• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推特之声:从俄语推文推断出的可观察主观幸福感。

The voice of Twitter: observable subjective well-being inferred from tweets in Russian.

作者信息

Smetanin Sergey, Komarov Mikhail

机构信息

HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Dec 20;8:e1181. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1181. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.1181
PMID:37346309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10280187/
Abstract

As one of the major platforms of communication, social networks have become a valuable source of opinions and emotions. Considering that sharing of emotions offline and online is quite similar, historical posts from social networks seem to be a valuable source of data for measuring observable subjective well-being (OSWB). In this study, we calculated OSWB indices for the Russian-speaking segment of Twitter using the Affective Social Data Model for Socio-Technical Interactions. This model utilises demographic information and post-stratification techniques to make the data sample representative, by selected characteristics, of the general population of a country. For sentiment analysis, we fine-tuned RuRoBERTa-Large on RuSentiTweet and achieved new state-of-the-art results of = 0.7229. Several calculated OSWB indicators demonstrated moderate Spearman's correlation with the traditional survey-based net affect ( = 0.469 and = 0.5332, < 0.05) and positive affect ( = 0.5177 and = 0.548, < 0.05) indices in Russia.

摘要

作为主要的交流平台之一,社交网络已成为观点和情绪的宝贵来源。鉴于线下和线上的情绪分享颇为相似,社交网络上的历史帖子似乎是衡量可观察主观幸福感(OSWB)的宝贵数据来源。在本研究中,我们使用社会技术交互的情感社交数据模型计算了推特俄语区的OSWB指数。该模型利用人口统计信息和后分层技术,通过选定的特征使数据样本能够代表一个国家的普通人群。对于情感分析,我们在RuSentiTweet上对RuRoBERTa-Large进行了微调,并取得了新的最优结果,F1值 = 0.7229。在俄罗斯,几个计算得出的OSWB指标与传统的基于调查的净情感指数(rs = 0.469和rs = 0.5332,p < 0.05)以及积极情感指数(rs = 0.5177和rs = 0.548,p < 0.05)呈现出中等程度的斯皮尔曼相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/36d4067d5748/peerj-cs-08-1181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/2b2826f33c36/peerj-cs-08-1181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/f6dcf4b43438/peerj-cs-08-1181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/36d4067d5748/peerj-cs-08-1181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/2b2826f33c36/peerj-cs-08-1181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/f6dcf4b43438/peerj-cs-08-1181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c325/10280187/36d4067d5748/peerj-cs-08-1181-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The voice of Twitter: observable subjective well-being inferred from tweets in Russian.推特之声:从俄语推文推断出的可观察主观幸福感。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Dec 20;8:e1181. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1181. eCollection 2022.
2
RuSentiTweet: a sentiment analysis dataset of general domain tweets in Russian.RuSentiTweet:一个俄语通用领域推文的情感分析数据集。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Jul 19;8:e1039. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1039. eCollection 2022.
3
Identifying Sentiment of Hookah-Related Posts on Twitter.识别推特上与水烟相关帖子的情感倾向。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Oct 18;3(4):e74. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8133.
4
Topics and Sentiment Surrounding Vaping on Twitter and Reddit During the 2019 e-Cigarette and Vaping Use-Associated Lung Injury Outbreak: Comparative Study.主题和情绪围绕着 2019 年电子烟和蒸气相关肺损伤爆发期间 Twitter 和 Reddit 上的蒸气:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 13;24(12):e39460. doi: 10.2196/39460.
5
Identifying Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Twitter and Learning From Their Personal Experience: Retrospective Cohort Study.在 Twitter 上识别炎症性肠病患者并从他们的个人经验中学习:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 2;24(8):e29186. doi: 10.2196/29186.
6
Sentiment Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Models Using Twitter Data on Russia-Ukraine War.使用关于俄乌战争的推特数据对监督式机器学习模型进行情感分析与综合评估
SN Comput Sci. 2023;4(4):346. doi: 10.1007/s42979-023-01790-5. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
7
Using twitter to examine smoking behavior and perceptions of emerging tobacco products.利用推特研究吸烟行为及对新兴烟草产品的认知。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 29;15(8):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2534.
8
Applying Multiple Data Collection Tools to Quantify Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Communication on Twitter.应用多种数据收集工具量化推特上的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗传播情况
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 5;18(12):e318. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6670.
9
Online Influence and Sentiment of Fitness Tweets: Analysis of Two Million Fitness Tweets.健身推文的网络影响力与情感分析:两百万条健身推文剖析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Oct 31;3(4):e82. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8507.
10
"When 'Bad' is 'Good'": Identifying Personal Communication and Sentiment in Drug-Related Tweets.当“负面”即“正面”:识别与毒品相关推文中的个人交流和情感倾向
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016 Oct 24;2(2):e162. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6327.

本文引用的文献

1
RuSentiTweet: a sentiment analysis dataset of general domain tweets in Russian.RuSentiTweet:一个俄语通用领域推文的情感分析数据集。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Jul 19;8:e1039. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1039. eCollection 2022.
2
Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and social outcomes of the social sharing of emotion.情绪的社会分享的个体间、人际间和社会结果。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Feb;31:127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
Diurnal variations of psychometric indicators in Twitter content.推特内容中心理测量指标的昼夜变化。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0197002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197002. eCollection 2018.
4
Circadian mood variations in Twitter content.推特内容中的昼夜情绪变化。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2017 Jan 1;1:2398212817744501. doi: 10.1177/2398212817744501. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Multilingual Twitter Sentiment Classification: The Role of Human Annotators.多语言推特情感分类:人工标注者的作用。
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0155036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155036. eCollection 2016.
6
Who Tweets with Their Location? Understanding the Relationship between Demographic Characteristics and the Use of Geoservices and Geotagging on Twitter.哪些人会在推特上标注自己的位置?了解人口统计学特征与推特上地理服务和地理标签使用之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0142209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142209. eCollection 2015.
7
Dimensions of Subjective Well-Being.主观幸福感的维度
Soc Indic Res. 2015;123(3):625-660. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0753-0. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
8
The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures.主观幸福感测量的可靠性。
J Public Econ. 2008 Aug;92(8-9):1833-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015.
9
Subjective well-being measures: reliability and validity among Spanish elders.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;38(3):221-35. doi: 10.2190/MGGY-KFN3-M4YR-DFN4.