• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国大型儿科医院拥有的移动应用程序的现状:对谷歌Play商店和苹果应用商店的系统搜索与分析

The Current State of Mobile Apps Owned by Large Pediatric Hospitals in the United States: Systematic Search and Analysis on Google Play and Apple App Stores.

作者信息

Lieser Tyler, Huang Yungui, Sezgin Emre

机构信息

The Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Oct 6;5(4):e38940. doi: 10.2196/38940.

DOI:10.2196/38940
PMID:36201385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9585439/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pediatric hospitals in the United States are increasingly leveraging patient-facing mobile apps as their digital front doors for patients, families, and caretakers. These mobile health apps are sanctioned by pediatric hospitals to inform the public or populations about pediatric care to provide individualized information, to enhance communication, and to improve patient experience. Yet the functionalities and user feedback of these hospital mobile apps have not been systematically investigated.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to understand the current state of hospital-owned mobile apps provided by large pediatric hospitals, comparatively analyze and report the services provided, and identify potential gaps to inform developers and providers. The American Hospital Association defines large hospitals as those having a bed count of more than 400.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on Google Play and Apple App Store to identify all hospital-owned mobile apps from the large pediatric hospitals included in our review. Our inclusion criteria were (1) apps provided by large pediatric hospitals; (2) hospital-owned apps available in Apple App Store and Google Play; and (3) apps that are provided for general populations. Specialty apps that serve specific user groups or populations focusing on education, telehealth, specific conditions or procedures, or apps intended for research or clinician use were excluded. The features and functionality of the included apps were examined.

RESULTS

Of the 16 pediatric hospitals included in our review, 4 (25%) had no general patient-facing apps, 4 (25%) had one app, and 8 (50%) had more than one app available on Google Play or Apple App Store. The 12 hospitals with at least one mobile app had a combined total of 72 apps. Of these 72 apps, 61 (85%) were considered specialty and were excluded from our review, leaving a total of 11 (15%) apps to analyze. Among the 11 apps analyzed, the most common feature was appointment scheduling or reminder (n=9, 82%). Doctor search (n=8, 73%) and patient resources (n=8, 73%) were the second most common, followed by payment, billing, or claims (n=7, 64%), patient portal integration (n=6, 55%), personal health management (n=6, 55%), hospital way finding (n=5, 45%), message a provider (n=4, 36%), urgent care wait times (n=4, 36%), video chat (n=4, 36%), and health information access (n=4, 36%). Parking information (n=3, 27%) was the least common.

CONCLUSIONS

Out of the 16 pediatric hospitals identified for our review, 75% (n=12) offer mobile apps. Based on the most common features, these apps were intended to help improve accessibility for patients and families in terms of finding providers, scheduling appointments, and accessing patient resources. We believe the findings will inform pediatric hospital administrators, developers, and other stakeholders to improve app feature offerings and increase their impact on service accessibility and patient experience.

摘要

背景

美国的儿科医院越来越多地利用面向患者的移动应用程序作为其面向患者、家庭和护理人员的数字前门。这些移动健康应用程序得到儿科医院的认可,用于向公众或特定人群提供儿科护理信息,以提供个性化信息、加强沟通并改善患者体验。然而,这些医院移动应用程序的功能和用户反馈尚未得到系统研究。

目的

我们的目标是了解大型儿科医院提供的医院自有移动应用程序的现状,比较分析并报告所提供的服务,识别潜在差距,为开发者和提供者提供参考。美国医院协会将大型医院定义为床位超过400张的医院。

方法

我们在谷歌应用商店和苹果应用商店进行了系统搜索,以识别我们综述中纳入的大型儿科医院提供的所有医院自有移动应用程序。我们的纳入标准为:(1)大型儿科医院提供的应用程序;(2)在苹果应用商店和谷歌应用商店中可用的医院自有应用程序;(3)面向普通人群的应用程序。为特定用户群体或人群提供服务、专注于教育、远程医疗、特定病症或程序的专科应用程序,或用于研究或临床医生使用的应用程序被排除在外。对纳入应用程序的功能和特性进行了检查。

结果

在我们综述中纳入的16家儿科医院中,4家(25%)没有面向普通患者的应用程序,4家(25%)有1个应用程序,8家(50%)在谷歌应用商店或苹果应用商店有多个应用程序。拥有至少一个移动应用程序的12家医院共有72个应用程序。在这72个应用程序中,61个(85%)被视为专科应用程序,被排除在我们的综述之外,剩下11个(15%)应用程序进行分析。在分析的11个应用程序中,最常见的功能是预约安排或提醒(n = 9,82%)。医生搜索(n = 8,73%)和患者资源(n = 8,73%)是第二常见的功能,其次是支付、计费或理赔(n = 7,64%)、患者门户集成(n = 6,55%)、个人健康管理(n = 6,55%)、医院导航(n = 5,45%)、向提供者发送消息(n = 4,36%)、紧急护理等待时间(n = 4,36%)、视频聊天(n = 4,36%)和健康信息获取(n = 4,36%)。停车信息(n = 3,27%)是最不常见的功能。

