Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Jan;49(1):104-118. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01666-5. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Recent clinical and preclinical evidence suggests that psychedelics and entactogens may produce both rapid and sustained therapeutic effects across several indications. Currently, there is a disconnect between how these compounds are used in the clinic and how they are studied in preclinical species, which has led to a gap in our mechanistic understanding of how these compounds might positively impact mental health. Human studies have emphasized extra-pharmacological factors that could modulate psychedelic-induced therapeutic responses including set, setting, and integration-factors that are poorly modelled in current animal experiments. In contrast, animal studies have focused on changes in neuronal activation and structural plasticity-outcomes that are challenging to measure in humans. Here, we describe several hypotheses that might explain how psychedelics rescue neuropsychiatric disease symptoms, and we propose ways to bridge the gap between human and rodent studies. Given the diverse pharmacological profiles of psychedelics and entactogens, we suggest that their rapid and sustained therapeutic mechanisms of action might best be described by the collection of circuits that they modulate rather than their actions at any single molecular target. Thus, approaches focusing on selective circuit modulation of behavioral phenotypes might prove more fruitful than target-based methods for identifying novel compounds with rapid and sustained therapeutic effects similar to psychedelics and entactogens.
最近的临床和临床前证据表明,迷幻剂和快感增强剂可能在多种适应症中产生快速和持续的治疗效果。目前,这些化合物在临床上的使用方式与在临床前物种中的研究方式之间存在脱节,这导致我们对这些化合物如何可能对心理健康产生积极影响的机制理解存在差距。人类研究强调了可能调节迷幻剂诱导的治疗反应的药理学以外的因素,包括设置、环境和整合——这些因素在当前的动物实验中很难模拟。相比之下,动物研究侧重于神经元激活和结构可塑性的变化——这些结果在人类中难以测量。在这里,我们描述了几个可能解释迷幻剂如何挽救神经精神疾病症状的假设,并提出了在人类和啮齿动物研究之间架起桥梁的方法。鉴于迷幻剂和快感增强剂的药理学特征多种多样,我们认为它们快速和持续的治疗作用机制最好通过它们调节的电路集合来描述,而不是它们在任何单一分子靶点上的作用。因此,专注于行为表型的选择性电路调节的方法可能比基于靶标的方法更有成效,后者用于识别具有类似于迷幻剂和快感增强剂的快速和持续治疗效果的新型化合物。