Suppr超能文献

他们所了解的恶魔:行业对全氟和多氟烷基物质科学影响的化学文件分析。

The Devil they Knew: Chemical Documents Analysis of Industry Influence on PFAS Science.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, US.

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, US.

出版信息

Ann Glob Health. 2023 Jun 1;89(1):37. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4013. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of widely-used chemicals that persist in the environment and bioaccumulate in humans and animals, becoming an increasing cause for global concern. While PFAS have been commercially produced since the 1940s, their toxicity was not publicly established until the late 1990s. The objective of this paper is to evaluate industry documents on PFAS and compare them to the public health literature in order to understand this consequential delay.

METHODS

We reviewed a collection of previously secret industry documents archived at the UCSF Chemical Industry Documents Library, examining whether and how strategies of corporate manipulation of science were used by manufacturers of PFAS. Using well-established methods of document analysis, we developed deductive codes to assess industry influence on the conduct and publication of research. We also conducted a literature review using standard search strategies to establish when scientific information on the health effects of PFAS became public.

RESULTS

Our review of industry documents shows that companies knew PFAS was "highly toxic when inhaled and moderately toxic when ingested" by 1970, forty years before the public health community. Further, the industry used several strategies that have been shown common to tobacco, pharmaceutical and other industries to influence science and regulation - most notably, suppressing unfavorable research and distorting public discourse. We did not find evidence in this archive of funding favorable research or targeted dissemination of those results.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of transparency in industry-driven research on industrial chemicals has significant legal, political and public health consequences. Industry strategies to suppress scientific research findings or early warnings about the hazards of industrial chemicals can be analyzed and exposed, in order to guide prevention.

摘要

背景

全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是一类广泛使用的化学物质,它们在环境中持久存在,并在人类和动物体内生物累积,成为全球日益关注的问题。虽然 PFAS 自 20 世纪 40 年代以来就已商业化生产,但直到 20 世纪 90 年代末才公开确定其毒性。本文的目的是评估关于 PFAS 的行业文件,并将其与公共卫生文献进行比较,以了解这一后果性的延迟。

方法

我们审查了 UCSF 化学工业文献图书馆存档的一组先前保密的行业文件,以研究 PFAS 制造商是否以及如何使用企业操纵科学的策略。我们使用成熟的文件分析方法,制定了演绎代码来评估行业对研究的进行和发表的影响。我们还使用标准搜索策略进行了文献综述,以确定关于 PFAS 健康影响的科学信息何时公开。

结果

我们对行业文件的审查表明,早在公众了解到 PFAS 毒性的 40 年前,即 1970 年,公司就已经知道 PFAS“吸入时毒性很高,摄入时毒性中等”。此外,该行业使用了一些已被证明在烟草、制药和其他行业中常见的策略来影响科学和法规——最值得注意的是,压制不利的研究和扭曲公众话语。我们在这个档案中没有发现支持有利研究或有针对性地传播这些结果的证据。

结论

在工业化学品的行业驱动研究中缺乏透明度,会产生重大的法律、政治和公共卫生后果。可以分析和揭露行业压制科学研究结果或对工业化学品危害的早期预警的策略,以指导预防。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e48/10237242/48b8e38129bc/agh-89-1-4013-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Devil they Knew: Chemical Documents Analysis of Industry Influence on PFAS Science.
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Jun 1;89(1):37. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4013. eCollection 2023.
2
Historical and current usage of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A literature review.
Am J Ind Med. 2023 May;66(5):353-378. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23362. Epub 2022 May 25.
3
Advancing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) research: an overview of ATSDR and NCEH activities and recommendations.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;31(6):961-971. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00316-6. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Occupational exposure and serum levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A review.
Am J Ind Med. 2023 May;66(5):379-392. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23454. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
6
Emerging contaminants, coerced ignorance and environmental health concerns: The case of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Mar;43(3):764-778. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13253. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Trends in the Regulation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): A Scoping Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;18(20):10900. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010900.
8
The opioid industry document archive: New directions in research on corporate political strategy.
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Apr;114:103997. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103997. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
A review of recent studies on toxicity, sequestration, and degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Aug 15;436:129120. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129120. Epub 2022 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
How criminology can support environmental health: the case of PFAS.
Environ Health. 2025 Aug 20;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12940-025-01214-2.
2
Evaluation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Levels in Drinking Water: A Study of Riverside Municipal Wells.
Cureus. 2025 Jun 14;17(6):e85995. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85995. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Complementing global chemicals management through shaping consumer behavior.
iScience. 2025 May 19;28(6):112700. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112700. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
7
Dioxins vs. PFAS: Science and Policy Challenges.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Aug;132(8):85003. doi: 10.1289/EHP14449. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
8
A second hit by PFOS exposure exacerbated developmental defects in medaka embryos with a history of ancestral BPA exposure.
Chemosphere. 2024 Aug;362:142796. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142796. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
9
PFAS alters placental arterial vasculature in term human placentae: A prospective pregnancy cohort study.
Placenta. 2024 Apr;149:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
10
Conflicts of Interest in the Assessment of Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Dec 5;57(48):19066-19077. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c04213. Epub 2023 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

2
EPA's Unprecedented Interim Drinking Water Health Advisories for PFOA and PFOS.
Ground Water. 2023 May-Jun;61(3):301-303. doi: 10.1111/gwat.13303. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
3
Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class.
Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2020 Aug 11;7(8):532-543. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00255. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
4
Advancing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) research: an overview of ATSDR and NCEH activities and recommendations.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;31(6):961-971. doi: 10.1038/s41370-021-00316-6. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
6
Review: Evolution of evidence on PFOA and health following the assessments of the C8 Science Panel.
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:106125. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106125. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Nov;108(11):e9-e16. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304677. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
9
Ten tips for spotting industry involvement in science policy.
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054386. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
10
The Pharmaceuticalization of the Tobacco Industry.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):278-280. doi: 10.7326/M17-0759. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验