Malik Mansi, Girotra Siaa, Zode Mrunali, Basu Saurav
Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 1;15(7):e41263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41263. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Background India continues to have unsafe abortions despite progressive legislation since the past five decades facilitating ease of access to abortion services. This study describes abortion care-seeking patterns (social/therapeutic/humanitarian/sex-selective/safe/unsafe), preferences (public/private/at home), and their determinants among Indian women. Methods Data were taken from the Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) including women aged 15-49 years, who had terminated their last pregnancy by induced abortion within five years prior to the survey (N = 5,856). A bivariate analysis, followed by a multinomial logistic regression model, was performed to assess the predictors affecting the choice of healthcare facility type for an abortion. Predictors of unsafe and self-managed abortions were examined using binary logistic regression. Results About 665,671 women in the reproductive age group responded to the survey, of which 3.42% (n=22,767) reported their most recent pregnancy within the last five years terminated in either a miscarriage, stillbirth or abortion, of which 5,856 (25.72%) underwent an induced abortion. Women undergoing surgical abortion were more likely to avail of either a public (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR)=38.06 (23.62, 61.35)) or a private facility (aRRR=44.53 (28.11,70.53)) compared to at-home abortions. Women reporting a social and humanitarian reason for abortion were less likely to undergo an abortion at a public (aRRR=0.25 (0.17,0.35)) or private facility (aRRR=0.32 (0.23,0.44)) than at home. Furthermore, a total of 147 (2.43%) abortions were classified as unsafe. Women reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion were observed to have a higher likelihood of engaging in an unsafe abortion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 1.61 (0.70, 3.70)) compared to those citing a therapeutic reason. Conclusions Self-managed abortions at home were more prevalent in women of lower socioeconomic status, adolescent girls, and those reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion. Furthermore, the reproductive-health program in India should enhance capacity-building initiatives for primary-care healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, to effectively prescribe and supervise abortion through medication methods.
尽管在过去五十年中印度通过了进步的立法以便利堕胎服务的获取,但不安全堕胎现象仍持续存在。本研究描述了印度女性寻求堕胎护理的模式(社会/治疗/人道主义/性别选择/安全/不安全)、偏好(公立/私立/在家)及其决定因素。方法:数据取自印度国家家庭健康调查(NFHS - 5)(2019 - 2021),包括年龄在15 - 49岁之间、在调查前五年内通过人工流产终止最后一次妊娠的女性(N = 5856)。进行了双变量分析,随后采用多项逻辑回归模型来评估影响堕胎医疗设施类型选择的预测因素。使用二元逻辑回归检查不安全和自我管理堕胎的预测因素。结果:约665671名育龄妇女对调查做出了回应,其中3.42%(n = 22767)报告其在过去五年内最近一次妊娠以流产、死产或堕胎告终,其中5856人(25.72%)接受了人工流产。与在家堕胎相比,接受手术堕胎的女性更有可能选择公立(调整后的相对风险比(aRRR)= 38.06(23.62,61.35))或私立机构(aRRR = 44.53(28.11,70.53))。报告因社会和人道主义原因堕胎的女性在公立(aRRR = 0.25(0.17,0.35))或私立机构(aRRR = 0.32(0.23,0.44))进行堕胎的可能性低于在家堕胎。此外,共有147例(2.43%)堕胎被归类为不安全。与以治疗为原因的女性相比,报告因性别选择原因堕胎的女性进行不安全堕胎的可能性更高(调整后的优势比(aOR)= 1.61(0.70,3.70))。结论:在家自我管理堕胎在社会经济地位较低的女性、青少年女孩以及报告因性别选择原因堕胎的女性中更为普遍。此外,印度的生殖健康计划应加强对包括医生、护士和药剂师在内的初级保健医疗服务提供者的能力建设举措,以有效地通过药物方法开处方和监督堕胎。