Serrano Benjamin, Amblard Régis, Beaumont Tiffany, Hugonnet Florent, Dietz Matthieu, Berthier Frédéric, Garnier Nicolas, Villeneuve Rémy, Nataf Valérie, Mocquot François, Montemagno Christopher, Faraggi Marc, Paulmier Benoît
Medical Physics Department, Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco.
Laboratoire d'évaluation de la dose interne, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
EJNMMI Phys. 2023 Jul 31;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00566-3.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of a large field Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT) camera to estimate thyroid uptake (TU) on single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images with and without attenuation correction (Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC) compared with Planar acquisition in a series of 23 consecutive patients. The secondary objective was to determine radiation doses for the tracer administration and for the additional Computed Tomography (CT) scan.
Cross-calibration factors were determined using a thyroid phantom, for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images. Then Planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions centered on the thyroid were performed on 5 anthropomorphic phantoms with activity ranging from 0.4 to 10 MBq, and 23 patients after administration of 79.2 ± 3.7 MBq of [Tc]-pertechnetate. We estimated the absolute thyroid activity (AThA) for the anthropomorphic phantoms and the TU for the patients. Radiation dose was also determined using International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) reports and VirtualDoseCT software.
Cross-calibration factors were 66.2 ± 4.9, 60.7 ± 0.7 and 26.5 ± 0.3 counts/(MBq s), respectively, for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images. Theoretical and estimated AThA for Planar, Tomo-AC and Tomo-NoAC images were statistically highly correlated (r < 0.99; P < 10) and the average of the relative percentage difference between theoretical and estimated AThA were (8.6 ± 17.8), (- 1.3 ± 5.2) and (12.8 ± 5.7) %, respectively. Comparisons between TU based on different pairs of images (Planar vs Tomo-AC, Planar vs Tomo-NoAC and Tomo-AC vs Tomo-NoAC) showed statistically significant correlation (r = 0.972, 0.961 and 0.935, respectively; P < 10). Effective and thyroid absorbed doses were, respectively (0.34 + 0.95) mSv, and (3.88 + 1.74) mGy.
AThA estimation using Planar and SPECT/CT acquisitions on a new generation of CZT large-field cameras is feasible. In addition, TU on SPECT/CT was as accurate as conventional planar acquisition, but the CT induced additional thyroid exposure. Trial registration Name of the registry: Thyroid Uptake Quantification on a New Generation of Gamma Camera (QUANTHYC).
NCT05049551. Registered September 20, 2021-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT05049551?cntry=MC&draw=2&rank=4 .
本研究的主要目的是评估一款大视野碲锌镉(CZT)相机在有和没有衰减校正(Tomo-AC和Tomo-NoAC)的单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)图像上估计甲状腺摄取(TU)的能力,并与23例连续患者的平面采集进行比较。次要目的是确定示踪剂给药和额外计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的辐射剂量。
使用甲状腺模型确定平面、Tomo-AC和Tomo-NoAC图像的交叉校准因子。然后,对5个活性范围为0.4至10 MBq的人体模型以及23例患者在给予79.2±3.7 MBq的[锝]高锝酸盐后进行以甲状腺为中心的平面和SPECT/CT采集。我们估计了人体模型的绝对甲状腺活性(AThA)和患者的TU。还使用国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)报告和VirtualDoseCT软件确定了辐射剂量。
平面、Tomo-AC和Tomo-NoAC图像的交叉校准因子分别为66.2±4.9、60.7±0.7和26.5±0.3计数/(MBq·秒)。平面、Tomo-AC和Tomo-NoAC图像的理论和估计AThA在统计学上高度相关(r<0.99;P<10),理论和估计AThA之间的相对百分比差异平均值分别为(8.6±17.8)%、(-1.3±5.2)%和(12.8±5.7)%。基于不同图像对(平面与Tomo-AC、平面与Tomo-NoAC以及Tomo-AC与Tomo-NoAC)的TU比较显示出统计学上的显著相关性(r分别为0.972、0.961和0.935;P<10)。有效剂量和甲状腺吸收剂量分别为(0.34 + 0.95)mSv和(3.88 + 1.74)mGy。
在新一代CZT大视野相机上使用平面和SPECT/CT采集来估计AThA是可行的。此外,SPECT/CT上的TU与传统平面采集一样准确,但CT会导致额外的甲状腺辐射暴露。试验注册 注册机构名称:新一代伽马相机上的甲状腺摄取定量(QUANTHYC)。
NCT05049551。于2021年9月20日注册——回顾性注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT05049551?cntry=MC&draw=2&rank=4 。