Suppr超能文献

感觉加工敏感性的神经生理特征。

Neurophysiological signatures of sensory-processing sensitivity.

作者信息

Meinersen-Schmidt Nicole, Walter Nike, Kulla Patricia, Loew Thomas, Hinterberger Thilo, Kruse Joachim

机构信息

Department for Clinical Psychology and Trauma Therapy, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.

Section of Applied Consciousness Sciences, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Jul 20;17:1200962. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1200962. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sensory processing sensitivity is mainly captured based on questionnaires and it's neurophysiological basis is largely unknown. As hitherto no electroencephalography (EEG) study has been carried out, the aim of this work was to determine whether the self-reported level of SPS correlates with the EEG activity in different frequency bands.

METHODS

One hundred fifteen participants were measured with 64-channel EEG during a task-free resting state. After artifact correction, a power spectrum time series was calculated using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for the following frequency bands: Delta: 1-3.5 Hz, theta: 4-7.5 Hz, alpha1: 8-10 Hz, alpha2: 10.5-12 Hz, beta1: 12.5-15 Hz, beta2: 15.5-25 Hz, gamma: 25.5-45 Hz, global: 1-45 Hz. Correlations with the 'Highly Sensitive Person Scale' (HSPS-G) scores were determined. Then, the lowest and the highest 30% of the cohort were contrasted as polar opposites. EEG features were compared between the two groups applying a paired two-tailed -test.

RESULTS

The HSPS-G scores correlated statistically significantly positive with beta 1 and 2, and global EEG power during resting with eyes open, but not during resting with eyes closed. The highly sensitive group revealed higher beta power (4.38 ± 0.32 vs. 4.21 ± 0.17,  = 0.014), higher gamma power (4.21 ± 0.37 vs. 4.00 ± 0.25,  = 0.010), and increased global EEG power (4.38 ± 0.29 vs. 4.25 ± 0.17,  = 0.041). The higher EEG activity in the HSP group was most pronounced in the central, parietal, and temporal region, whereas lower EEG activity was most present in occipital areas.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, neurophysiological signatures associated with SPS during a task free resting state were demonstrated. Evidence is provided that neural processes differ between HSP and non-HSP. During resting with eyes open HSP exhibit higher EEG activity suggesting increased information processing. The findings could be of importance for the development of biomarkers for clinical diagnostics and intervention efficacy evaluation.

摘要

背景

感觉加工敏感性主要通过问卷来衡量,其神经生理学基础在很大程度上尚不清楚。由于迄今为止尚未开展脑电图(EEG)研究,本研究的目的是确定自我报告的感觉加工敏感性水平是否与不同频段的脑电活动相关。

方法

115名参与者在无任务静息状态下接受64导脑电图测量。在去除伪迹后,使用快速傅里叶变换(FFT)计算以下频段的功率谱时间序列:δ波:1 - 3.5赫兹,θ波:4 - 7.5赫兹,α1波:8 - 10赫兹,α2波:10.5 - 12赫兹,β1波:12.5 - 15赫兹,β2波:15.5 - 25赫兹,γ波:25.5 - 45赫兹,全频段:1 - 45赫兹。确定与“高敏感人群量表”(HSPS - G)得分的相关性。然后,将队列中最低和最高的30%作为极端对立组进行对比。应用配对双尾检验比较两组的脑电图特征。

结果

HSPS - G得分与睁眼静息时的β1和β2波以及全频段脑电功率在统计学上呈显著正相关,但闭眼静息时无此相关性。高敏感组显示出更高的β波功率(4.38 ± 0.32对4.21 ± 0.17,P = 0.014)、更高的γ波功率(4.21 ± 0.37对4.00 ± 0.25,P = 0.010)以及更高的全频段脑电功率(4.38 ± 0.29对4.25 ± 0.17,P = 0.041)。高敏感组较高的脑电活动在中央、顶叶和颞叶区域最为明显,而较低的脑电活动在枕叶区域最为显著。

结论

首次证明了在无任务静息状态下与感觉加工敏感性相关的神经生理学特征。有证据表明高敏感人群和非高敏感人群的神经过程存在差异。在睁眼静息时,高敏感人群表现出更高的脑电活动,提示信息加工增加。这些发现可能对临床诊断生物标志物的开发和干预疗效评估具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafc/10399120/76efb398b424/fnins-17-1200962-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验