School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Operating Room, Affiliated Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1130628. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130628. eCollection 2023.
While the research on improving individual health literacy by promoting individual skills and abilities is increasing, less attention has been paid to the complexities of the healthcare environment that may influence patients' ability to access, understand, and apply health information and health services to make health decisions. This study aimed to develop and validate a Health Literacy Environment Scale (HLES) that is suitable for Chinese culture.
This study was conducted in two phases. First, using the Person-Centered Care (PCC) framework as a theoretical framework, initial items were developed by using the existing health literacy environment (HLE) related measurement tools, literature review, qualitative interviews, and the researcher's clinical experience. Second, scale development was based on two rounds of Delphi expert consultation and a pre-test conducted with 20 hospitalized patients. Using 697 hospitalized patients from three sample hospitals, the initial scale was developed after item screening and its reliability and validity were evaluated.
The HLES comprised 30 items classified into three dimensions as follows: interpersonal (11 items), clinical (9 items), and structural (10 items) dimensions. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the HLES was 0.960 and the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.844. The confirmatory factor analysis verified the three-factor model after allowing for the correlation of five pairs of error terms. The goodness-of-fit indices signified a good fit for the model (/df = 2.766, RMSEA = 0.069, RMR = 0.053, CFI = 0.902, IFI = 0.903, TLI = 0.893, GFI = 0.826, PNFI = 0.781, PCFI = 0.823, PGFI = 0.705). The item-content validity index ranged from 0.91 to 1.00, and the scale-content validity index was 0.90.
The HLES had good reliability and validity and provides a patient perspective tool for evaluating HLE and a new perspective for improving health literacy in China. That is, healthcare organizations make it easier for patients to access, understand, and use health information and service. Further studies about the validity and reliability of HLE should include other districts and different tiers or types of healthcare organizations.
虽然通过提高个人技能和能力来提高个人健康素养的研究正在增加,但对可能影响患者获取、理解和应用健康信息和健康服务以做出健康决策能力的医疗环境的复杂性关注较少。本研究旨在开发和验证适合中国文化的健康素养环境量表(HLES)。
本研究分两个阶段进行。首先,使用以人为中心的护理(PCC)框架作为理论框架,利用现有的健康素养环境(HLE)相关测量工具、文献回顾、定性访谈和研究人员的临床经验,制定初始项目。其次,基于两轮德尔菲专家咨询和对 20 名住院患者的预测试,对量表进行了开发。采用来自三所样本医院的 697 名住院患者,经过项目筛选,对初始量表进行了评估,评价其信度和效度。
HLES 包含 30 个项目,分为人际(11 个项目)、临床(9 个项目)和结构(10 个项目)三个维度。HLES 的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.960,组内相关系数为 0.844。在允许五个对误差项相关的情况下,验证了验证性因子分析后的三因素模型。拟合优度指数表明该模型具有良好的拟合度(/df=2.766,RMSEA=0.069,RMR=0.053,CFI=0.902,IFI=0.903,TLI=0.893,GFI=0.826,PNFI=0.781,PCFI=0.823,PGFI=0.705)。项目内容效度指数范围为 0.91 至 1.00,量表内容效度指数为 0.90。
HLES 具有良好的信度和效度,为评估 HLE 提供了一个从患者角度出发的工具,为提高中国的健康素养提供了一个新视角。也就是说,医疗机构要让患者更容易地获取、理解和使用健康信息和服务。关于 HLE 的有效性和可靠性的进一步研究应包括其他地区和不同层次或类型的医疗机构。