Suppr超能文献

2000年至2022年高影响力重症监护随机对照试验研究中第一作者和资深作者的性别与种族差异

Gender and racial differences in first and senior authorship of high-impact critical care randomized controlled trial studies from 2000 to 2022.

作者信息

Chander Subhash, Luhana Sindhu, Sadarat Fnu, Leys Lorenzo, Parkash Om, Kumari Roopa

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, 281 1st Ave, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Department of Medicine, AGA Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Jun 27;13(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01157-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Females and ethnic minorities are underrepresented in the first and senior authorships positions of academic publications. This stems from various structural and systemic inequalities and discrimination in the journal peer-review process, as well as educational, institutional, and organizational cultures.

METHODS

A retrospective bibliometric study design was used to investigate the representation of gender and racial/ethnic groups in the authorship of critical care randomized controlled trials in 12 high-impact journals from 2000 to 2022.

RESULTS

In the 1398 randomized controlled trials included in this study, only 24.61% of the first authors and 16.6% of the senior authors were female. Although female authorship increased during the study period, authorship was significantly higher for males throughout (Chi-square for trend, p < 0.0001). The educational attainment [χ(4) = 99.2, p < 0.0001] and the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ(42) = 70.3, p = 0.0029] were significantly associated with gender. Male authorship was significantly more prevalent in 10 out of 12 journals analyzed in this study [χ(11) = 110.1, p < 0.0001]. The most common race/ethnic group in our study population was White (85.1% women, 85.4% males), followed by Asians (14.3% females, 14.3% males). Although there was a significant increase in the number of non-White authors between 2000 and 2022 [χ(22) = 77.3, p < 0.0001], the trend was driven by an increase in non-White male and not non-White female authors. Race/ethnicity was significantly associated with the country of the author's affiliated institution [χ(41) = 1107, p < 0.0001] but not with gender or educational attainment.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent gender and racial disparities in high-impact medical and critical care journals underscore the need to revise policies and strategies to encourage greater diversity in critical care research.

摘要

背景

在学术出版物的第一作者和资深作者职位中,女性和少数族裔的代表性不足。这源于期刊同行评审过程中以及教育、机构和组织文化方面存在的各种结构性和系统性不平等及歧视。

方法

采用回顾性文献计量研究设计,调查2000年至2022年期间12种高影响力期刊上重症监护随机对照试验作者中性别和种族/族裔群体的代表性。

结果

在本研究纳入的1398项随机对照试验中,只有24.61%的第一作者和16.6%的资深作者为女性。尽管在研究期间女性作者比例有所增加,但总体上男性作者比例显著更高(趋势卡方检验,p < 0.0001)。教育程度[χ(4)=99.2,p < 0.0001]和作者所属机构所在国家[χ(42)=70.3,p = 0.0029]与性别显著相关。在本研究分析的12种期刊中,有10种期刊男性作者比例显著更高[χ(11)=110.1,p < 0.0001]。我们研究人群中最常见的种族/族裔群体是白人(女性占85.1%,男性占85.4%),其次是亚洲人(女性占14.3%,男性占14.3%)。尽管2000年至2022年期间非白人作者数量显著增加[χ(22)=77.3,p < 0.0001],但这一趋势是由非白人男性而非非白人女性作者数量增加推动的。种族/族裔与作者所属机构所在国家显著相关[χ(41)=1107,p < 0.0001],但与性别或教育程度无关。

结论

高影响力医学和重症监护期刊中持续存在的性别和种族差异凸显了修订政策和策略以鼓励重症监护研究中实现更大多样性的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4890/10299980/af1d82f6eb97/13613_2023_1157_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验