• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用德尔菲法对日本儿童语言障碍的概念框架、最佳评估及支持措施进行问卷调查

Questionnaire survey on the conceptual framework, optimal evaluation, and support measures for children's language disorders in Japan using the Delphi method.

作者信息

Iwamura Kenji, Isaki Motohiro, Uchiyama Chizuko, Nomura Keiko, Tanimoto Ayumi, Kuroiwa Hajime, Kozono Machiko, Iwashita Yoshihiro, Iwamura Junko, Hyodo Masamitsu

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Kumamoto City Hospital Kumamoto City Kumamoto Japan.

Division of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science Kumamoto Health Science University Kumamoto City Kumamoto Japan.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Apr 14;8(3):763-774. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1055. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/lio2.1055
PMID:37342114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10278105/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compile the opinions of native Japanese speakers on the conceptual framework, optimal evaluation, and support measures for children with language disorders to devise materials on which a consensus can be formed.

DESIGN

A quantitative descriptive study using the Delphi method.

SETTING

Using the Delphi method, 43 clinicians with at least 15 years of experience working professionally with children's language disorders in Japan were surveyed three times via a web-based questionnaire. Thirty-nine items that were carefully selected by the working group were surveyed, and the agreement level was set to ≥80%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We investigated the following aspects related to developmental language disorder (DLD) among Japanese children: definition, core symptoms, evaluation of core symptoms, relationship with a second language, relationship with other related disorders, support systems, and information availability.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 qualified panel members were included in this study. Among the 39 items in the questionnaire, a high level of consensus (≥80%) from the responses of the participants was achieved for five items in Round 1, whereas no consensus (<50%) was achieved for seven items. After revising and integrating the questionnaires into 22 items, we conducted Rounds 2 and 3 and obtained high and medium levels of agreement in 20 items on disease concept, core symptoms, coexisting disorders, and manner of support of DLD in children.

CONCLUSION

Our results clarify the previously ambiguous image of DLD in Japan. Information-sharing strategies that connect professionals, patients, their families, and community members are required in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

目的

汇总以日语为母语者对于语言障碍儿童的概念框架、最佳评估及支持措施的意见,以制定能达成共识的材料。

设计

采用德尔菲法的定量描述性研究。

背景

运用德尔菲法,通过网络问卷对43名在日本从事儿童语言障碍专业工作至少15年的临床医生进行了三轮调查。对工作组精心挑选的39个项目进行了调查,将共识水平设定为≥80%。

主要观察指标

我们调查了与日本儿童发育性语言障碍(DLD)相关的以下方面:定义、核心症状、核心症状评估、与第二语言的关系、与其他相关障碍的关系、支持系统和信息可得性。

结果

本研究共纳入43名合格的小组成员。在问卷中的39个项目中,第一轮有5个项目获得了参与者的高度共识(≥80%),而有7个项目未达成共识(<50%)。在将问卷修订整合为22个项目后,我们进行了第二轮和第三轮调查,在儿童DLD的疾病概念、核心症状、共病情况及支持方式等20个项目上获得了高和中等程度的共识。

结论

我们的结果澄清了日本此前对DLD模糊的认识。未来需要连接专业人员、患者、其家属和社区成员的信息共享策略。

证据水平

5级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b564/10278105/1736a3ae83ca/LIO2-8-763-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b564/10278105/1736a3ae83ca/LIO2-8-763-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b564/10278105/1736a3ae83ca/LIO2-8-763-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Questionnaire survey on the conceptual framework, optimal evaluation, and support measures for children's language disorders in Japan using the Delphi method.运用德尔菲法对日本儿童语言障碍的概念框架、最佳评估及支持措施进行问卷调查
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Apr 14;8(3):763-774. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1055. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Development and appropriateness of a scoring method for International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities, and Health assessment in older patients with heart failure: a Delphi survey of expert panel in Japan.开发并评估适用于老年心力衰竭患者的国际功能、残疾和健康分类评估的评分方法:日本专家小组的 Delphi 调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 17;12(9):e060609. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060609.
3
UK speech and language therapists' assessment of children's expressive language, and functional impairment and impact, following the CATALISE publications.在CATALISE系列出版物发布之后,英国言语和语言治疗师对儿童表达性语言、功能损害及影响的评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1570-1587. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12883. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.CATALISE 研究第二阶段:多国多学科德尔菲共识研究语言发育问题:术语。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1068-1080. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12721. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
A Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study of Communicative Participation in Young Children With Language Disorders.一项关于语言障碍幼儿沟通参与的多学科德尔菲共识研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1793-1806. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00326. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Perspectives on Postural Control Dysfunction to Inform Future Research: A Delphi Study for Children With Cerebral Palsy.关于姿势控制功能障碍的观点以指导未来研究:一项针对脑瘫儿童的德尔菲研究
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;98(3):463-479. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
7
Cultural Adaptation of the Actionable Health App Evaluation in Japan: Protocol for a Web-Based Modified Delphi Expert Consensus Study.日本可操作的健康应用程序评估的文化适应性:基于网络的改良德尔菲专家共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 3;12:e44469. doi: 10.2196/44469.
8
Assessing agreement on Canadian pediatric critical care training objectives in Japan.评估日本对加拿大儿科重症监护培训目标的认同度。
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15363. doi: 10.1111/ped.15363.
9
Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.达成儿科姑息治疗结局测量优先事项共识:一项改良 Delphi 调查、与儿童研究参与小组的互动以及专家项目生成的结果。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
10
Three nested randomized controlled trials of peer-only or multiple stakeholder group feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development.在核心结局和信息集开发过程中,针对德尔菲调查中仅同行或多利益相关者群体反馈进行的三项嵌套随机对照试验。
Trials. 2016 Aug 17;17(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1479-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study of Communicative Participation in Young Children With Language Disorders.一项关于语言障碍幼儿沟通参与的多学科德尔菲共识研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1793-1806. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00326. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
2
Using the Delphi Technique to Explore Complex Concepts in Speech-Language Pathology: An Illustrative Example From Children's Social Communication.运用德尔菲法探索言语语言病理学中的复杂概念:儿童社会沟通的一个示例
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 8;26(4):1225-1235. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0046.
3
Why is it so hard to reach agreement on terminology? The case of developmental language disorder (DLD).
为什么在术语上达成一致如此困难?发育性语言障碍(DLD)的情况。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):671-680. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12335. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Tutorial: Speech Assessment for Multilingual Children Who Do Not Speak the Same Language(s) as the Speech-Language Pathologist.教程:针对母语与言语语言病理学家不同的多语言儿童的言语评估
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Aug 15;26(3):691-708. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-15-0161.
5
Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology.CATALISE 研究第二阶段:多国多学科德尔菲共识研究语言发育问题:术语。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1068-1080. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12721. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children.催化作用:一项多国多学科德尔菲共识研究。识别儿童语言障碍。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158753. eCollection 2016.
7
Protocol--realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: evolving standards (RAMESES).方案——现实主义和元叙述证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Aug 16;11:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-115.
8
Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.德尔菲调查技术的研究指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15.
9
[Clinical study on retarded development of speech].[言语发育迟缓的临床研究]
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1971 Aug;74(8):1271-303.