• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰家庭单元内和基因分型阵列间的遗传祖先估计:使用两种估计方法进行实证分析的见解。

Genetic Ancestry Estimates within Dutch Family Units and Across Genotyping Arrays: Insights from Empirical Analysis Using Two Estimation Methods.

机构信息

Avera Institute for Human Genetics, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57105, USA.

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Genes (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;14(7):1497. doi: 10.3390/genes14071497.

DOI:10.3390/genes14071497
PMID:37510400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10379078/
Abstract

Accurate inference of genetic ancestry is crucial for population-based association studies, accounting for population heterogeneity and structure. This study analyzes genome-wide SNP data from the Netherlands Twin Register to compare genetic ancestry estimates. The focus is on the comparison of ancestry estimates between family members and individuals genotyped on multiple arrays (Affymetrix 6.0, Affymetrix Axiom, and Illumina GSA). Two conventional methods, principal component analysis and ADMIXTURE, were implemented to estimate ancestry, each serving its specific purpose, rather than for direct comparison. The results reveal that as the degree of genetic relatedness decreases, the Euclidean distances of genetic ancestry estimates between family members significantly increase (empirical < 0.001), regardless of the estimation method and genotyping array. Ancestry estimates among individuals genotyped on multiple arrays also show statistically significant differences (empirical < 0.001). Additionally, this study investigates the relationship between the ancestry estimates of non-identical twin offspring with ancestrally diverse parents and those with ancestrally similar parents. The results indicate a statistically significant weak correlation between the variation in ancestry estimates among offspring and differences in ancestry estimates among parents (Spearman's rho: 0.07, = 0.005). This study highlights the utility of current methods in inferring genetic ancestry, emphasizing the importance of reference population composition in determining ancestry estimates.

