Talyshinskii Ali, Bakhman Guliev, Hameed Bm Zeeshan, Pietropaolo Amelia, Naik Nithesh, Somani Bhaskar K
Department of Urology, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Urology Center with Robot-Assisted Surgery, Mariinsky Hospital, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 May 29;15:17562872231176368. doi: 10.1177/17562872231176368. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
Several mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps are available in various marketplaces, but there is still concern about their accuracy, data safety, and regulation. The goal of this review was to critically analyze the mobile apps created for education, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of patients with kidney stone disease (KSD), as well as to assess the level of data security, the contribution of physicians in their development and adherence to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) guidance. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (September 2022), in the Apple App Store and Google Play store using relevant keywords and inclusion criteria. Information was extracted for the name of the app, primary and additional functionalities, release and last update, number of downloads, number of marks and average rating, Android/iOS compatibility, initial and in-app payments, data safety statement, physician involvement statement, and FDA/MDR guidance. A total of 986 apps and 222 articles were reviewed, of which based on the inclusion, 83 apps were finally analyzed. The apps were allocated to six categories about their primary purpose: education ( = 8), fluid trackers ( = 54), food content description and calculators ( = 11), diagnosis ( = 3), pre- and intra-operative application ( = 4), and stent trackers ( = 2). Of these apps, the number of apps supported for Android, iOS, and both of them were 36, 23, and 23, respectively. Despite a wide range of apps available for KSD, the participation of doctors in their development, data security, and functionality remains insufficient. Further development of mHealth should be carried out properly under the supervision of urological associations involving patient support groups, and these apps must be regularly updated for their content and data security.
多个市场上都有几种移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序,但人们仍对其准确性、数据安全性和监管问题感到担忧。本综述的目的是严格分析为肾结石疾病(KSD)患者的教育、诊断以及医疗和手术治疗而创建的移动应用程序,同时评估数据安全水平、医生在其开发中的贡献以及对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和医疗器械法规(MDR)指南的遵守情况。使用PubMed(2022年9月)以及在苹果应用商店和谷歌Play商店中,通过相关关键词和纳入标准进行了全面的文献检索。提取了应用程序的名称、主要和附加功能、发布和最后更新时间、下载次数、评分数量和平均评分、安卓/ iOS兼容性、初始和应用内支付、数据安全声明、医生参与声明以及FDA / MDR指南等信息。共审查了986个应用程序和222篇文章,其中根据纳入标准,最终分析了83个应用程序。这些应用程序根据其主要用途分为六类:教育类(= 8个)、液体追踪器类(= 54个)、食物成分描述和计算器类(= 11个)、诊断类(= 3个)、术前和术中应用类(= 4个)以及支架追踪器类(= 2个)。在这些应用程序中,支持安卓、iOS以及两者都支持的应用程序数量分别为36个、23个和23个。尽管有大量针对KSD的应用程序,但医生在其开发、数据安全和功能方面的参与仍然不足。移动医疗的进一步发展应在涉及患者支持团体的泌尿外科协会的监督下妥善进行,并且这些应用程序必须定期更新其内容和数据安全性。