• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情后时代特殊教育需要儿童基于权利的优先事项:一种多方法、多阶段、多利益相关方的共识方法。

Rights-Based Priorities for Children with SEND in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Multi-Method, Multi-Phased, Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Approach.

作者信息

Ashworth Emma, Bray Lucy, Alghrani Amel, Byrne Seamus, Kirkby Joanna

机构信息

School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK.

Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk L39 4QP, UK.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;12(7):827. doi: 10.3390/children12070827.

DOI:10.3390/children12070827
PMID:40723020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12293363/
Abstract

The provision of education, health, and social care for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) in England has long been criticised for its inequities and chronic underfunding. These systemic issues were further exacerbated by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying restrictions, which disrupted essential services and resulted in widespread unmet needs and infringements on the rights of many children with SEND. This study aimed to use a three-phase consensus-building approach with 1353 participants across five stakeholder groups to collaboratively develop evidence-informed priorities for policy and practice. The priorities sought to help address the longstanding disparities and respond to the intensified challenges brought about by the pandemic. A total of 55 children with SEND (aged 5-16), 893 parents/carers, and 307 professionals working in SEND-related services participated in the first phase through online surveys. This was followed by semi-structured interviews with four children and young people, ten parents/carers, and 15 professionals, allowing for deeper exploration of lived experiences and priorities. The data were analysed, synthesised, and structured into five overarching areas of priority. These were subsequently discussed and refined in a series of activity-based group workshops involving 20 children with SEND, 11 parents/carers, and 38 professionals. The consensus-building process led to the identification of key priorities for both pandemic response and longer-term recovery, highlighting the responsibilities of central Government and statutory services to consider and meet the needs of children with SEND. These priorities are framed within a children's rights context and considered against the rights and duties set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Priorities include protecting and promoting children with SEND's rights to (1) play, socialise, and be part of a community, (2) receive support for their social and emotional wellbeing and mental health, (3) feel safe, belong, and learn in school, (4) "access health and social care services and therapies", and (5) receive support for their parents/carers and families. Together, they highlight the urgent need for structural reform to ensure that children with SEND receive the support they are entitled to-not only in times of crisis but as a matter of routine practice and policy.

摘要

长期以来,英国为有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童(SEND)提供教育、医疗和社会护理的情况一直因不公平和长期资金不足而受到批评。2019冠状病毒病疫情的爆发以及随之而来的限制措施进一步加剧了这些系统性问题,这些措施扰乱了基本服务,导致广泛的需求未得到满足,许多有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童的权利受到侵犯。本研究旨在采用三阶段共识构建方法,与五个利益相关者群体的1353名参与者合作,共同制定基于证据的政策和实践优先事项。这些优先事项旨在帮助解决长期存在的差距,并应对疫情带来的加剧挑战。共有55名有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童(5至16岁)、893名家长/照顾者以及307名从事特殊教育需求和残疾相关服务的专业人员通过在线调查参与了第一阶段。随后,对4名儿童和青少年、10名家长/照顾者以及15名专业人员进行了半结构化访谈,以便更深入地探讨生活经历和优先事项。对数据进行了分析、综合,并归纳为五个总体优先领域。随后,在一系列基于活动的小组研讨会上对这些领域进行了讨论和完善,参与研讨会的有20名有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童、11名家长/照顾者以及38名专业人员。共识构建过程确定了应对疫情和长期恢复的关键优先事项,强调了中央政府和法定服务机构考虑并满足有特殊教育需求和残疾儿童需求的责任。这些优先事项是在儿童权利背景下制定的,并参照了《联合国儿童权利公约》(1989年)规定的权利和义务。优先事项包括保护和促进有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童享有以下权利:(1)玩耍、社交并融入社区;(2)在社交和情感福祉以及心理健康方面获得支持;(3)在学校感到安全、有归属感并能够学习;(4)“获得医疗和社会护理服务及治疗”;(5)其家长/照顾者和家庭获得支持。这些优先事项共同凸显了进行结构性改革的迫切需要,以确保有特殊教育需求和残疾的儿童不仅在危机时期,而且在日常实践和政策中都能获得他们应得的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/86d5477a3944/children-12-00827-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/9b2009e02e30/children-12-00827-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/b04d57090f61/children-12-00827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/160165080549/children-12-00827-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/86d5477a3944/children-12-00827-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/9b2009e02e30/children-12-00827-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/b04d57090f61/children-12-00827-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/160165080549/children-12-00827-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5bd/12293363/86d5477a3944/children-12-00827-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Rights-Based Priorities for Children with SEND in the Post-COVID-19 Era: A Multi-Method, Multi-Phased, Multi-Stakeholder Consensus Approach.新冠疫情后时代特殊教育需要儿童基于权利的优先事项:一种多方法、多阶段、多利益相关方的共识方法。
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;12(7):827. doi: 10.3390/children12070827.
2
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
7
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
8
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
10
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing rights-based standards for children having tests, treatments, examinations and interventions: using a collaborative, multi-phased, multi-method and multi-stakeholder approach to build consensus.制定基于权利的儿童测试、治疗、检查和干预标准:采用协作、多阶段、多方法和多利益相关者的方法来达成共识。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Oct;182(10):4707-4721. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05131-9. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
2
Learning from the COVID crisis for educating children and young people with SEN/disabilities.从新冠危机中汲取经验,以教育有特殊教育需要/残疾的儿童和年轻人。
J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2021 Apr;21(2):168-184. doi: 10.1111/1471-3802.12513. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
3
Developing a family-reported measure of experiences with home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care: a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach.
制定家庭报告的家庭为基础的儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀体验测量工具:一种多方法、多利益相关者方法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 14;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and well-being of children and young people.新冠疫情对儿童和青少年心理健康及幸福的影响。
Child Soc. 2021 Jan;35(1):62-74. doi: 10.1111/chso.12430. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
Priorities for the child public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic recovery in England.英国儿童公共卫生应对新冠疫情后恢复工作的重点事项。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Jun;106(6):533-538. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320214. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to Engage Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development.使用在线改良德尔菲法让患者和其他利益相关者参与临床实践指南制定的实用考虑因素。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00389-4.
7
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.GRIPP2报告清单:改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
BMJ. 2017 Aug 2;358:j3453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3453.
8
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.