Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7865-7873. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001952. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
Blood biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) may allow for the early detection of AD pathology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (MCI-AD) and as a co-pathology in MCI with Lewy bodies (MCI-LB). However not all cases of MCI-LB will feature AD pathology. Disease-general biomarkers of neurodegeneration, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) or neurofilament light (NfL), may therefore provide a useful supplement to AD biomarkers. We aimed to compare the relative utility of plasma A42/40, -tau181, GFAP and NfL in differentiating MCI-AD and MCI-LB from cognitively healthy older adults, and from one another.
Plasma samples were analysed for 172 participants (31 healthy controls, 48 MCI-AD, 28 possible MCI-LB and 65 probable MCI-LB) at baseline, and a subset ( = 55) who provided repeated samples after ≥1 year. Samples were analysed with a Simoa 4-plex assay for A42, A40, GFAP and NfL, and incorporated previously-collected -tau181 from this same cohort.
Probable MCI-LB had elevated GFAP ( < 0.001) and NfL ( = 0.012) relative to controls, but not significantly lower A42/40 ( = 0.06). GFAP and -tau181 were higher in MCI-AD than MCI-LB. GFAP discriminated all MCI subgroups, from controls (AUC of 0.75), but no plasma-based marker effectively differentiated MCI-AD from MCI-LB. NfL correlated with disease severity and increased with MCI progression over time ( = 0.011).
Markers of AD and astrocytosis/neurodegeneration are elevated in MCI-LB. GFAP offered similar utility to -tau181 in distinguishing MCI overall, and its subgroups, from healthy controls.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的血液生物标志物可能允许在轻度认知障碍(MCI)中由于 AD(MCI-AD)和在具有路易体(MCI-LB)的 MCI 中作为共病理学来早期检测 AD 病理学。然而,并非所有 MCI-LB 病例都会出现 AD 病理学。神经退行性疾病的一般生物标志物,如神经胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)或神经丝轻链(NfL),因此可能为 AD 生物标志物提供有用的补充。我们旨在比较血浆 A42/40、-tau181、GFAP 和 NfL 在区分 MCI-AD 和 MCI-LB 与认知健康老年人以及彼此之间的相对效用。
在基线时分析了来自 172 名参与者(31 名健康对照、48 名 MCI-AD、28 名可能的 MCI-LB 和 65 名可能的 MCI-LB)的血浆样本,并且一组(= 55)在 ≥1 年后提供了重复样本。使用 Simoa 4 plex 测定法分析了 A42、A40、GFAP 和 NfL,并纳入了来自同一队列的先前收集的 -tau181。
与对照组相比,可能的 MCI-LB 的 GFAP(<0.001)和 NfL(=0.012)升高,但 A42/40 没有显著降低(=0.06)。MCI-AD 中的 GFAP 和 -tau181 高于 MCI-LB。GFAP 可区分所有 MCI 亚组,与对照组(AUC 为 0.75),但没有基于血浆的标志物可有效区分 MCI-AD 与 MCI-LB。NfL 与疾病严重程度相关,并随着时间的推移随 MCI 进展而增加(=0.011)。
AD 和星形胶质细胞/神经退行性变的标志物在 MCI-LB 中升高。GFAP 在区分 MCI 整体及其亚组与健康对照组方面与 -tau181 具有相似的效用。