From the Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Dec 1;95(6):969-974. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004011. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
Interfacility transfer of emergency general surgery (EGS) patients continues to rise, especially in the context of ongoing system consolidation. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize the literature on triage, timing, and mode of interfacility emergency general surgery transfer. While common, EGS transfer systems are not optimized to improve outcomes or ensure value-based care. We identified studies investigating emergency general surgery interfacility transfer using Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library between 1990 and 2022. English studies that evaluated EGS interfacility timing, triage or transfer mode were included. Studies were assessed by two independent reviewers. Studies were limited to English-language articles in the United States. Data were extracted and summarized with a narrative synthesis of the results and gaps in the literature. There were 423 articles identified, of which 66 underwent full-text review after meeting inclusion criteria. Most publications were descriptive studies or outcomes investigations of interfacility transfer. Only six articles described issues related to the logistics behind the interfacility transfer and were included. The articles were grouped into the predefined themes of transfer timing, triage, and mode of transfer. There were mixed results for the impact of transfer timing on outcomes with heterogeneous definitions of delay and populations. Triage guidelines for EGS transfer were consensus or expert opinion. No studies were identified addressing the mode of interfacility EGS transfer. Further research should focus on better understanding which populations of patients require expedited transfer and by what mode. The lack of high-level data supports the need for robust investigations into interfacility transfer processes to optimize triage using scarce resources and optimized value-based care.
医疗机构间的急诊普通外科(EGS)患者转院持续增加,尤其是在系统不断整合的背景下。本次范围综述旨在确定和总结有关 EGS 患者分诊、时机和转院方式的文献。虽然常见,但 EGS 转院系统并未优化以改善结果或确保基于价值的护理。我们使用 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 从 1990 年至 2022 年检索了关于急诊普通外科医疗机构间转院的研究。纳入评估 EGS 医疗机构间时机、分诊或转院方式的英文研究。由两名独立评审员评估研究。研究仅限于美国的英语文章。提取数据并对文献中的结果和差距进行叙述性综合总结。共确定了 423 篇文章,其中 66 篇在符合纳入标准后进行了全文审查。大多数出版物是描述性研究或医疗机构间转院的结果调查。只有六篇文章描述了与医疗机构间转院背后的后勤相关的问题,并被纳入。文章分为转院时机、分诊和转院方式的预设主题。转院时机对结局的影响存在混合结果,延迟和人群的定义存在异质性。EGS 转院的分诊指南是共识或专家意见。没有发现研究解决 EGS 转院方式的问题。进一步的研究应侧重于更好地了解需要紧急转院的患者人群以及通过何种方式。缺乏高级别数据支持对医疗机构间转院流程进行深入调查的必要性,以利用稀缺资源优化分诊,并优化基于价值的护理。