Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Eat Behav. 2023 Aug;50:101754. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101754. Epub 2023 May 20.
Preliminary evidence suggests that hunger and temptation may predict nonadherence to dietary intake goals; however, no studies have investigated the potential interaction between hunger and temptation in relation to dietary nonadherence nor have any investigated whether these associations may be different after the end of active behavioral intervention. Thus, the current study examined the week-to-week associations between hunger, temptation, and dietary adherence in 74 adults with overweight or obesity (mean ± SD age = 50.7 ± 10.4, BMI = 31.2 ± 4.5 kg/m) enrolled in a 12-week, Internet-based weight loss program followed by a 40-week post-intervention observational maintenance period. Each week during the study, participants completed a questionnaire on which they rated their hunger, temptation, and dietary adherence on 7-point scales. Multilevel models demonstrated that higher levels of hunger and temptation were associated with lower ratings of dietary adherence during the same week, ps < 0.0001, such that 1-point higher ratings of hunger or temptation were associated with 0.2- and 0.5-point lower ratings of dietary adherence, respectively. Further, there was an interaction between hunger and temptation such that the association between temptation and dietary nonadherence was stronger when ratings of hunger were lower, p = .028. There were no differences in associations between the initial weight loss period and the maintenance period. Results suggest that hunger and temptation may serve as potential treatment targets for interventions aimed at improving adherence to dietary intake goals. Future studies should investigate whether interventions targeting hunger and temptation can improve dietary adherence and weight loss outcomes.
初步证据表明,饥饿感和诱惑可能会预测饮食摄入目标的不遵守;然而,尚无研究调查饥饿感和诱惑之间的潜在相互作用与饮食不遵守的关系,也没有研究调查这些关联在积极的行为干预结束后是否会有所不同。因此,本研究在 74 名超重或肥胖的成年人(平均年龄 ± 标准差为 50.7 ± 10.4,BMI 为 31.2 ± 4.5 kg/m)中,检查了每周饥饿感、诱惑和饮食遵守之间的关联,这些参与者参加了为期 12 周的基于互联网的减肥计划,随后进行了为期 40 周的干预后观察性维持期。在研究期间的每周,参与者都会完成一份问卷,他们会在问卷上对自己的饥饿感、诱惑和饮食遵守情况进行 7 点评分。多层次模型表明,更高水平的饥饿感和诱惑与同一周内较低的饮食遵守评分相关,p<0.0001,即饥饿感或诱惑的评分每增加 1 分,饮食遵守的评分就会分别降低 0.2 分和 0.5 分。此外,饥饿感和诱惑之间存在相互作用,当饥饿感评分较低时,诱惑与饮食不遵守之间的关联更强,p=0.028。在初始减肥期和维持期之间,关联没有差异。研究结果表明,饥饿感和诱惑可能是提高饮食摄入目标遵守的干预措施的潜在治疗目标。未来的研究应调查针对饥饿感和诱惑的干预措施是否可以改善饮食遵守和减肥效果。