2020 May;43:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
10
Low-Intensity Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction Increases Muscle Strength without Altering hsCRP and Fibrinogen Levels in Healthy Subjects.健康受试者进行低强度血流限制运动可增加肌肉力量,且不改变hsCRP和纤维蛋白原水平。
Chin J Physiol. 2018 Jun;61(3):188-195. doi: 10.4077/CJP.2018.BAG567.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on the Upper Extremities: A Scoping Review.血流限制训练对上肢的影响:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Mar 1;17(3):e79876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79876. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Preserving Knee Health and Delivering Specialized Care for Active Older Athletes.维护膝关节健康并为活跃的老年运动员提供专业护理。
Sports Health. 2025 Mar 27:19417381251326527. doi: 10.1177/19417381251326527.
3
Potential Moderators of the Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Meta-analysis Based on a Comparison with High-Load Resistance Training.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-load blood flow restriction elicits greater concentric strength than non-blood flow restriction resistance training but similar isometric strength and muscle size.低负荷血流限制训练比非血流限制抗阻训练引起更大的向心力量,但等长力量和肌肉大小相似。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Feb;120(2):425-441. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04287-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
2
Eccentric and concentric blood flow restriction resistance training on indices of delayed onset muscle soreness in untrained women.离心和向心血流限制抗阻训练对未经训练女性延迟性肌肉酸痛指标的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 Oct;119(10):2363-2373. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04220-8. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
血流限制训练对肌肉力量和肥大影响的潜在调节因素:基于与高负荷抗阻训练比较的荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2024 May 22;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00719-3.
4
Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy Compared with Traditional Resistance Training in Healthy Adults Older Than 60 Years: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与传统阻力训练相比,低负荷血流限制阻力训练对60岁以上健康成年人肌肉力量和肥大的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 13;11(24):7389. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247389.
5
Effects of blood flow restriction training on anthropometric and blood lipids in overweight/obese adults: Meta-analysis.血流限制训练对超重/肥胖成年人人体测量指标和血脂的影响:荟萃分析。
Front Physiol. 2022 Nov 29;13:1039591. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1039591. eCollection 2022.
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.
血流限制训练:方法学、应用及安全性考量
Front Physiol. 2019 May 15;10:533. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00533. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of Acute Fluid Retention on Ultrasound Echo Intensity.急性液体潴留对超声回声强度的影响。
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jan-Mar;23(1):149-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
5
Is muscle growth a mechanism for increasing strength?肌肉增长是否是增强力量的机制?
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Apr;125:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
The validity of the EMG and MMG techniques to examine muscle hypertrophy.肌电图和肌音图技术检测肌肉肥大的有效性。
Physiol Meas. 2019 Mar 13;40(2):025009. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab057e.
7
Type 1 Muscle Fiber Hypertrophy after Blood Flow-restricted Training in Powerlifters.力量举运动员血流限制训练后的 1 型肌纤维肥大。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Feb;51(2):288-298. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001775.
8
Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women.抗阻训练的男性和女性肘伸肌特征的差异。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Nov;118(11):2359-2366. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3962-4. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Early phase adaptations in muscle strength and hypertrophy as a result of low-intensity blood flow restriction resistance training.低强度血流限制抗阻训练导致的肌肉力量和肥大的早期适应。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):1831-1843. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3918-8. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
10
Blood flow restricted resistance training in older adults at risk of mobility limitations.血流限制阻力训练在有活动能力受限风险的老年人中的应用。
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Dec 1;99:138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 5.