• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国健康素养医疗组织指数体系:基于CiteSpace和定性分析

A Health Literate Healthcare Organization Index System for China: Based on CiteSpace and Qualitative Analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Shenyu, Chen Yang, Xia Xiyang, Zhou Jing, Wang Xiaoyu, Sun Qing, Chang Jiaqian, Ge Jiaying, Hu Lingmin, Lu Renjie

机构信息

Changzhou Third People's Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Department of Reproduction, Changzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 1;18:3065-3090. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S520366. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S520366
PMID:40475227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12139633/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the current status and development trends of health literate healthcare organization (HLHO) worldwide, and preliminarily construct an index system suitable for HLHO in China.

METHODS

This study first utilized CiteSpace for bibliometric analysis to explore global research hotspots and trends in HLHO. Based on these findings, expert opinions were gathered through focus group interviews to preliminarily develop the index system. Finally, semi-structured interviews in primary hospitals were conducted to optimize the system, assess its adaptability, and collect feedback for refinement.

RESULTS

CiteSpace bibliometric analysis identified high-frequency themes-including health literacy, education, service, communication, health information, digital healthcare, special populations, community, and management-as the primary indices of HLHO. Based on expert input from focus group discussions, an index system comprising 14 primary and 120 secondary indices was developed, covering key domains such as organizational management, health education, provider-patient communication, self-management, digital services, and support for vulnerable groups. Further expert interviews indicated that the system also had good local adaptability and strong potential for broader implementation in primary hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The index system developed in this study provides both a theoretical framework and a practical tool to support the standardized construction of health-literate healthcare organizations in China. It not only integrates cutting-edge international experience but also aligns with the practical needs of the Chinese healthcare context, demonstrating strong adaptability and relevance. The system is expected to facilitate hospital self-assessment, quality improvement, patient support, and health education efforts, thereby laying a solid foundation for enhancing healthcare service quality and improving patients' health literacy. Moving forward, our research team will continue to optimize the index system for practical use, and initiate multicenter pilot studies and quantitative scale development to strengthen its operability and value for broader implementation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析全球健康素养医疗组织(HLHO)的现状和发展趋势,并初步构建适合中国HLHO的指标体系。

方法

本研究首先利用CiteSpace进行文献计量分析,以探索HLHO的全球研究热点和趋势。基于这些发现,通过焦点小组访谈收集专家意见,初步构建指标体系。最后,在基层医院进行半结构化访谈,以优化该体系,评估其适用性,并收集反馈意见进行完善。

结果

CiteSpace文献计量分析确定了高频主题,包括健康素养、教育、服务、沟通、健康信息、数字医疗、特殊人群、社区和管理,作为HLHO的主要指标。基于焦点小组讨论中的专家意见,开发了一个包含14个一级指标和120个二级指标的指标体系,涵盖组织管理、健康教育、医患沟通、自我管理、数字服务和弱势群体支持等关键领域。进一步的专家访谈表明,该体系在当地也具有良好的适用性,在基层医院广泛实施的潜力很大。

结论

本研究开发的指标体系为支持中国健康素养医疗组织的标准化建设提供了理论框架和实践工具。它不仅整合了前沿的国际经验,还符合中国医疗环境的实际需求,具有很强的适用性和相关性。该体系有望促进医院的自我评估、质量改进、患者支持和健康教育工作,从而为提高医疗服务质量和提升患者健康素养奠定坚实基础。展望未来,我们的研究团队将继续优化指标体系以供实际应用,并启动多中心试点研究和定量量表开发,以加强其可操作性和广泛实施的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/5f936a9d4c16/JMDH-18-3065-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/691b62a53759/JMDH-18-3065-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/f89c447645e1/JMDH-18-3065-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/073e23f98119/JMDH-18-3065-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/5758c14feb70/JMDH-18-3065-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/07fb619a97e4/JMDH-18-3065-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/412b8a82f926/JMDH-18-3065-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/d970f8da1e1f/JMDH-18-3065-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/937472749d96/JMDH-18-3065-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/567ba92f5113/JMDH-18-3065-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/c7f4c4c73b1e/JMDH-18-3065-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/5f936a9d4c16/JMDH-18-3065-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/691b62a53759/JMDH-18-3065-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/f89c447645e1/JMDH-18-3065-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/073e23f98119/JMDH-18-3065-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/5758c14feb70/JMDH-18-3065-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/07fb619a97e4/JMDH-18-3065-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/412b8a82f926/JMDH-18-3065-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/d970f8da1e1f/JMDH-18-3065-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/937472749d96/JMDH-18-3065-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/567ba92f5113/JMDH-18-3065-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/c7f4c4c73b1e/JMDH-18-3065-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e10/12139633/5f936a9d4c16/JMDH-18-3065-g0011.jpg

