• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定基于权利的儿童测试、治疗、检查和干预标准:采用协作、多阶段、多方法和多利益相关者的方法来达成共识。

Developing rights-based standards for children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions: using a collaborative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus.

机构信息

Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.

Edge Hill University and Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;182(10):4707-4721. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05131-9. Epub 2023 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-023-05131-9
PMID:
37566281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587267/
Abstract

Children continue to experience harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. The international ISupport collaboration aimed to develop standards to outline and explain good procedural practice and the rights of children within the context of a clinical procedure. The rights-based standards for children undergoing tests, treatments, investigations, examinations and interventions were developed using an iterative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder consensus building approach. This consensus approach used a range of online and face to face methods across three phases to ensure ongoing engagement with multiple stakeholders. The views and perspectives of 203 children and young people, 78 parents and 418 multi-disciplinary professionals gathered over a two year period (2020-2022) informed the development of international rights-based standards for the care of children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions. The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds.    Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind which outlines international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. The standards offer health professionals and educators clear evidence-based tools to support discussions and practice changes to challenge prevailing assumptions about holding or restraining children and instead encourage a focus on the interests and rights of the child. What is Known: • Children continue to experience short and long-term harm when undergoing clinical procedures despite increased evidence of the need to improve the provision of child-centred care. • Professionals report uncertainty and tensions in applying evidence-based practice to children's procedural care. What is New: • This is the first study of its kind which has developed international rights-based procedural care standards from multi-stakeholder perspectives. • The standards are the first to reach international multi-stakeholder consensus on definitions of supportive and restraining holds.

摘要

尽管越来越多的证据表明需要改善以儿童为中心的护理服务,但儿童在接受临床治疗时仍会继续受到伤害。国际 ISupport 合作旨在制定标准,以概述和解释在临床治疗过程中儿童的良好治疗实践和权利。基于权利的儿童接受测试、治疗、调查、检查和干预的标准是使用迭代、多阶段、多方法和多利益相关者共识构建方法制定的。这种共识方法使用了一系列在线和面对面的方法,跨越三个阶段,以确保与多个利益相关者持续接触。203 名儿童和年轻人、78 名家长和 418 名多学科专业人员在两年期间(2020-2022 年)的意见和观点,为制定国际儿童测试、治疗、检查和干预护理的基于权利的标准提供了信息。这些标准是第一个就支持性和约束性约束的定义达成国际多利益相关者共识的标准。 结论:这是第一项从多利益相关者角度概述基于权利的程序护理标准的此类研究。这些标准为卫生专业人员和教育工作者提供了明确的循证工具,以支持讨论和实践变革,挑战对约束或限制儿童的普遍假设,转而鼓励关注儿童的利益和权利。 已知: • 尽管越来越多的证据表明需要改善以儿童为中心的护理服务,但儿童在接受临床治疗时仍会继续受到短期和长期的伤害。 • 专业人员报告在将循证实践应用于儿童程序护理时存在不确定性和紧张情绪。 新内容: • 这是第一项从多利益相关者角度制定国际基于权利的程序护理标准的此类研究。 • 这些标准是第一个就支持性和约束性约束的定义达成国际多利益相关者共识的标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc9/10587267/9bf3397c2fb5/431_2023_5131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc9/10587267/2948156cf4f7/431_2023_5131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc9/10587267/9bf3397c2fb5/431_2023_5131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc9/10587267/2948156cf4f7/431_2023_5131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bc9/10587267/9bf3397c2fb5/431_2023_5131_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing rights-based standards for children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions: using a collaborative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus.制定基于权利的儿童测试、治疗、检查和干预标准:采用协作、多阶段、多方法和多利益相关者的方法来达成共识。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;182(10):4707-4721. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05131-9. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Best practice recommendations on the application of seclusion and restraint in mental health services: An evidence, human rights and consensus-based approach.关于精神卫生服务中使用隔离和约束的最佳实践建议:基于证据、人权和共识的方法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Jun;30(3):580-593. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12890. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
5
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
6
Parent-delivered interventions used at home to improve eating, drinking and swallowing in children with neurodisability: the FEEDS mixed-methods study.家长在家中实施的干预措施,以改善神经发育障碍儿童的进食、饮水和吞咽能力:FEEDS 混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(22):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta25220.
7
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
8
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
9
Bridging the gap: A quality improvement project to implement psychosocial care standards into clinical practice in pediatric oncology.弥合差距:将心理社会关怀标准融入儿科肿瘤临床实践的质量改进项目。
Klin Padiatr. 2023 Nov;235(6):350-359. doi: 10.1055/a-2104-1049. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
10
Consensus standards for the care of children and adolescents in Australian health services.澳大利亚卫生服务中儿童和青少年护理的共识标准。
Med J Aust. 2011 Jan 17;194(2):78-82. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04172.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Rights-Based Priorities for Children with SEND in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Multi-Method, Multi-Phased, Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Approach.新冠疫情后时代特殊教育需要儿童基于权利的优先事项:一种多方法、多阶段、多利益相关方的共识方法。
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;12(7):827. doi: 10.3390/children12070827.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Psychological Safety During Medical Procedures Among Individuals Diagnosed with Chronic Illness in Childhood.童年期慢性病患者在医疗过程中心理安全感的障碍与促进因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;13(8):914. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080914.
3
Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Visual CARE Measure for assessing children's perceptions of nurses' empathy.

