• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精与道德:一杯酒就足以让人宣称要伤害他人并做出不道德的行为。

Alcohol and morality: one alcoholic drink is enough to make people declare to harm others and behave impurely.

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Grazynskiego 53, 40-126, Katowice, Poland.

Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Goddard Laboratories, 3710 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Oct;240(10):2163-2172. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06438-z. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00213-023-06438-z
PMID:37555928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10506948/
Abstract

We aimed to understand if alcohol intoxication affects the willingness to violate moral foundations (care, fairness, authority, loyalty, and purity). We conducted a laboratory study (N = 387) with three randomized groups: alcohol intoxication, placebo, and control, measuring the sacralization of moral foundations via the Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale. The study showed intoxicated participants sacralized moral foundations of care and purity more often than participants from control and placebo groups. It means participants declared more willing to physically harm other people and animals and behave impurely, e.g., doing deviant sexual behaviors or selling their souls. No differences related to fairness, authority, and loyalty were found. Our study helps to understand the decision processes underlying immoral behaviors, including crimes. We showed that even one drink makes people change their judgments about what is right and wrong (in the cases of harmful and impure behaviors), and because this kind of judgment precedes immoral behaviors, our results may help explain why some people under the influence of alcohol break the rules by doing things which they would never do when sober.

摘要

我们旨在了解醉酒是否会影响人们违背道德基础(关爱、公平、权威、忠诚和纯洁)的意愿。我们进行了一项实验室研究(N=387),分为三组:醉酒组、安慰剂组和对照组,通过道德基础神圣性量表来衡量道德基础的神圣化。研究表明,醉酒参与者比对照组和安慰剂组更经常将道德基础的关爱和纯洁神圣化。这意味着参与者表示更愿意对他人和动物造成身体伤害,行为不端,例如进行反常的性行为或出卖自己的灵魂。在公平、权威和忠诚方面没有发现差异。我们的研究有助于理解包括犯罪在内的不道德行为背后的决策过程。我们表明,即使只喝一杯酒,也会让人改变对对错的判断(在有害和不纯洁的行为中),而且由于这种判断先于不道德行为,我们的结果可能有助于解释为什么有些人在酒精的影响下,会做出一些他们在清醒时绝不会做的违反规则的事情。

相似文献

1
Alcohol and morality: one alcoholic drink is enough to make people declare to harm others and behave impurely.酒精与道德:一杯酒就足以让人宣称要伤害他人并做出不道德的行为。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023 Oct;240(10):2163-2172. doi: 10.1007/s00213-023-06438-z. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Different judgment frameworks for moral compliance and moral violation.不同的道德遵守和道德违反判断框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66862-9.
3
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.自由主义者和保守主义者依赖不同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015141.
4
Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people.自由派和保守派在对有影响力的人做出道德判断时,依赖于共同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;104(6):1040-59. doi: 10.1037/a0032277. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
5
The Immoral Landscape? Scientists Are Associated with Violations of Morality.《不道德的图景?科学家与道德违规行为有关联》
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0152798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152798. eCollection 2016.
6
Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.玷污灵魂:对纯洁的关注预示着对自杀的道德评判。
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):217-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
The moral foundations of illusory correlation.虚假相关的道德基础。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185758. eCollection 2017.
8
A functional neuroimaging investigation of Moral Foundations Theory.道德基础理论的功能性神经影像学研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2022 Dec;17(6):491-507. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2022.2148737. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Moral foundations theory in autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative investigation.自闭症谱系障碍中的道德基础理论:一项定性研究。
Autism. 2020 Nov;24(8):2202-2212. doi: 10.1177/1362361320939331. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
10
Political Orientations and Morality Judgments in the Turkish Context: Considering the Roles of the Needs for Cognition and Recognition.土耳其语境下的政治倾向和道德判断:认知需求和认同的作用
Psychol Rep. 2021 Feb;124(1):318-347. doi: 10.1177/0033294119899903. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The Drunk Utilitarian Revisited: Does Alcohol Really Increase Utilitarianism in Moral Judgment?再探醉酒的功利主义者:酒精真的会增强道德判断中的功利主义倾向吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jan;49(1):20-31. doi: 10.1177/01461672211052120. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
2
Delay discounting, time perspective, and self-schemas in adolescent alcohol drinking and disordered eating behaviors.青少年饮酒和饮食失调行为中的延迟折扣、时间观和自我图式。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105703. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105703. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
Multidimensional elements of impulsivity as shared and unique risk factors for food addiction and alcohol misuse.冲动的多维因素既是食物成瘾和酒精滥用的共同风险因素,也是其独特的风险因素。
Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105052. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105052. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis.道德基础与政治取向:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;147(1):55-94. doi: 10.1037/bul0000308. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Religious moral righteousness over care: a review and a meta-analysis.宗教道德义凌驾于关怀之上:综述和荟萃分析。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Aug;40:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Alcohol, empathy, and morality: acute effects of alcohol consumption on affective empathy and moral decision-making.酒精、同理心与道德:饮酒对情感同理心和道德决策的急性影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Dec;236(12):3477-3496. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05314-z. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
7
The effect of hunger and satiety in the judgment of ethical violations.饥饿与饱腹感对道德违规判断的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Aug;125:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 28.
8
An evolutionary perspective on nutrition and social decision making.关于营养与社会决策的进化视角。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):E1331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721889115. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Reply to Raison and Raichlen: Why does nutrition impact social decision making?对雷森和赖希伦的回应:为什么营养会影响社会决策?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):E1332-E1333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1722569115. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
10
Impact of nutrition on social decision making.营养对社会决策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 20;114(25):6510-6514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620245114. Epub 2017 Jun 12.