• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于智能手机的人工智能应用对黑色素瘤、黑素细胞痣和脂溢性角化病进行分类的准确性。

Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Application for Classification of Melanomas, Melanocytic Nevi, and Seborrheic Keratoses.

作者信息

Liutkus Jokubas, Kriukas Arturas, Stragyte Dominyka, Mazeika Erikas, Raudonis Vidas, Galetzka Wolfgang, Stang Andreas, Valiukeviciene Skaidra

机构信息

Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.

Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(13):2139. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132139.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13132139
PMID:37443533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10340832/
Abstract

Current artificial intelligence algorithms can classify melanomas at a level equivalent to that of experienced dermatologists. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of a smartphone-based "You Only Look Once" neural network model for the classification of melanomas, melanocytic nevi, and seborrheic keratoses. The algorithm was trained using 59,090 dermatoscopic images. Testing was performed on histologically confirmed lesions: 32 melanomas, 35 melanocytic nevi, and 33 seborrheic keratoses. The results of the algorithm's decisions were compared with those of two skilled dermatologists and five beginners in dermatoscopy. The algorithm's sensitivity and specificity for melanomas were 0.88 (0.71-0.96) and 0.87 (0.76-0.94), respectively. The algorithm surpassed the beginner dermatologists, who achieved a sensitivity of 0.83 (0.77-0.87). For melanocytic nevi, the algorithm outclassed each group of dermatologists, attaining a sensitivity of 0.77 (0.60-0.90). The algorithm's sensitivity for seborrheic keratoses was 0.52 (0.34-0.69). The smartphone-based "You Only Look Once" neural network model achieved a high sensitivity and specificity in the classification of melanomas and melanocytic nevi with an accuracy similar to that of skilled dermatologists. However, a bigger dataset is required in order to increase the algorithm's sensitivity for seborrheic keratoses.

