Seo Hyun-Ju, Kim Soo Young, Lee Yoon Jae, Park Ji-Eun
College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Fam Med. 2023 Sep;44(5):249-260. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0034. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
Assessment of the risk of bias is an essential component of any systematic review. This is true for both nonrandomized studies and randomized trials, which are the main study designs of systematic reviews. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies (RoBANS) was developed in 2013 and has gained wide usage as a risk-of-bias assessment tool for nonrandomized studies. Four risk-of-bias assessment experts revised it by reviewing existing assessment tools and user surveys. The main modifications included additional domains of selection and detection bias susceptible to nonrandomized studies of interventions, a more detailed consideration of the comparability of participants, and more reliable and valid outcome measurements. A psychometric assessment of the revised RoBANS (RoBANS 2) revealed acceptable inter-rater reliability (weighted kappa, 0.25 to 0.49) and construct validity in which intervention effects of studies with an unclear or high risk of bias were overestimated. The RoBANS 2 has acceptable feasibility, fair-to-moderate reliability, and construct validity. It provides a comprehensive framework for allowing authors to assess and understand the plausible risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions.
偏倚风险评估是任何系统评价的重要组成部分。对于非随机研究和随机试验来说都是如此,这两种研究是系统评价的主要研究设计类型。非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具(RoBANS)于2013年开发,并作为非随机研究的偏倚风险评估工具得到了广泛应用。四位偏倚风险评估专家通过回顾现有的评估工具和用户调查对其进行了修订。主要修改内容包括针对干预措施的非随机研究易出现的选择偏倚和检测偏倚增加了额外的领域,对参与者的可比性进行了更详细的考量,以及采用了更可靠、有效的结局测量方法。对修订后的RoBANS(RoBANS 2)进行的心理测量评估显示,其具有可接受的评分者间信度(加权kappa系数为0.25至0.49)以及结构效度,其中偏倚风险不明确或高风险研究的干预效应被高估。RoBANS 2具有可接受的可行性、中等偏下的信度和结构效度。它为作者评估和理解干预措施非随机研究中可能存在的偏倚风险提供了一个全面的框架。