Department of General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Forsthausweg 2, 47057, Duisburg, Germany.
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 23;13(1):11895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39042-4.
Social networks are frequently used to distract, procrastinate, or cope with stress. We aimed to investigate how (problematic) social-networks use affect stress perception in interaction with different stress recovery conditions. A total of 104 participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Three groups underwent a stress induction with subsequent stress recovery via (1) using Facebook, (2) reading magazines, or (3) waiting. Another group (4) waited without stress induction. Stress perception was repeatedly assessed with the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory. Facebook use and reading magazines decreased acute stress indicating adaptive coping strategies. Stress-recovery conditions and symptom severity showed significant interactions. Facebook use was not effective for individuals with high symptom severity in contrast to non-digital strategies or for individuals with low symptom severity. The usage of social networks may be an adaptive strategy for coping with stress for some people, it is maladaptive for individuals having a problematic usage.
社交网络经常被用于分散注意力、拖延或应对压力。我们旨在研究(有问题的)社交网络使用如何在与不同的压力恢复条件相互作用的情况下影响压力感知。共有 104 名参与者被随机分配到四个组之一。三组通过以下方式进行压力诱导和随后的压力恢复:(1)使用 Facebook,(2)阅读杂志,或(3)等待。另一组(4)不进行压力诱导而等待。使用状态-特质焦虑量表反复评估压力感知。使用 Facebook 和阅读杂志可以减轻急性压力,表明采用了适应性应对策略。压力恢复条件和症状严重程度显示出显著的相互作用。对于症状严重程度高的个体,使用 Facebook 没有效果,而对于非数字策略或症状严重程度低的个体则有效果。使用社交网络可能是某些人应对压力的适应性策略,但对于有问题使用习惯的个体来说,则是不适应的。