摘要

准确推断遗传血统对于基于人群的关联研究至关重要,因为它可以解释人群异质性和结构。本研究分析了荷兰双胞胎登记处的全基因组 SNP 数据,以比较遗传血统估计值。研究重点是比较家庭成员和在多个数组(Affymetrix 6.0、Affymetrix Axiom 和 Illumina GSA)上进行基因分型的个体之间的血统估计值。本研究使用了两种传统方法,即主成分分析和 ADMIXTURE,来估计血统,这两种方法各有其特定用途,而不是直接进行比较。结果表明,随着遗传相关性的降低,家庭成员之间遗传血统估计值的欧几里得距离显著增加(经验 < 0.001),无论使用哪种估计方法和基因分型数组。在多个数组上进行基因分型的个体之间的血统估计值也存在统计学上的显著差异(经验 < 0.001)。此外,本研究还调查了具有不同祖先背景的父母和具有相似祖先背景的父母的非双胞胎后代的血统估计值之间的关系。结果表明,后代之间血统估计值的变化与父母之间血统估计值的差异之间存在统计学上的弱相关性(Spearman 的 rho:0.07, = 0.005)。本研究强调了当前方法在推断遗传血统方面的实用性,并强调了参考人群组成在确定血统估计值方面的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/0ab5827d6039/genes-14-01497-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/927723587f74/genes-14-01497-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/b5f0172c60f4/genes-14-01497-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/f62d34888223/genes-14-01497-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/0ab5827d6039/genes-14-01497-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/927723587f74/genes-14-01497-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/b5f0172c60f4/genes-14-01497-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/f62d34888223/genes-14-01497-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b016/10379078/0ab5827d6039/genes-14-01497-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Genetic Ancestry Estimates within Dutch Family Units and Across Genotyping Arrays: Insights from Empirical Analysis Using Two Estimation Methods.荷兰家庭单元内和基因分型阵列间的遗传祖先估计:使用两种估计方法进行实证分析的见解。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jul 22;14(7):1497. doi: 10.3390/genes14071497.
2
Genetic Similarity Assessment of Twin-Family Populations by Custom-Designed Genotyping Array.通过定制基因分型阵列评估双生子家庭群体的遗传相似性
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2019 Aug;22(4):210-219. doi: 10.1017/thg.2019.41. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
Robust inference of population structure for ancestry prediction and correction of stratification in the presence of relatedness.在存在亲缘关系的情况下,对群体结构进行稳健推断,以进行血统预测和分层校正。
Genet Epidemiol. 2015 May;39(4):276-93. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21896. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
4
Rapid assessment of genetic ancestry in populations of unknown origin by genome-wide genotyping of pooled samples.利用混合样本的全基因组基因分型快速评估来源未知人群的遗传起源。
PLoS Genet. 2010 Mar 5;6(3):e1000866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000866.
5
Estimation of Genetic Relationships Between Individuals Across Cohorts and Platforms: Application to Childhood Height.跨队列和平台的个体间遗传关系估计:在儿童身高方面的应用。
Behav Genet. 2015 Sep;45(5):514-28. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9725-7. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Ancestry-informative marker (AIM) SNP panel for the Malay population.马来人群的祖先信息标记(AIM)单核苷酸多态性(SNP)面板。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Jan;134(1):123-134. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02184-0. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
7
Inferring the population structure and admixture history of three Hmong-Mien-speaking Miao tribes from southwest China based on genome-wide SNP genotyping.基于全基因组单核苷酸多态性基因分型推断中国西南部三个讲苗瑶语的苗族部落的群体结构和混合历史。
Ann Hum Biol. 2021 Aug;48(5):418-429. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2021.2005825.
8
Ancestry inference using principal component analysis and spatial analysis: a distance-based analysis to account for population substructure.利用主成分分析和空间分析进行祖籍推断:基于距离的分析方法,用于解释人口亚结构。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Oct 16;18(1):789. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4166-8.
9
GRAF-pop: A Fast Distance-Based Method To Infer Subject Ancestry from Multiple Genotype Datasets Without Principal Components Analysis.GRAF-pop:一种无需主成分分析即可基于距离推断个体祖先的快速方法,适用于多种基因型数据集。
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Aug 8;9(8):2447-2461. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200925.
10
Colloquium paper: genome-wide patterns of population structure and admixture among Hispanic/Latino populations.学术研讨会论文:西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群的全基因组人口结构和混合模式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):8954-61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914618107. Epub 2010 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing underrepresentation in genomics research through community engagement.通过社区参与解决基因组学研究中的代表性不足问题。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep 1;109(9):1563-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.08.005.
2
Principal Component Analyses (PCA)-based findings in population genetic studies are highly biased and must be reevaluated.基于主成分分析(PCA)的群体遗传学研究结果存在高度偏差,必须重新评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14683. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14395-4.
3
Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects.
同一家系全基因组关联分析可减少直接遗传效应估计的偏差。
Nat Genet. 2022 May;54(5):581-592. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01062-7. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Robustification of GWAS to explore effective SNPs addressing the challenges of hidden population stratification and polygenic effects.稳健化 GWAS 以探索有效的 SNPs,解决潜在人群分层和多基因效应的挑战。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 22;11(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90774-7.
5
Differences between germline genomes of monozygotic twins.同卵双胞胎的种系基因组差异。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jan;53(1):27-34. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00755-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.通过家系内分析避免孟德尔随机化中的家族性、选择性交配和群体分层偏倚。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 14;11(1):3519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4.
7
Efficient toolkit implementing best practices for principal component analysis of population genetic data.高效工具包,实现了群体遗传数据主成分分析的最佳实践。
Bioinformatics. 2020 Aug 15;36(16):4449-4457. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa520.
8
Genetic Similarity Assessment of Twin-Family Populations by Custom-Designed Genotyping Array.通过定制基因分型阵列评估双生子家庭群体的遗传相似性
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2019 Aug;22(4):210-219. doi: 10.1017/thg.2019.41. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
The Missing Diversity in Human Genetic Studies.人类基因研究中缺失的多样性。
Cell. 2019 May 2;177(4):1080. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.032.
10
A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots.关于如何不过度解读 STRUCTURE 和 ADMIXTURE 条形图的教程。
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 14;9(1):3258. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7.