Lewis M A
Stud Fam Plann. 1986 May-Jun;17(3):126-35.
Government-sponsored family planning services in developing countries have traditionally provided free contraceptives to couples who choose to contracept. The advisability of and need for such extensive subsidization is brought into question in this article, based on studies that have compared free and fee-for-service family planning programs. Little difference in demand exists between free and moderately priced services. The importance of price in determining family planning demand is also explored through studies of demand shifts in response to changes in contraceptive prices. Contraceptive price increases in established programs have generally had a minimal effect on utilization. Price reductions in established programs, however, have led to increases in contraceptive demand. These findings suggest that moderate fees can be imposed for family planning services without affecting demand; however, full cost recovery may pose a deterrent to low- and moderate-income couples.
发展中国家由政府资助的计划生育服务传统上一直向选择避孕的夫妇免费提供避孕药具。本文基于对免费和收费计划生育项目的比较研究,对这种大规模补贴的合理性和必要性提出了质疑。免费服务和适度定价服务之间的需求差异不大。通过研究避孕价格变化引起的需求变化,也探讨了价格在决定计划生育需求方面的重要性。现有项目中避孕价格上涨通常对使用率影响极小。然而,现有项目中价格降低导致了避孕需求增加。这些研究结果表明,可以对计划生育服务收取适度费用而不影响需求;然而,完全成本回收可能会对低收入和中等收入夫妇形成阻碍。