摘要

当前的人工智能算法在对黑色素瘤进行分类时,其水平与经验丰富的皮肤科医生相当。本研究的目的是评估基于智能手机的“你只看一次”神经网络模型对黑色素瘤、黑素细胞痣和脂溢性角化病进行分类的准确性。该算法使用59,090张皮肤镜图像进行训练。对经组织学确诊的病变进行测试:32例黑色素瘤、35例黑素细胞痣和33例脂溢性角化病。将该算法的诊断结果与两位经验丰富的皮肤科医生和五位皮肤科新手的诊断结果进行比较。该算法对黑色素瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为0.88(0.71 - 0.96)和0.87(0.76 - 0.94)。该算法超过了皮肤科新手,他们的敏感性为0.83(0.77 - 0.87)。对于黑素细胞痣,该算法优于每组皮肤科医生,敏感性达到0.77(0.60 - 0.90)。该算法对脂溢性角化病的敏感性为0.52(0.34 - 0.69)。基于智能手机的“你只看一次”神经网络模型在黑色素瘤和黑素细胞痣的分类中实现了高敏感性和特异性,其准确性与经验丰富的皮肤科医生相似。然而,需要更大的数据集来提高该算法对脂溢性角化病的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/49032ffd4eef/diagnostics-13-02139-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/7811859695ec/diagnostics-13-02139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/181d0d6a9457/diagnostics-13-02139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/7d68f433c41f/diagnostics-13-02139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/8346443db4a1/diagnostics-13-02139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/07df84557a8b/diagnostics-13-02139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/49032ffd4eef/diagnostics-13-02139-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/7811859695ec/diagnostics-13-02139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/181d0d6a9457/diagnostics-13-02139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/7d68f433c41f/diagnostics-13-02139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/8346443db4a1/diagnostics-13-02139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/07df84557a8b/diagnostics-13-02139-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b97/10340832/49032ffd4eef/diagnostics-13-02139-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Application for Classification of Melanomas, Melanocytic Nevi, and Seborrheic Keratoses.一种基于智能手机的人工智能应用对黑色素瘤、黑素细胞痣和脂溢性角化病进行分类的准确性。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(13):2139. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132139.
2
The diagnostic yield of histologic examination of seborrheic keratoses.脂溢性角化病组织学检查的诊断率
Arch Dermatol. 1997 Nov;133(11):1417-20.
3
The influence of painful sunburns and lifetime sun exposure on the risk of actinic keratoses, seborrheic warts, melanocytic nevi, atypical nevi, and skin cancer.晒伤疼痛和终生阳光暴露对光化性角化病、脂溢性疣、黑素细胞痣、非典型痣及皮肤癌风险的影响。
J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Jun;120(6):1087-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12246.x.
4
Computer algorithms show potential for improving dermatologists' accuracy to diagnose cutaneous melanoma: Results of the International Skin Imaging Collaboration 2017.计算机算法显示出提高皮肤科医生诊断皮肤黑色素瘤准确性的潜力:国际皮肤成像协作 2017 年的研究结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Mar;82(3):622-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.体内反射共聚焦显微镜在黑素细胞性病变分析中的作用
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):64-67.
6
Assessment of Diagnostic Performance of Dermatologists Cooperating With a Convolutional Neural Network in a Prospective Clinical Study: Human With Machine.皮肤科医生与卷积神经网络合作的诊断性能评估:人机协作。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0905.
7
Histologic Screening of Malignant Melanoma, Spitz, Dermal and Junctional Melanocytic Nevi Using a Deep Learning Model.利用深度学习模型进行恶性黑色素瘤、Spitz 痣、真皮和交界性黑素细胞痣的组织学筛查。
Am J Dermatopathol. 2022 Sep 1;44(9):650-657. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000002232. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Melanomas vs. nevi in high-risk patients under long-term monitoring with digital dermatoscopy: do melanomas and nevi already differ at baseline?长期数字皮肤镜监测下高危患者黑色素瘤与痣的比较:黑色素瘤和痣在基线时就已存在差异吗?
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Jun;31(6):972-977. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14065. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Artificial Intelligence and Its Effect on Dermatologists' Accuracy in Dermoscopic Melanoma Image Classification: Web-Based Survey Study.人工智能及其对皮肤科医生在皮肤镜黑色素瘤图像分类中准确性的影响:基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 11;22(9):e18091. doi: 10.2196/18091.
10
Differentiation of melanoma from benign mimics using the relative-color method.利用相对颜色法鉴别黑素瘤与良性肿瘤。
Skin Res Technol. 2010 Aug;16(3):297-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00429.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning Multi-Modal Melanoma Detection: Algorithm Development and Validation.深度学习多模态黑色素瘤检测:算法开发与验证
JMIR AI. 2025 Aug 13;4:e66561. doi: 10.2196/66561.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel Optical Imaging Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于黑色素瘤检测的新型光学成像技术的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Dermatol. 2025 Oct;64(10):1813-1824. doi: 10.1111/ijd.17828. Epub 2025 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wild.BCN20000:野外的皮肤镜病变。
Sci Data. 2024 Jun 17;11(1):641. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03387-w.
2
Assessment of Diagnostic Performance of Dermatologists Cooperating With a Convolutional Neural Network in a Prospective Clinical Study: Human With Machine.皮肤科医生与卷积神经网络合作的诊断性能评估:人机协作。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):621-627. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0905.
3
A deep learning-based hybrid artificial intelligence model for the detection and severity assessment of vitiligo lesions.
一种基于深度学习的混合人工智能模型,用于白癜风皮损的检测和严重程度评估。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 May;10(10):590. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1738.
4
European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022.欧洲基于共识的多学科黑色素瘤指南。第 1 部分:诊断:2022 年更新。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jul;170:236-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
Validation of artificial intelligence prediction models for skin cancer diagnosis using dermoscopy images: the 2019 International Skin Imaging Collaboration Grand Challenge.基于皮肤镜图像的皮肤癌诊断人工智能预测模型验证:2019 年国际皮肤成像协作挑战赛。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e330-e339. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00021-8.
6
Global Burden of Cutaneous Melanoma in 2020 and Projections to 2040.2020 年全球皮肤黑色素瘤负担及 2040 年预测。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):495-503. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0160.
7
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Skin Cancer Classification from Dermoscopic Images.用于从皮肤镜图像进行皮肤癌分类的机器学习和深度学习算法
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Feb 27;9(3):97. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030097.
8
Dermoscopy use in primary care: a qualitative study with general practitioners.皮肤镜在基层医疗中的应用:一项针对全科医生的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Mar 15;23(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01653-7.
9
Validation of a Market-Approved Artificial Intelligence Mobile Health App for Skin Cancer Screening: A Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study.一种市售人工智能移动健康应用程序用于皮肤癌筛查的验证:一项前瞻性多中心诊断准确性研究。
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):649-656. doi: 10.1159/000520474. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
Skin cancer classification via convolutional neural networks: systematic review of studies involving human experts.基于卷积神经网络的皮肤癌分类:涉及人类专家的研究的系统综述。
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Oct;156:202-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.049. Epub 2021 Sep 8.