• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内源性和外源性因素之间的竞争会延迟内部选择性注意。

Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors.

作者信息

Ester Edward F, Nouri Asal

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Integrative Neuroscience Program, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.

Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

出版信息

iScience. 2023 Jul 3;26(7):107259. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107259. eCollection 2023 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107259
PMID:37519902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10371823/
Abstract

External attention is mediated by competition between endogenous (goal-driven) and exogenous (stimulus-driven) factors, with the balance of competition determining which stimuli are selected. Occasionally, exogenous factors "win" this competition and drive the selection of task-irrelevant stimuli. Endogenous and exogenous selection mechanisms may also compete to control the selection of internal representations (e.g., those stored in working memory), but whether this competition is resolved in the same way as external attention is unknown. Here, we leveraged the high temporal resolution of human EEG to determine how competition between endogenous and exogenous factors influences the selection of internal representations. Unlike external attention, competition did not prompt the selection of task-irrelevant working memory content. Instead, it delayed the endogenous selection of task-relevant working memory content by several hundred milliseconds. Thus, competition between endogenous and exogenous factors influences internal selective attention, but in a different way than external selective attention.

摘要

外部注意力由内源性(目标驱动)和外源性(刺激驱动)因素之间的竞争介导,竞争的平衡决定了选择哪些刺激。偶尔,外源性因素会“赢得”这场竞争,并驱动对与任务无关的刺激的选择。内源性和外源性选择机制也可能竞争以控制内部表征(例如,那些存储在工作记忆中的表征)的选择,但这种竞争是否以与外部注意力相同的方式解决尚不清楚。在这里,我们利用人类脑电图的高时间分辨率来确定内源性和外源性因素之间的竞争如何影响内部表征的选择。与外部注意力不同,竞争并没有促使选择与任务无关的工作记忆内容。相反,它将与任务相关的工作记忆内容的内源性选择延迟了几百毫秒。因此,内源性和外源性因素之间的竞争影响内部选择性注意力,但方式与外部选择性注意力不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/70a8e267edcb/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/8c32d60138ab/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/2c1c8c2a02f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/5fcb2b30ef58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/e5c47ccaec3d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/12c053de20fe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/891ecadebba1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/e3223effa62f/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/84bd86ef37be/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/c2ee08bb5aed/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/a9abd41784c7/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/bf1e105f929b/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/70a8e267edcb/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/8c32d60138ab/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/2c1c8c2a02f3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/5fcb2b30ef58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/e5c47ccaec3d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/12c053de20fe/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/891ecadebba1/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/e3223effa62f/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/84bd86ef37be/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/c2ee08bb5aed/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/a9abd41784c7/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/bf1e105f929b/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f53/10371823/70a8e267edcb/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
Internal selective attention is delayed by competition between endogenous and exogenous factors.内源性和外源性因素之间的竞争会延迟内部选择性注意。
iScience. 2023 Jul 3;26(7):107259. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107259. eCollection 2023 Jul 21.
2
Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.有目标导向和刺激驱动的内部表示选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24590-24598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013432117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
3
Neural Signatures of Competition between Voluntary and Involuntary Influences over the Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory.注意的视觉工作记忆中,自愿与非自愿影响竞争的神经特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 May 1;36(5):815-827. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02123.
4
Stimulus Heterogeneity in a Task-Irrelevant Dimension Affects Selective Attention.任务无关维度中的刺激异质性会影响选择性注意。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 12;13(6):495. doi: 10.3390/bs13060495.
5
Working memory load modulates distractor competition in primary visual cortex.工作记忆负荷调节初级视觉皮层的分心物竞争。
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):659-65. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq139. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
6
Individual Alpha Peak Frequency Predicts 10 Hz Flicker Effects on Selective Attention.个体阿尔法峰值频率可预测10赫兹闪烁对选择性注意的影响。
J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 18;37(42):10173-10184. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1163-17.2017. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
7
Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.比较任务相关和任务无关记忆驱动注意的时间动态和效果。
Cogn Process. 2022 May;23(2):299-308. doi: 10.1007/s10339-021-01069-8. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.工作记忆作为内部注意:对内部和外部选择过程的综合解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):228-42. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y.
9
Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.工作记忆引导的注意与外源性注意相互竞争,但与内源性注意不相互竞争。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(5):426. doi: 10.3390/bs13050426.
10
Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.先前的研究表明,即使相应的感觉表征没有变化,与奖励相关的刺激也可以在 MEG 测量中捕获空间注意力。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 24;40(26):5033-5050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1172-19.2020. Epub 2020 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Traveling waves link human visual and frontal cortex during working memory-guided behavior.在工作记忆引导的行为过程中,行波连接人类视觉皮层和额叶皮层。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 29;122(30):e2415573122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415573122. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
2
Stimulus onset asynchrony modulates stimuli-driven and goal-directed attention to internal representations.刺激起始异步性调节对内部表征的刺激驱动型和目标导向型注意力。
Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01290-9.
3
Reappearing sensory input guides visual working memory prioritization.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in behavioral priority influence the accessibility of working memory content.行为优先级的变化会影响工作记忆内容的可及性。
Neuroimage. 2023 May 15;272:120055. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120055. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
2
Turning Attention Inside Out: How Working Memory Serves Behavior.将注意力由外转内:工作记忆如何服务于行为。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:137-165. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-021422-041757. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention.
重新出现的感觉输入引导视觉工作记忆的优先级。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03103-9.
4
Neural Signatures of Competition between Voluntary and Involuntary Influences over the Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory.注意的视觉工作记忆中,自愿与非自愿影响竞争的神经特征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 May 1;36(5):815-827. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02123.
微扫视与隐蔽空间注意的神经调制之间存在功能而非必需的联系。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jun 17;13(1):3503. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31217-3.
4
Analogous computations in working memory input, output and motor gating: Electrophysiological and computational modeling evidence.工作记忆输入、输出和运动门控中的类似计算:电生理和计算建模证据。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jun 7;17(6):e1008971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008971. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.解决注意力捕获争论的进展。
Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
High-pass filtering artifacts in multivariate classification of neural time series data.高通滤波伪影对神经时间序列数据的多变量分类的影响。
J Neurosci Methods. 2021 Mar 15;352:109080. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109080. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Goal-directed and stimulus-driven selection of internal representations.有目标导向和刺激驱动的内部表示选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24590-24598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013432117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
8
Recovery of information from latent memory stores decreases over time.从潜在记忆库中恢复信息的能力会随时间的推移而下降。
Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;11(1-2):101-110. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2019.1617258. Epub 2019 May 25.
9
Eye movements explain decodability during perception and cued attention in MEG.眼动解释了 MEG 中感知和提示注意期间的可解码性。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 15;195:444-453. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.069. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
10
Neural mechanisms of attending to items in working memory.工作记忆中注意项目的神经机制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jun;101:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 26.