Kaniewska Malwina, Deininger-Czermak Eva, Lohezic Maelene, Ensle Falko, Guggenberger Roman
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Zurich (UZH), Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(14):2438. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142438.
To assess diagnostic performance of standard radial k-space (PROPELLER) MRI sequences and compare with accelerated acquisitions combined with a deep learning-based convolutional neural network (DL-CNN) reconstruction for evaluation of the knee joint.
Thirty-five patients undergoing MR imaging of the knee at 1.5 T were prospectively included. Two readers evaluated image quality and diagnostic confidence of standard and DL-CNN accelerated PROPELLER MR sequences using a four-point Likert scale. Pathological findings of bone, cartilage, cruciate and collateral ligaments, menisci, and joint space were analyzed. Inter-reader agreement (IRA) for image quality and diagnostic confidence was assessed using intraclass coefficients (ICC). Cohen's Kappa method was used for evaluation of IRA and consensus between sequences in assessing different structures. In addition, image quality was quantitatively evaluated by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements.
Mean acquisition time of standard vs. DL-CNN sequences was 10 min 3 s vs. 4 min 45 s. DL-CNN sequences showed significantly superior image quality and diagnostic confidence compared to standard MR sequences. There was moderate and good IRA for assessment of image quality in standard and DL-CNN sequences with ICC of 0.524 and 0.830, respectively. Pathological findings of the knee joint could be equally well detected in both sequences (κ-value of 0.8). Retropatellar cartilage could be significantly better assessed on DL-CNN sequences. SNR and CNR was significantly higher for DL-CNN sequences (both < 0.05).
In MR imaging of the knee, DL-CNN sequences showed significantly higher image quality and diagnostic confidence compared to standard PROPELLER sequences, while reducing acquisition time substantially. Both sequences perform comparably in the detection of knee-joint pathologies, while DL-CNN sequences are superior for evaluation of retropatellar cartilage lesions.
评估标准径向k空间(螺旋桨)MRI序列的诊断性能,并与结合基于深度学习的卷积神经网络(DL-CNN)重建的加速采集方法进行比较,以用于膝关节评估。
前瞻性纳入35例接受1.5T膝关节MR成像的患者。两名阅片者使用四点李克特量表评估标准和DL-CNN加速螺旋桨MR序列的图像质量和诊断信心。分析骨、软骨、交叉韧带和侧副韧带、半月板和关节间隙的病理结果。使用组内系数(ICC)评估阅片者之间在图像质量和诊断信心方面的一致性(IRA)。采用Cohen's Kappa方法评估IRA以及序列之间在评估不同结构时的一致性。此外,通过信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)测量对图像质量进行定量评估。
标准序列与DL-CNN序列的平均采集时间分别为10分3秒和4分45秒。与标准MR序列相比,DL-CNN序列显示出明显更好的图像质量和诊断信心。标准序列和DL-CNN序列在评估图像质量方面的IRA为中等和良好,ICC分别为0.524和0.830。两种序列对膝关节病理结果的检测效果相当(κ值为0.8)。在DL-CNN序列上对髌后软骨的评估明显更好。DL-CNN序列的SNR和CNR显著更高(均P<0.05)。
在膝关节MR成像中,与标准螺旋桨序列相比,DL-CNN序列显示出明显更高的图像质量和诊断信心,同时大幅缩短了采集时间。两种序列在检测膝关节病变方面表现相当,而DL-CNN序列在评估髌后软骨病变方面更具优势。