相似文献

1
A Health Literate Healthcare Organization Index System for China: Based on CiteSpace and Qualitative Analysis.中国健康素养医疗组织指数体系:基于CiteSpace和定性分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 1;18:3065-3090. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S520366. eCollection 2025.
2
Analysis of Influencing Factors of Organizational Health Literacy in Healthcare Institutions in Beijing, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国北京医疗机构组织健康素养的影响因素分析:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Sep 20;17:2281-2290. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S472993. eCollection 2024.
3
Health-Literate Healthcare Organizations and Quality of Care in Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in Tuscany.卫生素养型医疗机构与医院医疗质量:托斯卡纳地区的横断面研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):2508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072508.
4
The health literate health care organization 10 item questionnaire (HLHO-10): development and validation.具备健康素养的医疗保健组织10项调查问卷(HLHO - 10):编制与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb 1;15:47. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0707-5.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The Journey to Become a Health Literate Organization: A Snapshot of Health System Improvement.成为具备健康素养组织的历程:卫生系统改进概况
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:203-237.
8
Organizational health literacy in German hospitals: a cross-sectional survey among hospital managers.德国医院的组织健康素养:一项针对医院管理者的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 13;24(1):1227. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11649-x.
9
Implementing routine assessment of perinatal anxiety: case studies.实施围产期焦虑的常规评估:案例研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-17. doi: 10.3310/WWMD9982.
10
A Psychometric Analysis of the Health Literate Health Care Organization-10 Item Questionnaire.健康素养医疗机构 10 项问卷的心理计量学分析。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2022 Apr;6(2):e137-e141. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20220518-01. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing burnout in the healthcare workforce: current realities and mitigation strategies.解决医疗保健人员的职业倦怠问题:当前现状与缓解策略。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Jun 11;42:100961. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100961. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Understanding nursing assessment of health literacy in a hospital context: A qualitative study.理解医院环境下的护理健康素养评估:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7495-7508. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16809. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Development and validation of the health literacy environment scale for Chinese hospitals from patients' perspective.
基于患者视角的中文版医院健康素养环境量表的编制及信效度检验。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1130628. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130628. eCollection 2023.
4
[Tools to strengthen organizational health literacy in the health care sector].[加强医疗保健部门组织健康素养的工具]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 May;170:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Organizational Health Literacy in a Hospital-Insights on the Patients' Perspective.医院组织健康素养——基于患者视角的洞察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 30;18(23):12646. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312646.
6
Which criteria characterize a health literate health care organization? - a scoping review on organizational health literacy.哪些标准可以体现一个有文化素养的医疗机构?——一个关于组织文化素养的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06604-z.
7
Original Research: Assessing Organizational Focus on Health Literacy in North Texas Hospitals.原始研究:评估北德克萨斯州医院对健康素养的组织关注。
Am J Nurs. 2020 Dec;120(12):24-33. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000723424.47838.4d.
8
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health.理解和应对健康素养作为健康的社会决定因素。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:159-173. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
9
Global publications on stigma between 1998-2018: A bibliometric analysis.全球 1998-2018 年污名化研究文献计量分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:363-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 11.
10
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.