Robotic-assisted technology does not influence functional outcomes among obese and morbidly obese total knee arthroplasty patients.

PURPOSE

Despite benefits of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on function and quality of life, obese patients have less improved functional outcomes following TKA compared to their normal weight counterparts. Furthermore, obesity is a risk factor for aseptic loosening and revision surgery following TKA. With known benefits of robotic-assisted TKA (RaTKA) in precision and patient satisfaction, we aimed to evaluate the differences in patient reported outcome and early complication rates for patients undergoing RaTKA versus conventional TKA among patients of varying BMI groups.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent conventional versus RaTKA. Patients were grouped by BMI range (< 30 kg/m2, 30-40 kg/m2, and > 40 kg/m2). Patient-reported outcomes were measured by Oxford Knee Scores and 12-Item Short Form Survey scores preoperatively, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperatively. Mixed-effects linear models were built for each patient-reported outcome to assess the interaction between type of surgery and BMI while adjusting for known confounders such as demographic variables.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients (n = 186 RaTKA, n = 164 conventional TKA) met inclusion criteria. SF-12 physical scores were significantly higher at 2-year follow-up among non-obese patients compared to obese and morbidly obese patients (p = 0.047). There was no statistically significant interaction between the type of surgery performed (RaTKA versus conventional TKA) and obesity regarding their effects on patient reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates no differences in functional outcomes among patients undergoing RaTKA compared to conventional TKA. Furthermore, obesity had no significant effect on this association.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.