• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计地方层面的卫生战略:地方政府的概念框架。

Designing a Health Strategy at Local Level: A Conceptual Framework for Local Governments.

机构信息

GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

IEETA, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 29;20(13):6250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136250.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20136250
PMID:37444098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10341049/
Abstract

This article addresses a gap in the literature regarding the design and implementation of health and well-being strategies by local governments. It presents a conceptual framework that can help local governments to include health and well-being among their political priorities by promoting the participation of local stakeholders and the community in general. The article also highlights the important role that local governments play in public health, especially in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. To demonstrate the approach, the manuscript explores the recent shift toward decentralization in Portugal and the resulting emphasis on local governments leading new approaches to health governance. The planning process for Arouca's Health Strategy, an inland municipality, is used as a case study to demonstrate the approach, which emphasizes the meaningful participation of the entire local community. The article concludes by noting that there is still significant room for improvement in all areas related to health and well-being and a need to adopt new multistakeholder governance arrangements to sustain the institutional capacity for upcoming strategies.

摘要

这篇文章针对地方政府在设计和实施健康和福祉策略方面的文献空白提出了一个概念框架,通过促进地方利益相关者和整个社区的参与,可以帮助地方政府将健康和福祉纳入其政治优先事项。文章还强调了地方政府在公共卫生方面的重要作用,特别是在 COVID-19 大流行等危机时期。为了演示这种方法,本文探讨了葡萄牙最近向权力下放的转变,以及由此对地方政府主导新的健康治理方法的重视。阿罗卡健康战略的规划过程被用作案例研究,以展示该方法,该方法强调整个当地社区的有意义参与。文章最后指出,在与健康和福祉相关的所有领域仍有很大的改进空间,需要采取新的多方利益相关者治理安排,以维持即将到来的战略的机构能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/83682eac4feb/ijerph-20-06250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/fb24641b918e/ijerph-20-06250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/9208afe6694a/ijerph-20-06250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/04cc9bed5613/ijerph-20-06250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/9f69a6c8b57d/ijerph-20-06250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/4d2248d0b66d/ijerph-20-06250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/83682eac4feb/ijerph-20-06250-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/fb24641b918e/ijerph-20-06250-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/9208afe6694a/ijerph-20-06250-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/04cc9bed5613/ijerph-20-06250-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/9f69a6c8b57d/ijerph-20-06250-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/4d2248d0b66d/ijerph-20-06250-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1b4/10341049/83682eac4feb/ijerph-20-06250-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Designing a Health Strategy at Local Level: A Conceptual Framework for Local Governments.设计地方层面的卫生战略:地方政府的概念框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 29;20(13):6250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136250.
2
What accounts for the different regional responses to COVID-19 in China? Exploring the role of institutional environment, governance capacity and legitimacy.中国各地区对 COVID-19 为何会有不同的反应?探究制度环境、治理能力和合法性的作用。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Apr 11;38(4):552-566. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad007.
3
Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp.评估安特卫普市应对 COVID-19 危机的城市治理研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19569-5.
4
[Doing, planning, "planning-doing:" a case of municipal pragmatism in collaboration with a university during the COVID-19 pandemic].[行动、规划、“规划-行动”:新冠疫情期间一个城市与一所大学合作的实用主义案例]
Salud Colect. 2021 May 28;17:e3341. doi: 10.18294/sc.2021.3341.
5
How Preemption Can Lead to Inequity.先发制人如何导致不平等。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;19(17):10476. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710476.
6
Examining COVID-19 response among local governments through the political market framework.通过政治市场框架审视地方政府对新冠疫情的应对措施。
J Emerg Manag. 2023;21(7):111-131. doi: 10.5055/jem.0755.
7
Centralizing and decentralizing governance in the COVID-19 pandemic: The politics of credit and blame.在 COVID-19 大流行中集中和分散治理:信用和责任的政治。
Health Policy. 2022 May;126(5):408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
8
Toward better pandemic governance and preparedness: South Korea's whole-of-nation approach to COVID-19.迈向更好的大流行治理和防范:韩国应对 COVID-19 的全民方法。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2126. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19655-8.
9
Contested leadership and the governance of COVID-19 in Brazil: The role of local government and community activism.巴西 COVID-19 疫情中的领导权之争与治理:地方政府和社区行动主义的作用。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr;17(4):483-495. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2028304. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
Decentralization and health system performance - a focused review of dimensions, difficulties, and derivatives in India.权力下放与卫生系统绩效——对印度的维度、困难及衍生问题的重点综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 6):561. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1784-9.

引用本文的文献

1
How an urban regeneration programme impact people's health and wellbeing: an evaluation from citizen's perception using concept mapping.城市更新项目如何影响人们的健康和福祉:基于概念映射法的市民认知评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21827-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Making Sense of the Complexity of Decentralised Governance Comment on "The Effects of Health Sector Fiscal Decentralisation on Availability, Accessibility, and Utilisation of Healthcare Services: A Panel Data Analysis".解析分散治理的复杂性 评“卫生部门财政分权对医疗服务提供、可及性和利用的影响:面板数据分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7449. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7449. Epub 2023 Jan 1.
2
Our Healthy Community Conceptual Framework and Intervention Model for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Municipalities.我们的健康社区概念框架和干预模型,用于促进城市健康和预防疾病。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3901. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053901.
3
A Critical Analysis of Decentralizing the Portuguese Public Healthcare Provision Services.
去中心化的葡萄牙公共医疗服务提供之批判分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 17;19(20):13390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013390.
4
Decentralization Can Improve Equity, but Can It Be Sustained?去中心化可以提高公平性,但它能持续吗?
Health Syst Reform. 2022 Jan 1;8(1):e2064793. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2022.2064793.
5
State of evidence on municipal strategies for health promotion and prevention: a literature and database research (Scoping Review).城市健康促进与预防策略的证据状况:一项文献与数据库研究(范围综述)
BMC Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12607-0.
6
An Analysis of Government Communication in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Effective Government Health Risk Communication.新冠疫情期间美国政府沟通分析:有效政府健康风险沟通的建议
World Med Health Policy. 2020 Dec;12(4):398-412. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.363. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
Examining Social Determinants of Health, Stigma, and COVID-19 Disparities.审视健康的社会决定因素、耻辱感与新冠疫情差异
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 12;8(2):168. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020168.
8
The impacts of decentralization on health system equity, efficiency and resilience: a realist synthesis of the evidence.去中心化对卫生系统公平性、效率和弹性的影响:证据的现实主义综合。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):605-617. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz055.
9
Does Decentralization Improve Health System Performance and Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review of Evidence From Quantitative Studies.去中心化是否能提高中低收入国家的卫生系统绩效和结果?来自定量研究的证据的系统评价。
Milbank Q. 2018 Jun;96(2):323-368. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12327.
10
Politics, policies and processes: a multidisciplinary and multimethods research programme on policies on the social determinants of health inequity in Australia.政治、政策与流程:澳大利亚社会决定因素健康不公平政策的多学科、多方法研究计划。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e017772. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017772.