结论

在我们确定进行综述的16家儿科医院中,75%(n = 12)提供移动应用程序。基于最常见的功能,这些应用程序旨在帮助患者和家庭在寻找医疗服务提供者、安排预约和获取患者资源方面提高可及性。我们相信这些发现将为儿科医院管理人员、开发者和其他利益相关者提供参考,以改进应用程序功能并增强其对服务可及性和患者体验的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9585439/29c3e5a2ae6a/pediatrics_v5i4e38940_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9585439/0279b73d4a4c/pediatrics_v5i4e38940_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9585439/29c3e5a2ae6a/pediatrics_v5i4e38940_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9585439/0279b73d4a4c/pediatrics_v5i4e38940_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b7/9585439/29c3e5a2ae6a/pediatrics_v5i4e38940_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
The Current State of Mobile Apps Owned by Large Pediatric Hospitals in the United States: Systematic Search and Analysis on Google Play and Apple App Stores.美国大型儿科医院拥有的移动应用程序的现状:对谷歌Play商店和苹果应用商店的系统搜索与分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Oct 6;5(4):e38940. doi: 10.2196/38940.
2
mHealth Apps in the Digital Marketplace for Pediatric Patients With Cancer: Systematic Search and Analysis.面向癌症患儿的数字市场中的移动健康应用程序:系统检索与分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024 Oct 1;7:e58101. doi: 10.2196/58101.
3
A Systematic Review of Apps using Mobile Criteria for Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention (mCAPP).一项使用青少年怀孕预防移动标准(mCAPP)的应用程序的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Nov 10;4(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6611.
4
Hospital-Owned Apps in Taiwan: Nationwide Survey.台湾地区医院自有应用程序:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 16;6(1):e22. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8636.
5
Evaluating Chinese Mobile Health Apps for Ankylosing Spondylitis Management: Systematic App Search.评估用于强直性脊柱炎管理的中文移动医疗应用程序:系统应用搜索。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 14;9(7):e27234. doi: 10.2196/27234.
6
mHealth Apps for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.用于肌肉骨骼康复的移动健康应用程序:在应用商店中的系统搜索与内容分析
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Aug 1;9(3):e34355. doi: 10.2196/34355.
7
Listening to Stakeholders Involved in Speech-Language Therapy for Children With Communication Disorders: Content Analysis of Apple App Store Reviews.倾听参与沟通障碍儿童言语治疗的利益相关者的意见:苹果应用商店评论的内容分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Jan 21;5(1):e28661. doi: 10.2196/28661.
8
Evaluation of Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Support Physiotherapy Care: Systematic Review.评估面向患者的移动应用程序以支持物理治疗护理:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 4;12:e55003. doi: 10.2196/55003.
9
Mobile Apps for Medication Management: Review and Analysis.移动医疗应用程序在药物管理中的应用:综述与分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 11;7(9):e13608. doi: 10.2196/13608.
10
Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Support Physiotherapy Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Apps Within App Stores.支持物理治疗护理的面向患者的移动应用程序:应用商店内应用程序系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Dec 9;10(12):e29047. doi: 10.2196/29047.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of information and communication technologies to improve the knowledge of hospitalized patients: systematic review.信息通信技术提高住院患者知识水平的有效性:系统评价
Rev Cuid. 2024 Aug 13;15(2):e3854. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.3854. eCollection 2024 May-Aug.
2
Transcreating BMT4me: A protocol for adapting an mobile health medication adherence app for Spanish-speaking caregivers in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant.改编BMT4me:为儿科造血干细胞移植中讲西班牙语的护理人员适配一款移动健康药物依从性应用程序的方案。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 2;11:20552076241297218. doi: 10.1177/20552076241297218. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
ACCU3RATE: A mobile health application rating scale based on user reviews.ACCU3RATE:基于用户评价的移动健康应用评级量表。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0258050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258050. eCollection 2021.
2
Hospital Investment Decisions in Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Framework for Exploring Challenges, Trends, and Research Directions.医疗 4.0 技术下的医院投资决策:探索挑战、趋势和研究方向的范围综述和框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 26;23(8):e27571. doi: 10.2196/27571.
3
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.
PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.
4
Mobile App-Based Remote Patient Monitoring in Acute Medical Conditions: Prospective Feasibility Study Exploring Digital Health Solutions on Clinical Workload During the COVID Crisis.急性疾病中基于移动应用的远程患者监测:探索新冠疫情期间数字健康解决方案对临床工作量影响的前瞻性可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jan 15;5(1):e23190. doi: 10.2196/23190.
5
Developments in Privacy and Data Ownership in Mobile Health Technologies, 2016-2019.移动医疗技术中隐私和数据所有权的发展,2016-2019。
Yearb Med Inform. 2020 Aug;29(1):32-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701987. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Implications of Language Barriers for Healthcare: A Systematic Review.语言障碍对医疗保健的影响:一项系统综述。
Oman Med J. 2020 Apr 30;35(2):e122. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.40. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.从安全角度看移动健康应用的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223. doi: 10.2196/11223.
8
The Use of Mobile Health Applications to Improve Patient Experience: Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Public Hospitals.使用移动健康应用程序改善患者体验:中国公立医院的横断面研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 23;6(5):e126. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9145.
9
Mobile Health Applications for Pediatric Care: Review and Comparison.用于儿科护理的移动健康应用程序:综述与比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 May;52(3):383-391. doi: 10.1177/2168479017725557. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
10
Hospital-Owned Apps in Taiwan: Nationwide Survey.台湾地区医院自有应用程序:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 16;6(1):e22. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8636.