本文引用的文献

1
It hurts to get forced: Children's narratives about restraint during medical procedures.被迫的滋味不好受:儿童关于医疗程序中约束的叙述。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 Feb 2;5(4):110-118. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12093. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Communication during children's X-ray procedures and children's experiences of the procedure: A scoping review.儿童 X 光检查过程中的沟通和儿童对检查过程的体验:范围综述。
Radiography (Lond). 2023 May;29 Suppl 1:S87-S95. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Interventions and methods to prepare, educate or familiarise children and young people for radiological procedures: a scoping review.
用于评估儿童对护士同理心认知的瑞典语版视觉关怀量表的效度和信度。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 18;184(2):145. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-05979-z.
4
Paediatric patient perceptions of healthcare professionals: contributions to a communication curriculum.儿科患者对医疗保健专业人员的看法:对沟通课程的贡献。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 12;184(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05911-x.
5
Swedish translation of the iSUPPORT rights-based standards to support paediatric patients having a clinical procedure.支持儿科患者进行临床手术的基于权利的iSUPPORT标准的瑞典语翻译。
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Feb;114(2):445-447. doi: 10.1111/apa.17488. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Procedural sedation competencies: a review and multidisciplinary international consensus statement on knowledge, skills, training, and credentialing.程序性镇静能力:关于知识、技能、培训和资质认证的综述及多学科国际共识声明
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;134(3):817-829. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.036. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
为儿童和青少年准备、教育或使其熟悉放射学检查程序的干预措施和方法:一项范围综述
Insights Imaging. 2022 Sep 5;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01278-5.
4
Distracting Through Procedural Pain and Distress Using Virtual Reality and Guided Imagery in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial.虚拟现实和引导想象在儿科、青少年和青年患者中通过程序性疼痛和痛苦分散注意力:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 18;24(4):e30260. doi: 10.2196/30260.
5
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.采用 interRAI 数据制定基于社区的姑息治疗质量指标的多阶段流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
6
Impact of the CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system on school-based vaccinations: A cluster randomized trial.CARD(舒适询问放松分散)系统对学校为基础的疫苗接种的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Vaccine. 2022 Apr 26;40(19):2802-2809. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.069. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
7
Parental experiences of caring for children who have learning disabilities and procedural anxiety in hospital: An interpretive phenomenological study.家长照顾在医院中患有学习障碍和程序性焦虑的孩子的体验:一项阐释性现象学研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 2022 Sep;48(5):809-819. doi: 10.1111/cch.12990. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Being heard - Supporting person-centred communication in paediatric care using augmentative and alternative communication as universal design: A position paper.被倾听——在儿科护理中使用辅助和替代沟通作为通用设计支持以患者为中心的沟通:一份立场文件。
Nurs Inq. 2022 Apr;29(2):e12426. doi: 10.1111/nin.12426. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Developing a family-reported measure of experiences with home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care: a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach.制定家庭报告的家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀体验测量工具:一种多方法、多利益相关者方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 14;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0.
10
Baring all: The impact of the hospital gown on patient well-being.坦诚相待:病号服对患者福祉的影响。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):452-473. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12416. Epub 2020 Apr 20.